Attention all professionals tasked with ensuring compliance and mitigating risks in their organizations.
Are you tired of sifting through endless information and struggling to prioritize urgent compliance requirements? Look no further, as we introduce the ultimate solution for Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance knowledge – our curated Knowledge Base.
Our Knowledge Base consists of 1531 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies related to Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance, making it the most comprehensive and efficient dataset on the market.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to compliance, which is why our Knowledge Base is designed to help you quickly identify the most important questions to ask and get results by urgency and scope.
But what truly sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our commitment to providing unparalleled value to our users.
Our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base is designed specifically for professionals like you, providing an easy-to-use, do-it-yourself alternative to expensive and complicated compliance software.
Our detailed product specifications and overview make it simple to navigate and utilize, even for those with limited technical experience.
Not only that, our product offers tangible benefits to your organization.
By utilizing our Knowledge Base, you can ensure a more streamlined and effective approach to compliance, ultimately saving valuable time and resources for your business.
Our rigorous research on Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance guarantees the most up-to-date and relevant information at your fingertips, giving you peace of mind that your compliance efforts are thorough and comprehensive.
Do not let the high cost and complexity of other compliance solutions hold you back.
Our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base is affordable, user-friendly, and tailored for businesses of all sizes.
Don′t just take our word for it – hear from our satisfied customers who have achieved success through using our Knowledge Base and implemented our best practices.
In today′s fast-paced business landscape, being compliant and risk-averse is crucial for success.
Let our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base be your trusted companion in navigating the complex world of compliance.
Contact us now to learn more and see how we can help your business thrive!
What should your organization check for when conducting an anti corruption risk assessment of high risk suppliers? What role do senior management play in your organizations anti bribery and corruption effort? How does your organization remediate the adverse impacts related to grand corruption in the supply chain?
Anti Corruption
Organizations should assess high risk suppliers for potential conflicts of interest, bribery, and adherence to ethical standards and legal regulations.
1) Conduct thorough due diligence on potential suppliers to ensure they have a clean record.
2) Implement a robust anti-corruption policy and code of conduct for all suppliers.
3) Regularly monitor and audit high-risk suppliers for compliance with anti-corruption policies.
4) Offer regular training and awareness programs to suppliers on anti-corruption measures.
5) Implement a whistle-blowing policy to encourage reporting of any corrupt behavior.
6) Utilize third-party risk management tools to screen suppliers and identify any red flags.
7) Establish clear consequences for suppliers who engage in corrupt activities.
8) Develop a contingency plan to mitigate the impact of any corruption-related disruptions.
9) Collaborate with other organizations and share best practices for preventing corruption.
10) Continuously review and update anti-corruption policies to adapt to changing risks and regulations.
CONTROL QUESTION: What should the organization check for when conducting an anti corruption risk assessment of high risk suppliers?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, our goal for Anti Corruption is to achieve a world where corruption has been significantly reduced and government and business practices are transparent and ethical.
When conducting an anti-corruption risk assessment of high-risk suppliers, the organization should first establish a thorough and comprehensive due diligence process. This should include reviewing the supplier’s business practices and financial operations, as well as any past incidents or allegations of corruption.
The organization should also check for potential red flags such as connections to government officials or political parties, unclear ownership structures, and unusual financial arrangements. Additionally, the organization should make sure that the supplier has proper compliance policies and procedures in place.
Furthermore, the organization should consider the supplier’s industry and geographical location, as certain industries and regions may have a higher risk of corruption. It may also be helpful to gather information from credible sources, such as anti-corruption agencies or NGOs, to gain a better understanding of the supplier’s reputation and potential risks.
Regular and ongoing monitoring of high-risk suppliers is crucial to ensure compliance and identify any changes that may increase the risk of corruption. The organization should also have a clear plan in place for addressing any potential violations or breaches of anti-corruption laws or policies.
By diligently identifying and managing corruption risks with high-risk suppliers, our organization can play a vital role in creating a more transparent and ethical business environment, ultimately contributing to our vision of a corruption-free world.
"I am thoroughly impressed with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are backed by solid data, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. A must-have for anyone serious about data analysis!"
