A tailored course, built for your situation
Board-Level AI Procurement Strategy for Established Enterprises
Master the governance, risk, and strategic alignment of enterprise AI sourcing at scale
The situation this course is for
AI initiatives often move fast at the technical level but stall at procurement due to misaligned incentives, unclear risk ownership, and lack of board-level criteria. Legal, IT, and business units work in silos, creating delays, rework, and exposure. Without a unified strategy, organizations overpay, under-deliver, or face reputational and regulatory consequences.
Who this is for
Senior business and technology professionals in established enterprises, strategy leads, procurement officers, CIOs, CISOs, compliance directors, and innovation leads, who are responsible for scaling AI with governance rigor.
Who this is not for
This is not for individual contributors focused only on model development, startup founders managing lean AI adoption, or vendors selling AI tools. It’s for enterprise practitioners leading cross-functional AI rollout with board-level implications.
What you walk away with
- Apply a structured framework to evaluate AI vendors against strategic, technical, and compliance criteria
- Design procurement workflows that align legal, security, and business stakeholders
- Communicate AI sourcing decisions effectively to board members and executives
- Implement risk-tiered contracting strategies for AI services and data usage
- Build a repeatable AI procurement playbook tailored to enterprise complexity
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- From IT buying to strategic AI sourcing
- Why traditional procurement models fail with AI
- The board’s growing role in technology oversight
- Emerging standards in AI governance and sourcing
- Key stakeholders in enterprise AI procurement
- Mapping AI risk to procurement decisions
- The shift from project to portfolio thinking
- Balancing innovation speed and due diligence
- Case study: Global bank adopts AI governance council
- Case study: Healthcare provider standardizes AI vendor review
- Defining success in AI procurement
- Building the business case for strategic sourcing
- Designing an AI governance council
- Integrating procurement into AI ethics committees
- Roles: Sponsor, steward, evaluator, approver
- Escalation paths for high-risk AI use cases
- Aligning with ESG and corporate responsibility goals
- Documenting governance decisions transparently
- Audit readiness for AI procurement processes
- Linking governance to vendor performance monitoring
- Case study: Energy firm creates AI oversight charter
- Case study: Retailer aligns AI sourcing with brand values
- Maintaining governance agility at scale
- Avoiding bureaucracy without sacrificing control
- Principles of risk-based vendor classification
- High-risk vs. medium vs. low-risk AI systems
- Data sensitivity and processing impact assessment
- Third-party model dependency risks
- Evaluating vendor transparency and explainability
- Assessing vendor lock-in and exit strategies
- Open source vs. commercial AI procurement
- Supply chain resilience for AI services
- Case study: Financial services firm tiers 200+ vendors
- Case study: Manufacturer evaluates AI maintenance tools
- Dynamic reclassification based on usage changes
- Documentation standards for risk assessments
- Building a standardized AI vendor scorecard
- Technical deep dive: model training data and bias checks
- Infrastructure and scalability review
- Security and penetration testing expectations
- Reviewing model performance benchmarks
- Assessing vendor incident response maturity
- Evaluating update and versioning practices
- Human oversight and fallback mechanisms
- Case study: Insurer evaluates AI claims processing tools
- Case study: Logistics firm assesses route optimization AI
- Engaging external experts for validation
- Creating a vendor shortlist with justification
- Performance guarantees and service level agreements
- Liability for AI-generated errors or harm
- Data ownership and usage rights negotiation
- Model retraining and drift monitoring obligations
- Audit rights and access to model logs
- Termination clauses for underperformance
- IP rights for fine-tuned or custom models
- Subcontracting and third-party dependencies
- Case study: University negotiates AI tutoring platform
- Case study: Manufacturer secures IP on co-developed AI
- Balancing legal protection with vendor collaboration
- Standardizing contract language across categories
- Subscription vs. usage-based vs. outcome-based pricing
- Hidden costs in AI vendor pricing
