A tailored course, built for your situation
More Defensible Basel III Outputs on the First Attempt
Produce audit-ready capital reports with fewer review cycles and stronger methodology alignment
The situation this course is for
High-stakes regulatory reports keep circling back for revisions because they lack the depth of justification needed the first time around. This delays sign-off, strains team capacity, and weakens credibility with internal reviewers.
Who this is for
Senior compliance or risk executive operating under Basel III frameworks, responsible for timely, accurate, and defensible capital reporting.
Who this is not for
Junior analysts still learning the structure of Basel III, or practitioners outside financial services regulation.
What you walk away with
- Produce capital adequacy reports with stronger methodological justification from the first draft
- Reduce revision loops on Pillar 2a submissions by aligning documentation to EBA reporting templates
- Embed EAD and LGD assumptions more transparently in internal A-IRB validations
- Accelerate internal review timelines by pre-answering common challenge points
- Build reusable templates for leverage ratio disclosures that meet BCBS 117 expectations
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What examiners look for in Pillar 1 reports
- Structure of a clean CET1 ratio calculation
- Mapping disclosures to COREP templates
- Common gaps in risk-weighted asset summaries
- How EBA Q&A updates affect output design
- Benchmarking against peer submissions
- Internal sign-off triggers vs regulatory requirements
- Version control in capital calculations
- Linking parameter choices to policy text
- Using footnotes to preempt challenges
- Where BCBS 117 creates disclosure pressure
- First-time-right checklist for quarterly filings
- Standardised approach pitfalls for CRE exposures
- Treatment of securitisation exposures under CRR2
- Granularity adjustments for sovereign portfolios
- Treatment of unfunded commitments
- Application of large exposures framework
- HQLA classification under LCR rules
- Time-bound vs permanent mismatch
- Treatment of gold repo transactions
- FX risk in RWA allocation
- Derivatives marking-to-market alignment
- Collateral haircut consistency
- Backtesting RWA against actual defaults
- Definition of exposure measure under Article 429
- Treatment of repo-style transactions
- Intra-group offset rules
- Treatment of cleared derivatives
- Capital deductions alignment
- Consolidation perimeter checks
- Disclosure granularity by counterparty
- Reconciliation with GAAP totals
- Treatment of gold leases
- Threshold testing for materiality
- Cross-border reporting alignment
- Template CR-LR01 population guide
- PD model benchmarking standards
- LGD calibration against realised outcomes
- EAD model backtesting protocol
- Treatment of default definition triggers
- Portfolio segmentation rationale
- Holding period assumptions
- Default recognition lag
- Migration matrix validation
- Stress input sourcing
- Long-run average loss derivation
- Model change control logs
- Internal model audit trail design
- ICAAP narrative structure
- Risk identification taxonomy
- Scenario design for stress testing
- Capital planning integration
- Risk appetite statement alignment
- Internal capital target setting
- Treatment of concentration risk
- Operational risk severity assumptions
- Liquidity risk feedback loops
- Governance escalation triggers
- Internal review committee prep
- Documentation of management actions
- Predicting EBA follow-up questions
- Embedding rationale in footnotes
- Cross-referencing policy sections
- Using appendices without weakening main text
- Standardising exception explanations
- Version comparison summaries
- Change impact matrices
- Rationale for parameter freezes
- Handling model drift notices
- Documenting waiver applications
- Responding to supervisory remarks
- Creating reviewer decision aids
- C 01.00 structure and logic
- C 02.00 risk concentration details
- C 07.00 leverage ratio data
- C 13.00 own funds breakdown
- C 23.00 risk mitigation
- C 30.00 collateral eligibility
- C 43.00 counterparty risk
- C 51.00 asset encumbrance
- C 61.00 leverage ratio
- C 71.00 interest rate risk
- C 81.00 profit and loss
- C 91.00 summary of exposures
- Defining baseline scenarios
- Selecting adverse triggers
- Linking macro variables to portfolio loss
- Assumption transparency
- Time horizon consistency
- Counterfactual plausibility
- Interdependencies in risk factors
- Sensitivity testing structure
- Reverse stress testing logic
- Capital depletion thresholds
- Recovery planning integration
- Narrative flow for non-experts
- Common internal feedback patterns
- Audit trail completeness
- Footnote sufficiency standards
- Parameter justification depth
- Model documentation integration
- Assumption disclosure templates
- Version reconciliation summaries
- Change impact explanations
- Stakeholder-specific summaries
- Pre-submission checklist design
- Review cycle benchmarking
- First-time acceptance tracking
- Scope definition for model validation
- Backtesting methodology
- Benchmarking against alternatives
- Expert judgement documentation
- Model change impact assessment
- Stability testing protocol
- Sensitivity analysis design
- Default definition consistency
- Portfolio homogeneity checks
- Calibration interval rationale
- Floor application tracking
- Challenge memo integration
- Assumption logging standards
- Parameter sourcing documentation
- Model selection rationale
- Policy exceptions tracking
- Historical calibration references
- Expert judgement traceability
- Data quality caveats
- Model limitations disclosure
- External benchmark alignment
- Internal consistency checks
- Cross-module validation
- Reproducibility standards
- Template version control
- Automated data pulls setup
- Standard footnote libraries
- Assumption registry design
- Model validation tracking
- Disclosure calendar integration
- Review cycle metrics tracking
- Stakeholder feedback loops
- Update triggers based on regulation
- Knowledge transfer protocols
- Succession-proofing documentation
- Team quality benchmarking
How this maps to your situation
- When drafting quarterly Basel III reports
- During internal model validation cycles
- Preparing for EBA review waves
- Responding to internal audit findings
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 60 minutes per week over 12 weeks, with self-paced access.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic Basel III overviews, this course delivers precise, actionable templates and decision logic tailored to senior practitioners who must produce defensible outputs consistently.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.