A tailored course, built for your situation
Broader Scope for Data Engineering Leaders Using ISO 22301
Earn the mandate to lead continuity across data systems and infrastructure
The situation this course is for
Data engineering leaders are expected to deliver resilient systems, but most frameworks don’t integrate continuity planning into pipeline design. Without ISO 22301 fluency, teams default to reactive fixes, lose influence during incidents, and miss the chance to define recovery standards.
Who this is for
Senior data engineering managers shaping infrastructure at scale, leading teams that own pipeline reliability and cross-system data flow
Who this is not for
Individual contributors not leading teams, engineers focused only on query optimisation or dashboarding, non-technical compliance staff
What you walk away with
- Own the data continuity playbook others follow during incidents
- Define recovery SLAs for pipelines that feed critical business functions
- Shape ISO 22301 integration points across ingestion, transformation, and storage layers
- Lead cross-functional drills with infrastructure and security teams using standardised scenarios
- Document continuity decisions that scale beyond team turnover
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 22301 means for data teams
- Continuity vs. disaster recovery differences
- Key clauses in ISO 22301 relevant to data
- Mapping data systems to business impact
- Recovery time objectives for pipelines
- Recovery point objectives for streaming data
- Role of data engineers in BIA
- Incident classification for data outages
- Dependency mapping across microservices
- Defining critical data flows
- SLA tiers for pipeline uptime
- Baseline assessment for compliance
- Designing for continuity from day one
- Schema versioning and backward compatibility
- Redundant ingestion pathways
- Failover logic in stream processors
- Cross-region data replication policies
- Automated pipeline restart conditions
- Metadata continuity tracking
- Data checkpointing for recovery
- Storage layer resilience design
- Backup strategies for transactional data
- Retention policies aligned with RTO
- Encryption during data transfer recovery
- Identifying high-impact data pipelines
- Interviewing product teams on uptime needs
- Classifying pipelines by business function
- Quantifying downtime cost for reporting
- Uptime requirements from legal teams
- SLA input from customer-facing teams
- Mapping dependencies on upstream sources
- Downstream consumer impact scoring
- Weighting pipelines by revenue impact
- Documenting recovery priority tiers
- Validating with incident response leads
- Updating assessments quarterly
- Defining recovery triggers for pipelines
- Automated alerting for data gaps
- Manual intervention points in recovery
- Pipeline state rollback strategies
- Data reconciliation after failover
- Validating data integrity post-recovery
- Reprocessing backlogged events
- Handling schema drift during recovery
- Recovery runbook ownership model
- Testing data recovery scenarios
- Documenting known recovery limits
- Versioning recovery playbooks
- Ownership model for recovery plans
- Quarterly review cadence for pipelines
- Change control for pipeline modifications
- Audit trails for configuration updates
- Sign-off process for RTO adjustments
- Version control for recovery playbooks
- Internal audit coordination
- Preparing for ISO 22301 auditor review
- Documenting compliance evidence
- Handling auditor follow-up questions
- Updating controls after incidents
- Maintaining continuity policy currency
- Designing test scenarios for data
- Simulating partial data loss
- Inducing pipeline backpressure
- Testing cross-region failover
- Recovery time measurement methods
- Validating data consistency post-test
- Coordinating with security teams
- Logging test observations
- Identifying hidden dependencies
- Improving test fidelity over time
- Reporting test results to leadership
- Scheduling recurring drills
- Engaging with incident response teams
- Aligning data RTO with app recovery
- Negotiating recovery order with product
- Training first responders on data flows
- Providing data inputs for crisis comms
- Participating in enterprise-wide drills
- Translating pipeline status for execs
- Escalation paths during incidents
- Joint ownership of recovery metrics
- Building trust with security leads
- Influencing platform-level decisions
- Expanding data team’s strategic role
- Writing the data continuity SoA
- Compiling evidence for each control
- Linking controls to pipeline design
- Creating auditor-friendly summaries
- Using diagrams to show recovery flow
- Versioning documentation sets
- Storing artefacts for audit access
- Preparing for sample requests
- Anticipating auditor questions
- Responding to findings professionally
- Updating documents post-audit
- Archiving retired versions
- Creating reusable recovery templates
- Standardising RTO definitions
- Onboarding new teams to continuity
- Workshops for data continuity basics
- Mentoring junior engineers
- Sharing incident learnings
- Building internal continuity champions
- Curating a knowledge base
- Promoting consistency across squads
- Reducing variability in recovery
- Scaling through automation
- Measuring adoption across teams
- Conducting effective post-mortems
- Capturing recovery time data
- Identifying bottlenecks in failover
- Updating playbooks after incidents
- Prioritising technical debt items
- Tracking improvement over time
- Benchmarking against peer teams
- Investing in automation upgrades
- Balancing durability and cost
- Revising RTOs with product input
- Closing feedback loops
- Celebrating resilience wins
- Framing continuity as business enabler
- Telling stories from incident response
- Quantifying risk reduction
- Linking pipeline stability to revenue
- Presenting to tech leadership
- Creating executive dashboards
- Highlighting team contributions
- Avoiding fear-based messaging
- Showing maturity progression
- Aligning with company resilience goals
- Advocating for investment
- Positioning for broader influence
- Onboarding new engineers to continuity
- Updating plans with system changes
- Preserving tribal knowledge
- Documenting rationale for decisions
- Succession planning for ownership
- Maintaining stakeholder engagement
- Evolving with new data platforms
- Integrating with DevOps pipelines
- Adapting to new regulatory needs
- Measuring continuity maturity
- Sharing best practices externally
- Leading the next wave of improvement
How this maps to your situation
- After a near-miss data outage
- During platform-level ISO 22301 adoption
- Before an external audit cycle
- When expanding team influence
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside regular work over 6, 8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses specifically on data engineering systems and ISO 22301 integration , giving you role-specific capabilities that translate directly to expanded mandate.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.