Case Study: Conducing an Anti-Corruption Risk Assessment of High Risk Suppliers
Synopsis of Client Situation:
Our client is a multinational corporation that operates in the healthcare industry, with a presence in several emerging markets. As a leading player in the industry, the company has a strict policy against corruption and follows international anti-corruption laws such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act. However, due to the nature of their operations in some high-risk markets, the company has identified a need to conduct an anti-corruption risk assessment of their high-risk suppliers. The client is concerned about potential reputational and financial risks associated with engaging with these suppliers and wants to ensure compliance with their anti-corruption policies and regulations.
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting firm has been engaged to conduct an anti-corruption risk assessment for high-risk suppliers. Our methodology for this project includes the following key steps:
1. Stakeholder Engagement: Our initial step will be to engage with relevant stakeholders such as senior management, legal and compliance teams, procurement teams, and other key personnel involved in supplier selection and management. This will provide us with a better understanding of the client′s business operations, supplier management processes, and current controls in place to mitigate corruption risks.
2. Risk Identification: We will next identify and assess the potential corruption risks associated with the client′s high-risk suppliers. These risks can range from bribery and kickbacks to money laundering and conflict of interest. We will use various tools and techniques such as interviews, surveys, and document reviews to identify these risks.
3. Risk Evaluation: Once the risks are identified, we will evaluate them based on the likelihood and potential impact on the client′s operations and reputation. The risks will be prioritized based on their significance, and a risk matrix will be developed to guide the subsequent steps.
4. Current Controls Assessment: We will assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the current controls in place to mitigate the identified risks. This will involve a review of policies, procedures, training programs, and other relevant documents. We will also conduct interviews with key personnel to understand their awareness and understanding of anti-corruption policies and procedures.
5. Gap Analysis: Based on the results of our risk assessment and control evaluation, we will identify any gaps or weaknesses in the client′s current anti-corruption program. These gaps will be mapped to the corresponding risks to highlight the areas that require improvement.
6. Recommendations: We will provide specific recommendations to address the identified gaps and strengthen the client′s anti-corruption program. These recommendations may include enhancements to policies and procedures, training programs, due diligence processes, and the implementation of additional controls.
Deliverables:
1. Risk Assessment Report: A comprehensive report outlining the results of the risk assessment, including identified risks, their potential impact and likelihood, and a risk matrix.
2. Control Assessment Report: A report detailing the adequacy and effectiveness of current controls in mitigating corruption risks.
3. Gap Analysis Report: A report highlighting the gaps and weaknesses in the client′s current anti-corruption program.
4. Recommendations Report: A report outlining specific recommendations to address the identified gaps and strengthen the client′s anti-corruption program.
Implementation Challenges:
1. Resistance to Change: One of the main challenges in implementing the recommended changes may be resistance from stakeholders who are not familiar with anti-corruption policies and procedures. This could lead to pushback and delays in implementation.
2. Lack of Resources: Implementing new controls and processes may require additional resources in terms of time, money, and personnel. The client may face challenges in allocating these resources towards the anti-corruption initiatives.
3. Supplier Cooperation: The success of the anti-corruption program also relies on the cooperation of high-risk suppliers. If they refuse to comply with the client′s anti-corruption policies, the effectiveness of the program may be compromised.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
1. Percentage of Non-compliant Suppliers: A key performance indicator for the anti-corruption program would be the percentage of non-compliant suppliers before and after implementing the recommended changes. This would reflect the effectiveness of the program in managing corruption risks.
2. Number of Corruption Incidents: Another KPI would be the number of corruption incidents reported by high-risk suppliers before and after the implementation of the anti-corruption program. This would provide an overview of the program′s impact on mitigating the identified risks.
3. Training Completion Rate: The percentage of employees who have completed anti-corruption training is also an important KPI to monitor. This would indicate the level of awareness and understanding of anti-corruption policies and procedures among employees.
Management should also consider providing ongoing training and monitoring to ensure the sustainability of the anti-corruption program. Furthermore, it is essential to regularly review and update policies and procedures to address any changing risks and regulations.
Conclusion:
Conducting an anti-corruption risk assessment of high-risk suppliers is a critical step towards ensuring compliance with international laws and regulations. With our detailed methodology, comprehensive deliverables, and appropriate KPIs, our consulting firm will assist our client in identifying and mitigating corruption risks associated with their suppliers. By implementing our recommendations, the client will have a more robust anti-corruption program, which not only protects their reputation but also strengthens their ethical and compliant business practices.
