Attention all Agile Testing professionals and businesses!
Are you tired of spending countless hours sifting through endless information to prioritize testing requirements for your Agile projects? Look no further than the Agile Testing Knowledge Base.
Our dataset consists of the top 1519 Agile Testing requirements, solutions, and benefits, all prioritized by urgency and scope.
With our resource, you will save valuable time and effort by having the most important questions already compiled for you.
But that′s not all – our dataset also includes real-world case studies and use cases, showing how Agile Testing has successfully been implemented in various industries.
You can trust that our information is tried and tested, providing you with proven and practical solutions.
Compared to our competitors and alternatives, the Agile Testing Knowledge Base shines as the premier resource for Agile professionals.
Our dataset provides comprehensive coverage and depth of knowledge that cannot be found elsewhere.
Plus, our product is accessible and affordable for both individuals and businesses.
You may be wondering how to use our dataset.
It′s simple – just search for your specific Agile Testing needs and let our prioritized requirements guide you towards efficient and effective solutions.
And with our DIY approach, you have the option to tackle testing yourself or hand it off to your team with confidence.
Not only does our dataset provide practical solutions, but it also offers an in-depth look at the benefits of Agile Testing.
From improved project management to faster delivery times, implementing Agile Testing can have a significant impact on your bottom line.
Don′t just take our word for it – extensive research has shown the effectiveness and success of Agile Testing in various organizations.
Stay ahead of the curve and elevate your testing process with the help of the Agile Testing Knowledge Base.
But don′t just consider the benefits – also take into account the cost.
Our dataset is a cost-effective solution for businesses of all sizes, saving you money and resources in the long run.
Of course, like any product, there may be some pros and cons.
Our dataset is constantly evolving and improving, and we welcome feedback from our users to continue providing the most comprehensive and useful information available.
In a nutshell, the Agile Testing Knowledge Base delivers everything you need for successful Agile Testing in one convenient resource.
From prioritized requirements to real-world case studies, this dataset has it all.
Don′t miss out on the opportunity to optimize your Agile testing process and achieve better results – start using the Agile Testing Knowledge Base today.
When should you enhance your whole team testing efforts with an independent test group? What does Agile testing look like and how do you increase agility in your teams? What is Agile testing to your organization and what is the importance of Agile testing?
Agile Testing
Enhancing the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group can provide a fresh perspective and improve the overall quality of testing in an agile project.
1. Solution: Increase collaboration between developers and testers through pair programming.
Benefit: An independent test group may not be necessary as both parties can work together effectively.
2. Solution: Use test-driven development (TDD) to ensure code is thoroughly tested during development.
Benefit: This reduces the need for an independent test group as issues are caught and fixed earlier in the process.
3. Solution: Implement continuous integration to constantly test and integrate code changes.
Benefit: This helps identify issues early on, reducing the need for an independent test group to catch them later.
4. Solution: Use exploratory testing techniques to quickly find and fix bugs in an agile environment.
Benefit: This allows for rapid and continuous testing without the need for a separate testing group.
5. Solution: Incorporate automation testing to reduce manual testing efforts and improve coverage.
Benefit: This can decrease the need for an independent test group, as automated tests can run continuously and catch defects.
6. Solution: Introduce testing tools and frameworks within the development team′s skillset.
Benefit: This empowers the whole team to contribute to testing efforts, reducing the need for a separate test group.
7. Solution: Implement an agile testing approach where testing is done collaboratively throughout the development cycle.
Benefit: This integrates testing into the entire team′s responsibilities, making an independent test group unnecessary.
8. Solution: Have regular, cross-functional retrospectives to assess testing processes and make improvements.
Benefit: This can help identify areas where the whole team can improve their testing efforts, reducing the need for an independent group.
9. Solution: Create a culture of quality within the team by emphasizing the importance of testing.
Benefit: This ensures that testing is seen as a responsibility of the entire team, eliminating the need for an independent group.
10. Solution: Utilize the skills and knowledge of experienced testers to train and mentor the entire team.
Benefit: This can improve the testing skills of the whole team, decreasing the need for an independent test group.
CONTROL QUESTION: When should you enhance the whole team testing efforts with an independent test group?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, my big hairy audacious goal for Agile Testing would be to have the whole team testing approach so integrated into the development process that there would no longer be a need for an independent test group.
The whole team testing concept requires every member of the development team to take responsibility for quality and testing, thereby eliminating the need for a separate testing group. This not only ensures more efficient and effective testing but also promotes a collaborative and cohesive team environment.
