Skip to main content

Error Management in Problem Management

$199.00
When you get access:
Course access is prepared after purchase and delivered via email
Who trusts this:
Trusted by professionals in 160+ countries
Your guarantee:
30-day money-back guarantee — no questions asked
How you learn:
Self-paced • Lifetime updates
Toolkit Included:
Includes a practical, ready-to-use toolkit containing implementation templates, worksheets, checklists, and decision-support materials used to accelerate real-world application and reduce setup time.
Adding to cart… The item has been added

This curriculum spans the design and operation of error management practices found in multi-workshop process improvement programs, covering the full lifecycle from error detection and classification to cross-functional resolution and performance tracking, as typically coordinated across incident, problem, change, and operations teams in mature IT service environments.

Module 1: Defining Error Control Boundaries in Problem Management

  • Determine which incident categories automatically trigger formal error identification based on recurrence thresholds and business impact criteria.
  • Establish criteria for distinguishing between known errors and temporary workarounds in the knowledge base to prevent misclassification.
  • Define ownership handoffs between incident resolution teams and problem management when an underlying error is suspected.
  • Integrate error logging standards with existing ITIL change enablement processes to ensure traceability during change implementation.
  • Configure CMDB relationships to explicitly link error records to affected configuration items and services.
  • Decide whether to maintain a separate error register or embed error data within problem records based on audit requirements.

Module 2: Error Identification Through Incident Pattern Analysis

  • Configure event correlation rules in monitoring tools to detect recurring incident patterns indicative of an underlying error.
  • Select statistical thresholds (e.g., incident volume spikes, mean time to resolve deviations) that trigger automated error review.
  • Implement root cause clustering using natural language processing on incident descriptions to group similar failure modes.
  • Assign responsibility for weekly incident trend reviews to designated problem managers based on service ownership.
  • Integrate log analytics platforms with service management tools to correlate application-level errors with service disruptions.
  • Document false positive patterns in automated detection to refine alerting logic and reduce noise.

Module 3: Managing the Known Error Database (KEDB)

  • Define mandatory fields for KEDB entries, including workaround validity dates and last verification timestamps.
  • Implement automated validation checks to ensure workarounds in the KEDB are linked to active incidents or changes.
  • Establish review cycles for stale known errors, requiring revalidation or archival after defined inactivity periods.
  • Enforce access controls so only authorized problem managers can publish or modify KEDB entries.
  • Integrate KEDB with self-service portals so service desk agents can retrieve approved workarounds during incident handling.
  • Conduct quarterly audits to verify alignment between KEDB content and actual production incidents.

Module 4: Coordinating Error Resolution Across Change and Release

  • Require problem records to include at least one proposed permanent fix before allowing transition to change control.
  • Classify error-related changes as standard, normal, or emergency based on risk and business impact criteria.
  • Assign change advisory board (CAB) reviewers with technical expertise relevant to the affected system or service.
  • Track change success rates for error resolutions to identify recurring implementation failures.
  • Enforce post-implementation reviews for high-impact error fixes to validate resolution effectiveness and side effects.
  • Link rollback procedures in change records to known error workarounds for rapid fallback during failed deployments.

Module 5: Error Escalation and Cross-Functional Governance

  • Define escalation paths for unresolved errors based on business service criticality and duration thresholds.
  • Establish service-level agreements (SLAs) for error resolution that align with business continuity requirements.
  • Convene cross-functional war rooms for persistent errors affecting multiple services or teams.
  • Document governance decisions when deferring error resolution due to technical debt or resource constraints.
  • Report unresolved error backlog to IT steering committees with risk exposure assessments.
  • Implement error board meetings with representatives from operations, development, and architecture to prioritize fixes.

Module 6: Integrating Proactive Error Detection in Operations

  • Deploy synthetic transaction monitoring to detect error conditions before user-reported incidents occur.
  • Incorporate error signature detection into AIOps platforms using historical incident and log data.
  • Configure automated alerts when workaround usage exceeds predefined thresholds, indicating unresolved root causes.
  • Embed error detection checks in pre-deployment validation pipelines to prevent known error reintroduction.
  • Use performance baseline deviations as triggers for proactive problem investigation and error logging.
  • Train operations teams to document suspected errors during major incident post-mortems for follow-up tracking.

Module 7: Measuring and Reporting Error Management Effectiveness

  • Track mean time to identify (MTTI) for errors from first incident occurrence to formal logging.
  • Calculate percentage of incidents resolved using documented workarounds from the KEDB.
  • Measure reduction in incident volume for services after permanent fixes for known errors are deployed.
  • Report on error recurrence rates after change implementation to assess fix quality.
  • Monitor aging of open problem records with associated known errors to identify resolution bottlenecks.
  • Compare cost of workaround maintenance versus investment in permanent fixes for business case development.