Citations:
- Rahman, M.S., Haque, M., Mamun, S.A.A., & Uddin, M. (2019). Anti-Corruption Compliance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from U.K. (Firms) Bribery Act 2010. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(1), 42-61.
- Garrity, K. & Matkin, D.T. (2013). Conducting Risk Assessments to Detect Compromises and Corruption in IT procurement. Journal of Business and Management, 19(1), 1-16.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). Anti-Corruption Compliance Program: Essentials for Middle Market. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/industries-middle-market/library/pdf/pwc-anti-corruption-compliance-essentials-for-middle-market-organization.pdf
Are you tired of sifting through endless information and struggling to prioritize urgent compliance requirements? Look no further, as we introduce the ultimate solution for Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance knowledge – our curated Knowledge Base.
Our Knowledge Base consists of 1531 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies related to Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance, making it the most comprehensive and efficient dataset on the market.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to compliance, which is why our Knowledge Base is designed to help you quickly identify the most important questions to ask and get results by urgency and scope.
But what truly sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our commitment to providing unparalleled value to our users.
Our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base is designed specifically for professionals like you, providing an easy-to-use, do-it-yourself alternative to expensive and complicated compliance software.
Our detailed product specifications and overview make it simple to navigate and utilize, even for those with limited technical experience.
Not only that, our product offers tangible benefits to your organization.
By utilizing our Knowledge Base, you can ensure a more streamlined and effective approach to compliance, ultimately saving valuable time and resources for your business.
Our rigorous research on Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance guarantees the most up-to-date and relevant information at your fingertips, giving you peace of mind that your compliance efforts are thorough and comprehensive.
Do not let the high cost and complexity of other compliance solutions hold you back.
Our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base is affordable, user-friendly, and tailored for businesses of all sizes.
Don′t just take our word for it – hear from our satisfied customers who have achieved success through using our Knowledge Base and implemented our best practices.
In today′s fast-paced business landscape, being compliant and risk-averse is crucial for success.
Let our Anti Corruption and Governance Risk and Compliance Knowledge Base be your trusted companion in navigating the complex world of compliance.
Contact us now to learn more and see how we can help your business thrive!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1531 prioritized Anti Corruption requirements. - Extensive coverage of 138 Anti Corruption topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 138 Anti Corruption step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 138 Anti Corruption case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Role Of The Board, Disaster Tolerance, Enterprise Wide Risk, Fraud Response, Data Accuracy, Business Continuity Governance, Ethics Training, IT Governance, Conflicts Of Interest, Board Oversight, Enterprise Risk Management, Anti Money Laundering, Corporate Governance, Governance Risk and Compliance, Compliance Frameworks, Risk Management Process, Whistleblower Protection, App Store Compliance, Risk Tolerance, Regulatory Reporting, Diversity And Inclusion, Risk Ownership, ERP Compliance, Consumer Protection, Compliance Reviews, Business Process Redesign, Technology Regulation, Risk Communication, Corporate Values, Risk Assessment, Corporate Governance Regulations, Supplier Compliance, Anti Corruption, Contractual Disputes, Effective Oversight, External Auditors, Strategic Planning, Supervisory Board, Time Based Estimates, Security Controls, Compliance Standards, RPA Governance, Anti Bribery, Cybersecurity Metrics, Third Party Risk Management, Data Classification, Audit Quality, Privacy Laws, Audit Committee, Fraud Prevention, Cyber Risk Management, Internal Audit, Strategic Risk, Ethical Standards, Regulatory Compliance, Governance Structure, Business Transparency, Corporate Social Responsibility, Risk Metrics, Precision Control, Risk Based Approach, Ensuring Access, Due Diligence, Corporate Governance Compliance, Good Governance, Governance risk management systems, Financial Reporting, Real-time Controls, Governance risk reports, Committee Charters, Data Governance Data Governance Communication, Conflict Management, ITIL Compliance, Customer Needs Discovery, Compliance Risks, Business Ethics, Financial Controls, Social Responsibility, Compliance Training, Robotic Control, Audit Function, Code Of Conduct, Cyber Threat, Board Independence, Data Governance Data Retention, Project management standards compliance, Risk Appetite, Governance risk data analysis, Governance risk audits, Compliance Program, Stakeholder Engagement, Compliance Monitoring, Process Efficiency, Data Regulation, Software Applications, Third Party Risk, Whistleblower Hotline, Trade Sanctions, Anti Fraud Measures, Industry Regulations, Collaborative Monitoring, Crisis Management, Executive Remuneration, Code Of Corporate Governance, Risk Governance, Auditor Independence, Data Governance Data Backup, IT Staffing, Risk Identification, Regulatory Changes, Data Governance Framework, Whistleblower Policies, Compliance Culture, Governance Models, Data Retention, IT Risk Management, Business Continuity, Information Governance, Legal Compliance, Accountable Culture, Governance risk factors, Enterprise Risk Management for Banks, Proper Disclosure, Board Accountability, Data Governance Responsibilities, Business Practices, Insider Trading, Conflict Resolution, Sustainability Reporting, Governance risk policies and procedures, Fraud Detection, GRC Policies, Internal Controls, Business Impact Analysis, Ethical Conduct, Internal Control Environment, Code Of Ethics, Board Composition
Anti Corruption Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Anti Corruption
Organizations should assess high risk suppliers for potential conflicts of interest, bribery, and adherence to ethical standards and legal regulations.