However, I understand that it may not always be feasible to completely eliminate the role of an independent test group. In such cases, my goal would be to only involve an independent test group when necessary for certain specialized or critical testing activities. This would involve setting up clear guidelines and communication channels between the whole team and the independent test group to ensure smooth coordination and seamless integration of their efforts.
The ultimate aim of this goal is to have a streamlined and fully aligned development and testing process, where the entire team is equally responsible for the quality of the product, and testing is not seen as a separate phase or activity. This would lead to faster delivery of high-quality products, increased customer satisfaction, and a culture of continuous improvement within the organization.
Overall, my 10-year goal for Agile Testing would be to achieve a truly agile and cross-functional development and testing approach, where the boundaries between developers and testers are blurred, and everyone shares a common goal of delivering top-notch products.
"I used this dataset to personalize my e-commerce website, and the results have been fantastic! Conversion rates have skyrocketed, and customer satisfaction is through the roof."
Introduction
The field of software development has evolved significantly over the years, with various methodologies and frameworks emerging to streamline and improve the process. One of the most popular approaches is Agile testing, which emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and continuous delivery of high-quality software. Agile testing focuses on involving the whole team in the testing process, rather than having a separate test group.
However, in some situations, it may be necessary to enhance the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group. This case study analyzes why and when such a decision should be made, considering the client situation, consulting methodology, deliverables, implementation challenges, KPIs, and other management considerations.
Client Situation
The client is a mid-sized software development company with approximately 50 employees. The company′s primary focus is developing customized solutions for clients in various industries. Due to the fast-paced nature of the industry, the company adopted the Agile methodology for software development to improve their speed, flexibility, and collaboration.
The company has been following the Agile approach for a year now and has seen significant improvements in its development process. However, the management team has noticed that there have been some issues with the quality of the delivered software. Despite involving the whole team in the testing process, there have been several instances where bugs and defects have been identified by clients after the software has been deployed. As a result, the company′s reputation and customer satisfaction have been affected.
Consulting Methodology
To address this problem, the company decides to engage a consulting firm to analyze their current testing practices and suggest improvements. The consulting firm follows the following methodology to come up with a recommendation:
1. Analysis of Current Testing Practices: The first step involves understanding the current testing practices at the client′s organization. This includes reviewing their testing processes, tools, and techniques.
2. Gap Analysis: A gap analysis is performed to identify any areas where the current testing practices may not be sufficient. This involves comparing the client′s practices with industry standards and best practices.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: The consulting firm conducts interviews with key stakeholders, including the development team, testing team (if any), project managers, and clients, to get their input on the current testing efforts and identify any issues or concerns they may have.
4. Risk Assessment: A risk assessment is performed to identify the potential risks associated with the current testing practices and their impact on the company′s operations and reputation.
5. Agile Best Practices Review: The consulting firm reviews industry-standard Agile testing best practices and identifies any specific practices that could benefit the client′s situation.
6. Cost-Benefit Analysis: The final step involves conducting a cost-benefit analysis to understand the potential costs and benefits of enhancing the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group.
Deliverables
Based on the above methodology, the consulting firm provides the following deliverables to the client:
1. Current Testing Practices Report: This report includes an overview of the client′s current testing practices, along with any identified gaps and potential risks.
2. Stakeholder Interview Report: A detailed report summarizing the feedback and concerns of the key stakeholders.
3. Agile Best Practices Recommendations: A list of recommended Agile testing practices that could improve the client′s testing efforts.
4. Cost-Benefit Analysis Report: A report outlining the potential costs and benefits of enhancing the testing efforts with an independent test group.
Implementation Challenges
The implementation of an independent test group can face several challenges, including:
1. Resistance from the Whole Team: The primary challenge will be convincing the whole team to embrace the idea of an independent test group. As per the Agile methodology, the whole team is responsible for the quality of the software. Therefore, they may see the introduction of an independent test group as a lack of trust in their abilities.
2. Integration with Agile Principles: The implementation of an independent test group may be seen as going against the principles of Agile, which emphasize whole team collaboration and self-organizing teams.
3. Additional Resource Allocation: The company may need to allocate additional resources towards the independent test group, including hiring more testers and investing in testing tools and infrastructure.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To monitor the success of the implementation of an independent test group, the following KPIs can be used:
1. Defect Detection Rate: This measures the number of defects identified during the testing process compared to the total number of defects reported by clients after software deployment.
2. Customer Satisfaction: This KPI measures customer satisfaction after implementing the independent test group. It can be measured through surveys or feedback forms.
3. Time to Market: This measures the time it takes to deliver new software after implementing the independent test group. A decrease in this metric would indicate improved testing efficiency.
