Institutional repository Toolkit: best-practice templates, step-by-step work plans and maturity diagnostics

$249.00
(46 reviews) Write a Review
Availability:
Downloadable Resources, Instant Access

Save time, empower your teams and effectively upgrade your processes with access to this practical Institutional repository Toolkit and guide. Address common challenges with best-practice templates, step-by-step work plans and maturity diagnostics for any Institutional repository related project.

Download the Toolkit and in Three Steps you will be guided from idea to implementation results.

The Toolkit contains the following practical and powerful enablers with new and updated Institutional repository specific requirements:


STEP 1: Get your bearings

Start with...

  • The latest quick edition of the Institutional repository Self Assessment book in PDF containing 49 requirements to perform a quickscan, get an overview and share with stakeholders.

Organized in a data driven improvement cycle RDMAICS (Recognize, Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control and Sustain), check the…

  • Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation

Then find your goals...


STEP 2: Set concrete goals, tasks, dates and numbers you can track

Featuring new and updated case-based questions, organized into seven core areas of process design, this Self-Assessment will help you identify areas in which Institutional repository improvements can be made.

Examples; 10 of the standard requirements:

  1. Have all basic functions of Institutional repository been defined?

  2. What are the business goals Institutional repository is aiming to achieve?

  3. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?

  4. How would you define the culture here?

  5. Is the Institutional repository process severely broken such that a re-design is necessary?

  6. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

  7. Does Institutional repository analysis isolate the fundamental causes of problems?

  8. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

  9. What else needs to be measured?

  10. Have benefits been optimized with all key stakeholders?


Complete the self assessment, on your own or with a team in a workshop setting. Use the workbook together with the self assessment requirements spreadsheet:

  • The workbook is the latest in-depth complete edition of the Institutional repository book in PDF containing requirements, which criteria correspond to the criteria in...

Your Institutional repository self-assessment dashboard which gives you your dynamically prioritized projects-ready tool and shows your organization exactly what to do next:

  • The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard; with the Institutional repository Self-Assessment and Scorecard you will develop a clear picture of which Institutional repository areas need attention, which requirements you should focus on and who will be responsible for them:

    • Shows your organization instant insight in areas for improvement: Auto generates reports, radar chart for maturity assessment, insights per process and participant and bespoke, ready to use, RACI Matrix
    • Gives you a professional Dashboard to guide and perform a thorough Institutional repository Self-Assessment
    • Is secure: Ensures offline data protection of your Self-Assessment results
    • Dynamically prioritized projects-ready RACI Matrix shows your organization exactly what to do next:

 

STEP 3: Implement, Track, follow up and revise strategy

The outcomes of STEP 2, the self assessment, are the inputs for STEP 3; Start and manage Institutional repository projects with the 62 implementation resources:

  • 62 step-by-step Institutional repository Project Management Form Templates covering over 6000 Institutional repository project requirements and success criteria:

Examples; 10 of the check box criteria:

  1. Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Past experience Ð the person or the group worked at something similar in the past?

  2. Schedule Management Plan: Can additional resources be added to subsequent tasks to reduce the durations of those tasks?

  3. Activity Duration Estimates: Discuss the common sources of risk on information technology Institutional repository projects and suggestions for managing them. Which suggestions do you find most useful?

  4. Cost Baseline: Review your risk triggers -have your risks changed?

  5. Scope Management Plan: During what part of the PM process is the Institutional repository project scope statement created?

  6. Cost Management Plan: Resources Ð How will human resources be scheduled during each phase of the Institutional repository project?

  7. Activity Duration Estimates: If the optimistic estimate for an activity is 12days, and the pessimistic estimate is 18days, what is the standard deviation of this activity?

  8. Probability and Impact Matrix: Which of the risk factors can be avoided altogether?

  9. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Who is directly responsible for decisions on issues important to the Institutional repository project?

  10. WBS Dictionary: Where engineering standards or other internal work measurement systems are used, is there a formal relationship between these values and work package budgets?

 
Step-by-step and complete Institutional repository Project Management Forms and Templates including check box criteria and templates.

