A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering DORA for QA Automation Engineers in Regulated Financial Environments
Build auditable, defensible test automation frameworks that stand up to regulator scrutiny and internal audit pushback
The situation this course is for
Teams treat DORA as a checklist, not a defensible framework. When auditors ask 'Why this test?', most can't cite EBA guidance or show precedent. That gap leads to failed validations, rework, and loss of influence.
Who this is for
Senior QA Automation Engineer in a regulated financial institution, responsible for validating operational resilience controls under DORA, FFIEC, or similar regimes
Who this is not for
Junior testers who don’t own test design, compliance generalists without automation experience, or teams treating DORA as a one-time project
What you walk away with
- Map every automated test case directly to EBA’s DORA RTS Article 16-20 requirements with cited sources
- Document the rationale for each test design decision using regulator-endorsed examples
- Respond to peer or auditor challenges with specific, precedent-backed reasoning
- Build reusable test validation packages that survive personnel and leadership changes
- Own the narrative on test automation validity during internal and external audits
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What DORA means for QA engineers
- Key deadlines for U.S. institutions
- EBA vs FFIEC expectations
- How DORA affects test automation scope
- Common misconceptions in banking IT
- Regulatory testing vs internal QA
- The role of documentation depth
- How regulators evaluate test design
- Precedent from the current cycle dry runs
- DORA’s impact on third-party vendors
- Mapping DORA to QA workflows
- First steps in validation readiness
- Identifying Article 16 controls
- Breaking down resilience testing
- Automating incident response checks
- Testing third-party dependencies
- Sourcing control requirements
- Building testable interpretations
- Using EBA guidance as input
- Mapping test outputs to evidence
- Traceability matrix design
- Versioning test logic
- Common mapping errors
- Validating mapping accuracy
- Why test design matters
- Using precedent from EBA examples
- Building scenario catalogs
- Automating plausible incidents
- Documenting decision logic
- Including regulator reasoning
- Versioning test scenarios
- Peer-reviewing test validity
- Responding to pushback
- Updating scenarios annually
- Handling edge cases
- Linking scenarios to business impact
- Locating DORA RTS documents
- Interpreting Article 17 correctly
- Extracting testable requirements
- Citing EBA language precisely
- Building a source library
- Versioning regulatory text
- Cross-referencing with FFIEC
- Handling ambiguous language
- Documenting interpretation logic
- Sharing sources across teams
- Updating for amendments
- Archiving for audits
- Why rationale matters
- Structuring documentation
- Linking test to regulation
- Including risk context
- Writing for auditors
- Using plain language
- Versioning rationale
- Peer validation
- Automating rationale checks
- Updating for changes
- Storing for retrieval
- Sharing across QA
- DORA’s vendor clauses
- Mapping to vendor contracts
- Automating compliance checks
- Testing vendor incident plans
- Validating response times
- Auditing subcontractor logs
- Building vendor scorecards
- Integrating with procurement
- Handling non-compliance
- Updating test packs annually
- Using EBA benchmarks
- Documenting vendor validation
- Defining incident scope
- Automating detection triggers
- Simulating escalation paths
- Validating communication trees
- Timing response phases
- Testing cross-team coordination
- Logging simulation results
- Benchmarking against EBA
- Updating playbooks post-test
- Versioning scenarios
- Integrating with SOAR
- Reporting to risk teams
- What makes a test reusable
- Standardizing templates
- Including sourcing data
- Versioning frameworks
- Automating documentation
- Storing in shared repos
- Tagging by control type
- Training new hires
- Updating for new versions
- Contributing back
- Cross-project sharing
- Maintaining ownership
- Why peer review matters
- Structuring review meetings
- Sharing test rationale
- Sourcing pushback examples
- Updating designs post-review
- Building rebuttal libraries
- Preparing auditors
- Running dry audits
- Documenting feedback
- Versioning responses
- Training reviewers
- Establishing governance
- What auditors look for
- Structuring evidence packs
- Including test logs
- Adding rationale documents
- Versioning submissions
- Automating pack generation
- Preparing cross-team inputs
- Reviewing for completeness
- Submitting on time
- Tracking auditor feedback
- Updating for findings
- Archiving final packs
- Tracking regulatory updates
- Updating test logic
- Versioning test cases
- Reviewing annually
- Automating change detection
- Alerting on drift
- Revalidating vendor tests
- Updating evidence packs
- Revising rationale docs
- Training new QA staff
- Auditing legacy tests
- Sunsetting obsolete cases
- Identifying other use cases
- Sharing templates
- Training peer teams
- Standardizing documentation
- Building internal playbooks
- Gaining leadership buy-in
- Measuring adoption
- Tracking quality gains
- Reducing rework time
- Expanding to PCI DSS
- Integrating with SOC 2
- Establishing a center of excellence
How this maps to your situation
- Preparing for first DORA audit
- Defending test design under peer review
- Responding to auditor follow-ups
- Scaling compliance across departments
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed for integration into current compliance cycles.
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic DORA courses teach compliance checklists. This course teaches how to defend each automated test with sourced, specific examples from EBA guidance and peer-tested frameworks.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.