4. Test Coverage: This measures the percentage of the code that is being tested. A higher test coverage would indicate a more comprehensive testing approach.
Management Considerations
The decision to enhance the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group should not be taken lightly. Some management considerations include:
1. Change Management: The implementation of an independent test group is a significant change for the organization and requires proper communication and management to ensure a smooth transition.
2. Training and Education: The whole team, as well as the independent test group, will require training and education on Agile principles and practices, as well as how to work effectively together.
3. Budget and Resource Allocation: As mentioned before, implementing an independent test group will require additional resources and budget allocation. This needs to be carefully planned and managed to ensure its effectiveness.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the Agile methodology promotes whole team involvement in the testing process, there may be situations where it is beneficial to enhance the testing efforts with an independent test group. This case study provides a framework for making this decision and highlights the key considerations, challenges, and KPIs that should be taken into account. By following a thorough methodology and considering various factors, organizations can improve their testing efforts and deliver high-quality software to their clients.
Are you tired of spending countless hours sifting through endless information to prioritize testing requirements for your Agile projects? Look no further than the Agile Testing Knowledge Base.
Our dataset consists of the top 1519 Agile Testing requirements, solutions, and benefits, all prioritized by urgency and scope.
With our resource, you will save valuable time and effort by having the most important questions already compiled for you.
But that′s not all – our dataset also includes real-world case studies and use cases, showing how Agile Testing has successfully been implemented in various industries.
You can trust that our information is tried and tested, providing you with proven and practical solutions.
Compared to our competitors and alternatives, the Agile Testing Knowledge Base shines as the premier resource for Agile professionals.
Our dataset provides comprehensive coverage and depth of knowledge that cannot be found elsewhere.
Plus, our product is accessible and affordable for both individuals and businesses.
You may be wondering how to use our dataset.
It′s simple – just search for your specific Agile Testing needs and let our prioritized requirements guide you towards efficient and effective solutions.
And with our DIY approach, you have the option to tackle testing yourself or hand it off to your team with confidence.
Not only does our dataset provide practical solutions, but it also offers an in-depth look at the benefits of Agile Testing.
From improved project management to faster delivery times, implementing Agile Testing can have a significant impact on your bottom line.
Don′t just take our word for it – extensive research has shown the effectiveness and success of Agile Testing in various organizations.
Stay ahead of the curve and elevate your testing process with the help of the Agile Testing Knowledge Base.
But don′t just consider the benefits – also take into account the cost.
Our dataset is a cost-effective solution for businesses of all sizes, saving you money and resources in the long run.
Of course, like any product, there may be some pros and cons.
Our dataset is constantly evolving and improving, and we welcome feedback from our users to continue providing the most comprehensive and useful information available.
In a nutshell, the Agile Testing Knowledge Base delivers everything you need for successful Agile Testing in one convenient resource.
From prioritized requirements to real-world case studies, this dataset has it all.
Don′t miss out on the opportunity to optimize your Agile testing process and achieve better results – start using the Agile Testing Knowledge Base today.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1519 prioritized Agile Testing requirements. - Extensive coverage of 113 Agile Testing topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 113 Agile Testing step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 113 Agile Testing case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Application Development, Test Data Management, User Feedback, Product Demo, Definition Of Done, Non Functional Testing, Feature Testing, Non Functional Requirements, Collaborative Environment, Backlog Grooming, Acceptance Criteria, Automated Testing Tools, Agile alignment, Test Planning, End To End Testing, Test Reporting, Risk Assessment, Agile Implementation, Acceptance Testing, Extreme Programming, Agile Transformation, Usability Testing, Cross Functional Teams, Automation Framework, Pair Testing, Integration Testing, Test Design, Sprint Planning, Test Environment Management, Functional Testing, Business Value, Agile Tools, Agile Governance, Waterfall Model, Behavioral Testing, Agile Training, Agile Requirements, Exploratory Testing, Integration Acceptance Testing, Agile Estimation, Test methodologies, Scrum Master, Scrum Methodology, Traceability Matrix, Burn Down Charts, Continuous Delivery, System Testing, Customer Experience Testing, User Acceptance Testing, Feature Prioritization, Agile Principles, Velocity Improvement, Test First Approach, Technical Debt, Data Driven Testing, Agile Retrospectives, Resilient Teams, Behavior Based Testing, Test Execution, Sprint Velocity, UI Testing, Agile Outsourcing, Test Driven Requirements, Feature Driven Development, Code Coverage, Release Planning, User Centered Design, Agile Methodologies, Stakeholder Involvement, Story Points, Test Closure, Regression Test Suites, Velocity Tracking, Scrum Testing, Release Management, Test Driven Development, Agile Contracts, Agile Workshops, Agile Testing, Agile Manifesto, Retrospective Action Items, Performance Testing Strategy, Continuous Testing, Software Quality Assurance, Agile Mindset, Iterative Development, Quality Assurance, User Stories, Code Refactoring, Agile Teams, Test Design Techniques, Product Vision, Regression Testing, Agile Coaches, Pair Programming, Product Backlog, Code Reviews, Defect Management, Test Reporting Tools, Kanban Boards, Sprint Review, Risk Based Testing, Continuous Integration, Customer Collaboration, Incremental Testing, Requirements Gathering, DevOps Integration, Incremental Development, Test Environments, Unit Testing, Test Automation, Agile Metrics, Behavior Driven Development
Agile Testing Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Agile Testing
Enhancing the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group can provide a fresh perspective and improve the overall quality of testing in an agile project.