1.0 Initiating Process Group:

  • 1.1 Institutional repository project Charter
  • 1.2 Stakeholder Register
  • 1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix


2.0 Planning Process Group:

  • 2.1 Institutional repository project Management Plan
  • 2.2 Scope Management Plan
  • 2.3 Requirements Management Plan
  • 2.4 Requirements Documentation
  • 2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix
  • 2.6 Institutional repository project Scope Statement
  • 2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log
  • 2.8 Work Breakdown Structure
  • 2.9 WBS Dictionary
  • 2.10 Schedule Management Plan
  • 2.11 Activity List
  • 2.12 Activity Attributes
  • 2.13 Milestone List
  • 2.14 Network Diagram
  • 2.15 Activity Resource Requirements
  • 2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure
  • 2.17 Activity Duration Estimates
  • 2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.19 Institutional repository project Schedule
  • 2.20 Cost Management Plan
  • 2.21 Activity Cost Estimates
  • 2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.23 Cost Baseline
  • 2.24 Quality Management Plan
  • 2.25 Quality Metrics
  • 2.26 Process Improvement Plan
  • 2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix
  • 2.28 Roles and Responsibilities
  • 2.29 Human Resource Management Plan
  • 2.30 Communications Management Plan
  • 2.31 Risk Management Plan
  • 2.32 Risk Register
  • 2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment
  • 2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix
  • 2.35 Risk Data Sheet
  • 2.36 Procurement Management Plan
  • 2.37 Source Selection Criteria
  • 2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan
  • 2.39 Change Management Plan


3.0 Executing Process Group:

  • 3.1 Team Member Status Report
  • 3.2 Change Request
  • 3.3 Change Log
  • 3.4 Decision Log
  • 3.5 Quality Audit
  • 3.6 Team Directory
  • 3.7 Team Operating Agreement
  • 3.8 Team Performance Assessment
  • 3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment
  • 3.10 Issue Log


4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group:

  • 4.1 Institutional repository project Performance Report
  • 4.2 Variance Analysis
  • 4.3 Earned Value Status
  • 4.4 Risk Audit
  • 4.5 Contractor Status Report
  • 4.6 Formal Acceptance


5.0 Closing Process Group:

  • 5.1 Procurement Audit
  • 5.2 Contract Close-Out
  • 5.3 Institutional repository project or Phase Close-Out
  • 5.4 Lessons Learned

 

Results

With this Three Step process you will have all the tools you need for any Institutional repository project with this in-depth Institutional repository Toolkit.

In using the Toolkit you will be better able to:

  • Diagnose Institutional repository projects, initiatives, organizations, businesses and processes using accepted diagnostic standards and practices
  • Implement evidence-based best practice strategies aligned with overall goals
  • Integrate recent advances in Institutional repository and put process design strategies into practice according to best practice guidelines

Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a business challenge or meet a business objective is the most valuable role; In EVERY company, organization and department.

Unless you are talking a one-time, single-use project within a business, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions. Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, 'What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?'

This Toolkit empowers people to do just that - whether their title is entrepreneur, manager, consultant, (Vice-)President, CxO etc... - they are the people who rule the future. They are the person who asks the right questions to make Institutional repository investments work better.

This Institutional repository All-Inclusive Toolkit enables You to be that person.

 

Includes lifetime updates

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.

46 Reviews Hide Reviews Show Reviews

  • 5
    This is awesome. Thank you very much.

    Posted by Dr. Martin K. on 5th Sep 2018

    Dr. Martin K. CEO

  • 5
    Thanks for your service! That's really appreciated!

    Posted by HARRY M. on 5th Aug 2018

    HARRY M. Enterprise Architect

  • 5
    The subject is new to me and am sure the resources along with suggested methodology would help me in my pursuit.

    Posted by Ravi P. on 3rd Aug 2018

    Ravi P. Senior Consultant Big 5

  • 5
    Super helpful.. Love how the full assessment helps me take full control of this project!

    Posted by Brett O. on 3rd Aug 2018

    BRETT O. Strategist

  • 5
    Great initiative and timing to release the requirements! And thanks a lot for sharing it with us!

    Posted by Pierre V. on 2nd Aug 2018

    Pierre V. B2B Product & Content Marketing

  • 5
    Congrats! Very cool!

    Posted by Caryn B. on 4th Jul 2018

    Caryn B. Vice President Production

  • 5
    It is a pleasure to know about new tools to improve our performance. Let me congratulate to you about your new achievement.

    Posted by Marta C. on 3rd Jul 2018

    MARTA C., Cybersecurity and Antifraud Consultant

  • 5
    ctmfile.com

    Posted by ctmfile.com on 3rd Jul 2018

    This is a structured, in-depth review and how to work out how develop the controls and processes that will begin to solve the problem. Knowing what questions to ask is the starting point. The level of questions and analysis required will surprise, but this level of details is essential.

  • 5
    Thank you. We will be offering your self assessment as a subject for our master students from autumn onwards.

    Posted by Christine R. on 3rd Jul 2018

    Christine R. University Officer