- Volume discounts and enterprise agreements
- Benchmarking AI costs across peer organizations
- Negotiating favorable terms for scale
- Cost transparency and reporting requirements
- Pilot-to-production pricing transitions
- Budgeting for ongoing AI maintenance
- Case study: Telecom evaluates AI customer service pricing
- Case study: Bank compares AI fraud detection models
- Aligning spend with risk tier
- Building internal cost allocation models
- Mapping stakeholder interests and influence
- Creating procurement playbooks for different units
- Facilitating joint evaluation sessions
- Resolving conflicts between speed and control
- Communicating procurement timelines and trade-offs
- Building trust between technical and non-technical teams
- Involving HR in AI-augmented workforce planning
- Engaging finance in AI ROI tracking
- Case study: Hospital aligns clinical and IT teams on AI
- Case study: Retailer coordinates marketing and compliance
- Running procurement readiness assessments
- Scaling alignment across global teams
- What boards need to know about AI sourcing
- Reporting risk, value, and progress clearly
- Visualizing AI vendor portfolios and exposure
- Preparing for board-level procurement reviews
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
- Using dashboards for ongoing oversight
- Linking AI procurement to enterprise strategy
- Handling tough questions from directors
- Case study: Board approves AI transformation roadmap
- Case study: Audit committee reviews AI risk inventory
- Creating executive summaries that drive decisions
- Anticipating governance evolution
- Global AI regulation landscape overview
- Mapping compliance requirements to vendor questions
- Preparing for audits and regulatory inquiries
- Aligning with privacy laws (e.g., data subject rights)
- Sector-specific rules: finance, healthcare, education
- Export controls and cross-border data flows
- Transparency and disclosure obligations
- Staying ahead of regulatory change
- Case study: Bank complies with AI guidance from regulator
- Case study: Pharma firm handles AI in clinical trials
- Building compliance into vendor onboarding
- Training procurement teams on legal updates
- Defining organizational AI ethics principles
- Assessing vendor alignment with ethical standards
- Evaluating fairness and bias mitigation practices
- Community and workforce impact assessments
- Environmental impact of AI systems
- Vendor diversity and inclusion commitments
- Whistleblower protections and reporting channels
- Public trust and brand reputation risks
- Case study: City government evaluates AI for social services
- Case study: Tech firm audits AI hiring tool for bias
- Creating ethics review checkpoints
- Publishing responsible procurement commitments
- From ad hoc to institutionalized procurement
- Centralized vs. decentralized procurement models
- Building a center of excellence for AI sourcing
- Training procurement teams on AI fundamentals
- Integrating AI sourcing into ERP and P2P systems
- Automating vendor intake and risk screening
- Measuring procurement effectiveness and efficiency
- Continuous improvement through feedback loops
- Case study: Global insurer standardizes AI intake
- Case study: Manufacturer rolls out AI sourcing playbook
- Managing global variations in practice
- Scaling without losing agility
- Tracking emerging AI capabilities and risks
- Preparing for generative AI and agentic systems
- Adapting to new trust and safety expectations
- Building optionality into vendor relationships
- Scenario planning for AI disruption
- Investing in internal AI literacy
- Collaborating with peer organizations
- Contributing to industry standards
- Case study: Consortium develops shared AI procurement framework
- Case study: Firm prepares for autonomous AI agents
- Reviewing and refreshing strategy quarterly
- Leading the evolution of responsible AI sourcing
How this maps to your situation
- You're leading AI adoption but facing delays in vendor approval
- You need to justify AI investments to executives or board members
- Your teams are using AI tools without centralized oversight
- You're building or refining an enterprise AI governance framework
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3-4 hours per module, designed for busy professionals to complete at their own pace over 8-12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or vendor-specific training, this program delivers implementation-grade frameworks tailored to the complexities of enterprise procurement, with actionable tools and real-world case studies from regulated industries.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.