1. Solution: Increase collaboration between developers and testers through pair programming.
Benefit: An independent test group may not be necessary as both parties can work together effectively.
2. Solution: Use test-driven development (TDD) to ensure code is thoroughly tested during development.
Benefit: This reduces the need for an independent test group as issues are caught and fixed earlier in the process.
3. Solution: Implement continuous integration to constantly test and integrate code changes.
Benefit: This helps identify issues early on, reducing the need for an independent test group to catch them later.
4. Solution: Use exploratory testing techniques to quickly find and fix bugs in an agile environment.
Benefit: This allows for rapid and continuous testing without the need for a separate testing group.
5. Solution: Incorporate automation testing to reduce manual testing efforts and improve coverage.
Benefit: This can decrease the need for an independent test group, as automated tests can run continuously and catch defects.
6. Solution: Introduce testing tools and frameworks within the development team′s skillset.
Benefit: This empowers the whole team to contribute to testing efforts, reducing the need for a separate test group.
7. Solution: Implement an agile testing approach where testing is done collaboratively throughout the development cycle.
Benefit: This integrates testing into the entire team′s responsibilities, making an independent test group unnecessary.
8. Solution: Have regular, cross-functional retrospectives to assess testing processes and make improvements.
Benefit: This can help identify areas where the whole team can improve their testing efforts, reducing the need for an independent group.
9. Solution: Create a culture of quality within the team by emphasizing the importance of testing.
Benefit: This ensures that testing is seen as a responsibility of the entire team, eliminating the need for an independent group.
10. Solution: Utilize the skills and knowledge of experienced testers to train and mentor the entire team.
Benefit: This can improve the testing skills of the whole team, decreasing the need for an independent test group.
CONTROL QUESTION: When should you enhance the whole team testing efforts with an independent test group?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, my big hairy audacious goal for Agile Testing would be to have the whole team testing approach so integrated into the development process that there would no longer be a need for an independent test group.
The whole team testing concept requires every member of the development team to take responsibility for quality and testing, thereby eliminating the need for a separate testing group. This not only ensures more efficient and effective testing but also promotes a collaborative and cohesive team environment.
However, I understand that it may not always be feasible to completely eliminate the role of an independent test group. In such cases, my goal would be to only involve an independent test group when necessary for certain specialized or critical testing activities. This would involve setting up clear guidelines and communication channels between the whole team and the independent test group to ensure smooth coordination and seamless integration of their efforts.
The ultimate aim of this goal is to have a streamlined and fully aligned development and testing process, where the entire team is equally responsible for the quality of the product, and testing is not seen as a separate phase or activity. This would lead to faster delivery of high-quality products, increased customer satisfaction, and a culture of continuous improvement within the organization.
Overall, my 10-year goal for Agile Testing would be to achieve a truly agile and cross-functional development and testing approach, where the boundaries between developers and testers are blurred, and everyone shares a common goal of delivering top-notch products.
Customer Testimonials:
"I used this dataset to personalize my e-commerce website, and the results have been fantastic! Conversion rates have skyrocketed, and customer satisfaction is through the roof."
"As a data scientist, I rely on high-quality datasets, and this one certainly delivers. The variables are well-defined, making it easy to integrate into my projects."
"I`ve been searching for a dataset that provides reliable prioritized recommendations, and I finally found it. The accuracy and depth of insights have exceeded my expectations. A must-have for professionals!"
Agile Testing Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction
The field of software development has evolved significantly over the years, with various methodologies and frameworks emerging to streamline and improve the process. One of the most popular approaches is Agile testing, which emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and continuous delivery of high-quality software. Agile testing focuses on involving the whole team in the testing process, rather than having a separate test group.
