A tailored course, built for your situation
Sources and specific examples on hand when peers push back
Build unshakable technical reasoning for DevOps decisions , rooted in real-world implementations and public-sector precedents
The situation this course is for
Who this is for
Senior DevOps Engineer in government-contractor environments who must justify design choices to peers, auditors, and multi-vendor teams
Who this is not for
Entry-level engineers learning core tooling, or leaders focused only on cost or resource allocation without technical depth
What you walk away with
- Trace every pipeline decision back to a documented security or compliance requirement
- Reference real NIST-aligned implementations when debating toolchain choices
- Walk through the why of IaC templates using public DISA STIG examples
- Defend CI/CD guardrail placements with cited incidents from federal cloud audits
- Cite cross-contractor patterns when challenged on environment segregation
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What NIST says about cloud boundaries
- How it applies to DoD container use
- Recent audit findings from CMMC reviews
- Where AWS GovCloud fits in the model
- Common misalignments in access controls
- Linking RBAC to NIST role definitions
- When serverless breaks the model
- Documenting exceptions with citations
- Cross-walk with DISA’s cloud guidance
- Using the model in design reviews
- Template: Cloud boundary justification
- Template: Role mapping evidence pack
- GSA’s 18F pipeline design principles
- How approvals were structured in CMS migration
- CISA’s open-source CI/CD playbook
- Applying lessons to your deployment gates
- When to require peer review
- Justifying automated rollbacks
- Logging levels for auditability
- Security scanning integration points
- Environment promotion logic
- Handling emergency bypasses
- Template: Pipeline justification memo
- Template: Gate rationale document
- Naming conventions from DISA STIGs
- How to reference security baselines
- VPC design from public AWS blueprints
- Subnet segmentation in DoD projects
- DNS and routing standards
- Tagging requirements for CMDB
- Using open TF modules from state projects
- Custom module justification
- Variables vs. hardcoded values
- Version pinning policy
- Template: IaC decision log
- Template: Module sourcing checklist
- Secrets storage in CISA’s incident reports
- Vault vs. KMS: when each is preferred
- Access review frequency benchmarks
- Break-glass procedures from audits
- How 18F structures role access
- Short-lived token implementations
- Integration with IAM providers
- Auditing secret access at scale
- Disaster recovery considerations
- Justifying rotation intervals
- Template: Secrets access review log
- Template: Break-glass justification
- What CMMC expects in logs
- How long to retain artifacts
- Which fields are non-negotiable
- Correlating logs across services
- Using structured JSON consistently
- Sampling strategies for cost
- Alerting thresholds from real outages
- Third-party tool integration
- Avoiding over-collection
- Documenting log lineage
- Template: Log schema standard
- Template: Retention policy justification
- NSA’s zero-trust guidance for DevOps
- Zone definitions from recent audits
- East-west traffic controls
- Justifying firewall placement
- DNS filtering in zero-trust
- Service mesh adoption patterns
- Identity-based routing
- How DoD classifies trust zones
- Documenting zone transitions
- Template: Zone boundary rationale
- Template: Service mesh justification
- Template: Access flow diagram
- NIST 800-53 control AU-3
- Automating audit trail coverage
- DISA’s SCAP benchmarks
- How to implement AC-6 in pipelines
- CIS Benchmark mappings
- Using OpenSCAP in CI
- Documenting control exceptions
- Patch window compliance
- Time sync and logging
- Validation with public test suites
- Template: Control-to-code mapping
- Template: Exception justification
- Recent CISA outage reports
- Recovery time benchmarks
- Failover testing frequency
- Documenting test results
- Involving audit teams in drills
- Data consistency checks
- Backup integrity validation
- Testing multi-region failover
- Justifying test scope
- Template: DR test justification memo
- Template: Recovery checklist
- Template: Post-test review
- Tool choices in GSA projects
- Security considerations per tool
- Scaling costs in large teams
- Auditability features
- Integration with IdP
- Custom plugin risks
- Open-source vs. managed
- Disaster recovery support
- CISA tool advisories
- Documenting selection criteria
- Template: Tool selection scorecard
- Template: Justification memo
- CMMC change control requirements
- How 18F structures approvals
- Automated vs. manual gates
- Emergency change tracking
- Documenting rollback plans
- Peer review expectations
- Using pull requests as audit trail
- Integrating Jira with CI/CD
- Justifying fast-tracked changes
- Template: Change control policy
- Template: Fast-track log
- Template: Review checklist
- CISA’s known exploited vulnerabilities
- CVSS scoring in context
- When to block based on score
- Time-to-fix expectations
- False positive management
- Scanning layers: SAST, DAST, SCA
- Using dependency checks
- Container scanning depth
- Justifying risk acceptance
- Template: Vulnerability policy
- Template: Risk acceptance form
- Template: Scan configuration
- Inter-contractor API standards
- Shared logging schemas
- Common IaC modules
- Version alignment strategies
- Dispute resolution patterns
- Documenting interface contracts
- Using open APIs from GSA
- Aligning security tooling
- Justifying common CI platforms
- Template: Interface agreement
- Template: Collaboration playbook
- Template: Dispute log
How this maps to your situation
- When a peer questions your pipeline design
- Before an internal audit review
- During a multi-contractor architecture meeting
- When scoping a new environment build
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, with on-demand access for reference integration.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic DevOps courses, this program delivers citation-backed, public-sector-specific reasoning for real architecture debates , not just theory or tooling syntax.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.