A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering AI Act for LLM Governance Practitioners
Build defensible, auditable AI governance frameworks with structured reasoning and source-backed decisions
The situation this course is for
LLM governance is moving from informal oversight to formal review. Practitioners who relied on tribal knowledge are now asked to justify choices, often without a structured framework or documented rationale. This creates friction when escalating incidents or proposing controls.
Who this is for
IC-level engineer or technical specialist managing LLM operations in a regulated or scaling environment, focused on governance, reliability, and audit readiness
Who this is not for
Executives seeking high-level AI strategy, entry-level engineers without governance exposure, or practitioners outside AI/ML infrastructure
What you walk away with
- Map AI Act requirements directly to LLM control points in deployment, monitoring, and review
- Construct defensible rationale for model access, versioning, and rollback decisions
- Document control implementations with source-backed justification for auditors and peers
- Anticipate challenges to LLM policies using precedent from EU AI Office guidance
- Deliver repeatable governance artefacts that survive team changes and leadership shifts
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Scope of AI Act
- Definition of AI system
- LLM as general-purpose AI
- High-risk determination
- Provider vs deployer roles
- Extraterritorial effect
- Sector-specific implications
- Compliance deadlines
- Member state enforcement
- Voluntary codes of practice
- Risk tier mapping
- Exemptions for research
- Obligations of providers
- Duties of deployers
- Third-party integration risks
- Human-in-the-loop definition
- Role assignment framework
- Accountability mapping
- Compliance officer mandate
- Training requirements
- Change logging
- Incident reporting chain
- Internal audit readiness
- Documentation standards
- Hazard identification
- Severity classification
- Likelihood estimation
- Risk register design
- Mitigation hierarchy
- Model card integration
- Output filtering
- Drift detection
- Feedback loop design
- Escalation thresholds
- Remediation protocols
- Third-party validation
- Data lineage tracking
- Bias assessment methods
- Synthetic data use
- Personal data handling
- Data set documentation
- Versioning policies
- Sourcing transparency
- Annotation standards
- Data refresh cycles
- Data drift monitoring
- Retention rules
- Audit trail design
- System overview
- Intended use definition
- Architecture diagrams
- Performance metrics
- Uncertainty estimates
- Input output specs
- Version history
- Update process
- Security measures
- Testing results
- Failure modes
- Maintenance logs
- User notification
- Deepfake labeling
- Output watermarking
- Discrimination warnings
- Language clarity
- Accessibility needs
- Multilingual support
- Consent mechanisms
- Logging user interactions
- Feedback capture
- Transparency reports
- Public register submission
- Oversight timing
- Reviewer qualifications
- Escalation paths
- Intervention rights
- Logging review actions
- Automated flagging
- Risk-based sampling
- Training programs
- Performance tracking
- Bias detection
- Appeal process
- Audit readiness
- Threat modeling
- Adversarial testing
- Model retraining
- Prompt injection defense
- Output validation
- Latency monitoring
- Fallback mechanisms
- Security patching
- Penetration testing
- Monitoring alerts
- Incident response
- Recovery procedures
- Self-assessment steps
- Notified body selection
- Technical file submission
- Certification timing
- Post-market surveillance
- Change impact review
- Incident documentation
- Complaint handling
- Audit preparation
- Non-compliance response
- Withdrawal procedures
- International alignment
- Log retention duration
- Access control
- Data integrity
- Timestamping
- Immutable storage
- Audit trail design
- Query support
- Incident documentation
- Version linkage
- Automated reporting
- Retention policies
- Cross-border transfer
- Policy drafting
- Control mapping
- Team onboarding
- Stakeholder review
- Version control
- Change request process
- Training delivery
- Compliance monitoring
- KPIs and metrics
- Remediation tracking
- Lessons learned
- Continuous improvement
- Peer review simulation
- Regulator Q&A
- Board-level explanation
- Incident post-mortem
- Cross-functional debate
- External audit prep
- Public scrutiny handling
- Legal defense prep
- Lessons from enforcement
- Precedent database
- Argument structuring
- Source citation
How this maps to your situation
- Classifying own LLMs under AI Act
- Responding to internal compliance review
- Preparing for external audit
- Advocating for control changes in technical meetings
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside active work commitments over 4-6 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or vendor-specific tool training, this course delivers structured, jurisdictionally relevant reasoning patterns tied directly to AI Act obligations , giving you the depth to justify decisions under scrutiny.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.