1) Conduct thorough due diligence on potential suppliers to ensure they have a clean record.
2) Implement a robust anti-corruption policy and code of conduct for all suppliers.
3) Regularly monitor and audit high-risk suppliers for compliance with anti-corruption policies.
4) Offer regular training and awareness programs to suppliers on anti-corruption measures.
5) Implement a whistle-blowing policy to encourage reporting of any corrupt behavior.
6) Utilize third-party risk management tools to screen suppliers and identify any red flags.
7) Establish clear consequences for suppliers who engage in corrupt activities.
8) Develop a contingency plan to mitigate the impact of any corruption-related disruptions.
9) Collaborate with other organizations and share best practices for preventing corruption.
10) Continuously review and update anti-corruption policies to adapt to changing risks and regulations.
CONTROL QUESTION: What should the organization check for when conducting an anti corruption risk assessment of high risk suppliers?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, our goal for Anti Corruption is to achieve a world where corruption has been significantly reduced and government and business practices are transparent and ethical.
When conducting an anti-corruption risk assessment of high-risk suppliers, the organization should first establish a thorough and comprehensive due diligence process. This should include reviewing the supplier’s business practices and financial operations, as well as any past incidents or allegations of corruption.
The organization should also check for potential red flags such as connections to government officials or political parties, unclear ownership structures, and unusual financial arrangements. Additionally, the organization should make sure that the supplier has proper compliance policies and procedures in place.
Furthermore, the organization should consider the supplier’s industry and geographical location, as certain industries and regions may have a higher risk of corruption. It may also be helpful to gather information from credible sources, such as anti-corruption agencies or NGOs, to gain a better understanding of the supplier’s reputation and potential risks.
Regular and ongoing monitoring of high-risk suppliers is crucial to ensure compliance and identify any changes that may increase the risk of corruption. The organization should also have a clear plan in place for addressing any potential violations or breaches of anti-corruption laws or policies.
By diligently identifying and managing corruption risks with high-risk suppliers, our organization can play a vital role in creating a more transparent and ethical business environment, ultimately contributing to our vision of a corruption-free world.
Customer Testimonials:
"I am thoroughly impressed with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are backed by solid data, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. A must-have for anyone serious about data analysis!"
"This dataset has significantly improved the efficiency of my workflow. The prioritized recommendations are clear and concise, making it easy to identify the most impactful actions. A must-have for analysts!"
"I can`t thank the creators of this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations have streamlined my workflow, and the overall quality of the data is exceptional. A must-have resource for any analyst."
Anti Corruption Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Conducing an Anti-Corruption Risk Assessment of High Risk Suppliers
Synopsis of Client Situation:
Our client is a multinational corporation that operates in the healthcare industry, with a presence in several emerging markets. As a leading player in the industry, the company has a strict policy against corruption and follows international anti-corruption laws such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act. However, due to the nature of their operations in some high-risk markets, the company has identified a need to conduct an anti-corruption risk assessment of their high-risk suppliers. The client is concerned about potential reputational and financial risks associated with engaging with these suppliers and wants to ensure compliance with their anti-corruption policies and regulations.