However, in some situations, it may be necessary to enhance the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group. This case study analyzes why and when such a decision should be made, considering the client situation, consulting methodology, deliverables, implementation challenges, KPIs, and other management considerations.
Client Situation
The client is a mid-sized software development company with approximately 50 employees. The company′s primary focus is developing customized solutions for clients in various industries. Due to the fast-paced nature of the industry, the company adopted the Agile methodology for software development to improve their speed, flexibility, and collaboration.
The company has been following the Agile approach for a year now and has seen significant improvements in its development process. However, the management team has noticed that there have been some issues with the quality of the delivered software. Despite involving the whole team in the testing process, there have been several instances where bugs and defects have been identified by clients after the software has been deployed. As a result, the company′s reputation and customer satisfaction have been affected.
Consulting Methodology
To address this problem, the company decides to engage a consulting firm to analyze their current testing practices and suggest improvements. The consulting firm follows the following methodology to come up with a recommendation:
1. Analysis of Current Testing Practices: The first step involves understanding the current testing practices at the client′s organization. This includes reviewing their testing processes, tools, and techniques.
2. Gap Analysis: A gap analysis is performed to identify any areas where the current testing practices may not be sufficient. This involves comparing the client′s practices with industry standards and best practices.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: The consulting firm conducts interviews with key stakeholders, including the development team, testing team (if any), project managers, and clients, to get their input on the current testing efforts and identify any issues or concerns they may have.
4. Risk Assessment: A risk assessment is performed to identify the potential risks associated with the current testing practices and their impact on the company′s operations and reputation.
5. Agile Best Practices Review: The consulting firm reviews industry-standard Agile testing best practices and identifies any specific practices that could benefit the client′s situation.
6. Cost-Benefit Analysis: The final step involves conducting a cost-benefit analysis to understand the potential costs and benefits of enhancing the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group.
Deliverables
Based on the above methodology, the consulting firm provides the following deliverables to the client:
1. Current Testing Practices Report: This report includes an overview of the client′s current testing practices, along with any identified gaps and potential risks.
2. Stakeholder Interview Report: A detailed report summarizing the feedback and concerns of the key stakeholders.
3. Agile Best Practices Recommendations: A list of recommended Agile testing practices that could improve the client′s testing efforts.
4. Cost-Benefit Analysis Report: A report outlining the potential costs and benefits of enhancing the testing efforts with an independent test group.
Implementation Challenges
The implementation of an independent test group can face several challenges, including:
1. Resistance from the Whole Team: The primary challenge will be convincing the whole team to embrace the idea of an independent test group. As per the Agile methodology, the whole team is responsible for the quality of the software. Therefore, they may see the introduction of an independent test group as a lack of trust in their abilities.
2. Integration with Agile Principles: The implementation of an independent test group may be seen as going against the principles of Agile, which emphasize whole team collaboration and self-organizing teams.
3. Additional Resource Allocation: The company may need to allocate additional resources towards the independent test group, including hiring more testers and investing in testing tools and infrastructure.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To monitor the success of the implementation of an independent test group, the following KPIs can be used:
1. Defect Detection Rate: This measures the number of defects identified during the testing process compared to the total number of defects reported by clients after software deployment.
2. Customer Satisfaction: This KPI measures customer satisfaction after implementing the independent test group. It can be measured through surveys or feedback forms.
3. Time to Market: This measures the time it takes to deliver new software after implementing the independent test group. A decrease in this metric would indicate improved testing efficiency.
4. Test Coverage: This measures the percentage of the code that is being tested. A higher test coverage would indicate a more comprehensive testing approach.
Management Considerations
The decision to enhance the whole team′s testing efforts with an independent test group should not be taken lightly. Some management considerations include:
1. Change Management: The implementation of an independent test group is a significant change for the organization and requires proper communication and management to ensure a smooth transition.
2. Training and Education: The whole team, as well as the independent test group, will require training and education on Agile principles and practices, as well as how to work effectively together.
3. Budget and Resource Allocation: As mentioned before, implementing an independent test group will require additional resources and budget allocation. This needs to be carefully planned and managed to ensure its effectiveness.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the Agile methodology promotes whole team involvement in the testing process, there may be situations where it is beneficial to enhance the testing efforts with an independent test group. This case study provides a framework for making this decision and highlights the key considerations, challenges, and KPIs that should be taken into account. By following a thorough methodology and considering various factors, organizations can improve their testing efforts and deliver high-quality software to their clients.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
