A tailored course, built for your situation
AI Governance for Risk and Compliance Teams
Govern generative AI adoption with confidence, clarity, and control
The situation this course is for
Teams are deploying generative AI tools independently, creating blind spots in data security, regulatory compliance, and ethical use. Governance teams are expected to respond, but lack practical frameworks tailored to fast-moving AI risks. Without clear policies, oversight mechanisms, and alignment with existing controls, organizations face reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and operational drift.
Who this is for
Risk officers, compliance leads, and governance professionals in mid-to-large organizations adopting AI at scale
Who this is not for
Individual contributors without policy influence, technical AI developers, or teams focused only on model accuracy or infrastructure
What you walk away with
- Build an AI governance framework aligned with NIST, ISO, and sector-specific regulations
- Implement audit-ready controls for AI usage across departments
- Map AI risk to existing compliance frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX
- Establish monitoring protocols for ethical AI use and bias mitigation
- Create a defensible AI oversight function that scales with adoption
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- AI adoption trends in 2025
- Common use cases by department
- Shadow AI in the wild
- Regulatory scrutiny rising
- High-profile AI failures
- Sector-specific exposure
- Vendor AI vs in-house models
- Employee-driven AI use
- Data leakage risks
- Model hallucination impacts
- Compliance blind spots
- The cost of inaction
- What governance means for AI
- Ethics vs compliance
- Risk-based framing
- Governance vs oversight
- Core principles defined
- Accountability frameworks
- Roles and responsibilities
- Policy ownership
- Cross-functional alignment
- Enforcement mechanisms
- Escalation paths
- Documentation standards
- GDPR and AI profiling
- HIPAA in AI workflows
- SOX controls and AI
- CCPA implications
- NIST AI RMF alignment
- EU AI Act tiers
- Sector-specific rules
- Cross-border data flows
- Audit trail requirements
- Model transparency rules
- Bias and fairness laws
- Recordkeeping mandates
- Risk scoring framework
- Impact level definitions
- Data sensitivity tiers
- Autonomy levels
- Third-party model risks
- Fine-tuning considerations
- Model lifecycle stages
- Use case categorization
- Risk threshold setting
- Approval workflows
- Documentation templates
- Review cadence planning
- Acceptable use policy
- Employee responsibilities
- Prohibited use cases
- Approved tools list
- Vendor AI governance
- Model documentation
- Data handling rules
- Security requirements
- Incident reporting
- Policy enforcement
- Training obligations
- Review and update cycle
- Monitoring scope definition
- Tool discovery methods
- Network traffic analysis
- Cloud usage tracking
- Model performance logs
- Bias detection tools
- Human review triggers
- Anomaly detection
- Compliance dashboards
- Audit logging
- Alerting protocols
- Remediation workflows
- AI incident types
- Hallucination response
- Bias exposure protocol
- Data leak containment
- Regulatory inquiry prep
- Legal hold procedures
- Stakeholder comms
- Root cause analysis
- Remediation tracking
- Escalation paths
- Post-mortem process
- Reporting templates
- Vendor risk tiers
- Due diligence checklist
- AI-specific SLAs
- Model transparency
- Data ownership terms
- Audit rights
- Subprocessor tracking
- Compliance certifications
- Contractual safeguards
- Ongoing monitoring
- Exit strategies
- Vendor offboarding
- Ethical principles
- Bias types defined
- Fairness metrics
- Disparate impact
- Model fairness testing
- Bias detection tools
- Human review process
- Appeals mechanism
- Transparency reporting
- Stakeholder feedback
- Bias remediation
- Ethics review board
- Audit readiness checklist
- Control mapping
- Evidence collection
- Self-assessment process
- Third-party audits
- Regulatory exams
- Findings response
- Compliance dashboards
- Audit trail setup
- Documentation standards
- Remediation tracking
- Continuous assurance
- Governance team scope
- Staffing models
- Budget justification
- Stakeholder alignment
- Cross-functional teams
- Reporting structure
- KPIs and metrics
- Maturity model
- Executive reporting
- Training programs
- External partnerships
- Continuous improvement
- Scaling challenges
- Automation opportunities
- Policy versioning
- AI registry setup
- Model inventory
- Lifecycle management
- Continuous monitoring
- Feedback loops
- Emerging tech watch
- GenAI evolution
- Autonomous systems
- Future governance needs
How this maps to your situation
- Your organization adopts AI tools without governance
- Compliance team lacks AI-specific controls
- Regulators increase scrutiny on AI use
- Leadership demands oversight framework
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 2 hours per module, designed to be completed at your pace over 6, 8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or technical model audits, this program delivers actionable governance playbooks specifically for compliance and risk professionals , not data scientists.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.