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting firm has been engaged to conduct an anti-corruption risk assessment for high-risk suppliers. Our methodology for this project includes the following key steps:
1. Stakeholder Engagement: Our initial step will be to engage with relevant stakeholders such as senior management, legal and compliance teams, procurement teams, and other key personnel involved in supplier selection and management. This will provide us with a better understanding of the client′s business operations, supplier management processes, and current controls in place to mitigate corruption risks.
2. Risk Identification: We will next identify and assess the potential corruption risks associated with the client′s high-risk suppliers. These risks can range from bribery and kickbacks to money laundering and conflict of interest. We will use various tools and techniques such as interviews, surveys, and document reviews to identify these risks.
3. Risk Evaluation: Once the risks are identified, we will evaluate them based on the likelihood and potential impact on the client′s operations and reputation. The risks will be prioritized based on their significance, and a risk matrix will be developed to guide the subsequent steps.
4. Current Controls Assessment: We will assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the current controls in place to mitigate the identified risks. This will involve a review of policies, procedures, training programs, and other relevant documents. We will also conduct interviews with key personnel to understand their awareness and understanding of anti-corruption policies and procedures.
5. Gap Analysis: Based on the results of our risk assessment and control evaluation, we will identify any gaps or weaknesses in the client′s current anti-corruption program. These gaps will be mapped to the corresponding risks to highlight the areas that require improvement.
6. Recommendations: We will provide specific recommendations to address the identified gaps and strengthen the client′s anti-corruption program. These recommendations may include enhancements to policies and procedures, training programs, due diligence processes, and the implementation of additional controls.
Deliverables:
1. Risk Assessment Report: A comprehensive report outlining the results of the risk assessment, including identified risks, their potential impact and likelihood, and a risk matrix.
2. Control Assessment Report: A report detailing the adequacy and effectiveness of current controls in mitigating corruption risks.
3. Gap Analysis Report: A report highlighting the gaps and weaknesses in the client′s current anti-corruption program.
4. Recommendations Report: A report outlining specific recommendations to address the identified gaps and strengthen the client′s anti-corruption program.
Implementation Challenges:
1. Resistance to Change: One of the main challenges in implementing the recommended changes may be resistance from stakeholders who are not familiar with anti-corruption policies and procedures. This could lead to pushback and delays in implementation.
2. Lack of Resources: Implementing new controls and processes may require additional resources in terms of time, money, and personnel. The client may face challenges in allocating these resources towards the anti-corruption initiatives.
3. Supplier Cooperation: The success of the anti-corruption program also relies on the cooperation of high-risk suppliers. If they refuse to comply with the client′s anti-corruption policies, the effectiveness of the program may be compromised.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
1. Percentage of Non-compliant Suppliers: A key performance indicator for the anti-corruption program would be the percentage of non-compliant suppliers before and after implementing the recommended changes. This would reflect the effectiveness of the program in managing corruption risks.
2. Number of Corruption Incidents: Another KPI would be the number of corruption incidents reported by high-risk suppliers before and after the implementation of the anti-corruption program. This would provide an overview of the program′s impact on mitigating the identified risks.
3. Training Completion Rate: The percentage of employees who have completed anti-corruption training is also an important KPI to monitor. This would indicate the level of awareness and understanding of anti-corruption policies and procedures among employees.
Management should also consider providing ongoing training and monitoring to ensure the sustainability of the anti-corruption program. Furthermore, it is essential to regularly review and update policies and procedures to address any changing risks and regulations.
Conclusion:
Conducting an anti-corruption risk assessment of high-risk suppliers is a critical step towards ensuring compliance with international laws and regulations. With our detailed methodology, comprehensive deliverables, and appropriate KPIs, our consulting firm will assist our client in identifying and mitigating corruption risks associated with their suppliers. By implementing our recommendations, the client will have a more robust anti-corruption program, which not only protects their reputation but also strengthens their ethical and compliant business practices.
Citations:
- Rahman, M.S., Haque, M., Mamun, S.A.A., & Uddin, M. (2019). Anti-Corruption Compliance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from U.K. (Firms) Bribery Act 2010. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(1), 42-61.
- Garrity, K. & Matkin, D.T. (2013). Conducting Risk Assessments to Detect Compromises and Corruption in IT procurement. Journal of Business and Management, 19(1), 1-16.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). Anti-Corruption Compliance Program: Essentials for Middle Market. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/industries-middle-market/library/pdf/pwc-anti-corruption-compliance-essentials-for-middle-market-organization.pdf
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
