A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for Product Strategy Leaders in High-Efficiency Tech Environments
Build unshakable business continuity plans that keep product innovation on track during disruption
The situation this course is for
Product leaders are expected to maintain roadmap velocity during outages, vendor failures, and compliance incidents, but lack structured frameworks to make rapid, defensible continuity decisions. Many rely on tribal knowledge or escalate needlessly, slowing innovation.
Who this is for
Senior product strategy professionals in large tech firms operating under efficiency mandates, where speed and resilience are non-negotiable
Who this is not for
Entry-level PMs, solo founders, or consultants without direct ownership of product continuity decisions
What you walk away with
- Make final decisions on product roadmap adjustments during declared incidents
- Approve continuity test outcomes without escalation to senior leadership
- Define the scope of vendor disaster recovery compliance for product-facing systems
- Lead cross-functional continuity rehearsals with engineering and infrastructure teams
- Publish auditable business impact analyses that close review loops in one pass
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining business continuity for product initiatives
- Mapping ISO 22301 clauses to product development timelines
- Identifying critical product functions under continuity scope
- Differentiating between operational and strategic disruption
- Establishing ownership boundaries between product and infrastructure teams
- Linking continuity planning to feature release cycles
- Using ISO 22301 to prioritize technical debt reduction
- Incorporating vendor SLAs into continuity planning
- Measuring product continuity maturity
- Aligning with legal and compliance on incident reporting thresholds
- Documenting decision rights during declared incidents
- Building executive communication protocols for product delays
- Securing mandate for product continuity planning
- Scoping product functions subject to continuity requirements
- Identifying internal stakeholders in engineering and infrastructure
- Establishing timeline for initial BCM deployment
- Creating cross-functional working groups
- Defining success metrics for first 90 days
- Documenting assumptions and constraints
- Building initial inventory of product-critical systems
- Assigning roles in continuity governance
- Setting expectations with program and portfolio managers
- Integrating with existing product risk frameworks
- Publishing first version of product continuity charter
- Defining recovery time objectives for product features
- Assessing customer impact of feature unavailability
- Gathering input from product, UX, and support teams
- Mapping dependencies across microservices and APIs
- Estimating revenue impact of roadmap delays
- Prioritizing features using RTO and RPO criteria
- Classifying data sensitivity in product workflows
- Documenting assumptions behind BIA ratings
- Validating BIA findings with engineering leads
- Linking BIA outcomes to sprint planning buffers
- Updating BIA after major product changes
- Auditing BIA for consistency across quarters
- Cataloging threats to product delivery timelines
- Evaluating vendor stability for core APIs
- Assessing risk of developer access disruptions
- Reviewing impact of authentication system failures
- Analyzing dependency on external data sources
- Measuring likelihood of regional infrastructure collapse
- Assessing risk of CI/CD pipeline disruption
- Evaluating threat of key personnel unavailability
- Rating risk severity using ISO 22301 criteria
- Prioritizing risks for mitigation planning
- Linking risk register to incident response roles
- Updating risk assessment after post-mortems
- Defining minimum viable product paths during outages
- Planning for feature de-scoping under disruption
- Establishing fallback user workflows
- Designing communication plans for delayed releases
- Creating modular roadmap structures for resilience
- Identifying interchangeable vendor components
- Building redundancy into API integrations
- Planning for multi-region deployment fallbacks
- Using dark launches to maintain continuity
- Prioritizing technical investments that reduce RTO
- Documenting strategic trade-offs during incidents
- Aligning continuity plans with quarterly planning
- Defining incident severity levels for product impact
- Setting thresholds for declaring product incidents
- Assigning response roles within product teams
- Establishing communication channels during outages
- Creating initial incident response checklist
- Integrating with central incident command structure
- Building decision trees for feature rollback or delay
- Documenting escalation paths for unresolved issues
- Designing post-incident review process
- Tracking resolution timelines for audit purposes
- Testing response plan assumptions quarterly
- Updating response playbooks after incidents
- Scheduling continuity exercises with engineering teams
- Designing scenario-based product disruption drills
- Involving UX and customer support in simulations
- Measuring response effectiveness with KPIs
- Identifying gaps in vendor coordination
- Validating communication protocols with stakeholders
- Documenting findings from continuity exercises
- Tracking remediation of exercise findings
- Reporting exercise outcomes to leadership
- Using exercise insights to refine roadmap buffers
- Automating validation checks for continuity controls
- Aligning exercise frequency with product release pace
- Organizing documentation for ISO 22301 compliance
- Versioning business impact analyses and risk registers
- Linking controls to specific ISO 22301 clauses
- Creating audit-ready continuity policy statements
- Documenting decision rights and escalation paths
- Maintaining records of continuity exercises
- Storing incident response reports securely
- Tracking changes to vendor SLAs and contracts
- Updating documentation after product changes
- Preparing evidence packs for internal audit
- Using templates to standardize documentation
- Reducing documentation drift across teams
- Mapping product plans to enterprise BCM scope
- Participating in cross-functional BCM governance
- Sharing product-specific risks with central team
- Receiving updates from infrastructure continuity leads
- Contributing to enterprise-wide exercise planning
- Reporting product continuity KPIs centrally
- Aligning product RTOs with company-wide targets
- Coordinating communication during enterprise incidents
- Negotiating exceptions for high-velocity teams
- Incorporating enterprise feedback into product plans
- Using shared BCM tools for consistency
- Reporting upward on product resilience maturity
- Communicating the value of continuity planning
- Recognizing teams that prepare proactively
- Sharing lessons from past incidents transparently
- Incentivizing resilience in performance goals
- Reducing stigma around declaring incidents
- Promoting psychological safety in response roles
- Educating new hires on continuity expectations
- Measuring adoption of continuity behaviors
- Celebrating successful continuity outcomes
- Linking resilience to product quality perception
- Role-modeling calm decision-making under stress
- Sustaining engagement between exercises
- Streamlining documentation for agile teams
- Automating evidence collection for audits
- Using sprint retrospectives to improve continuity
- Embedding RTO checks in release gates
- Reducing review cycles for continuity updates
- Leveraging feature flags for faster recovery
- Integrating continuity checks into CI/CD pipelines
- Using metrics to justify reduced testing overhead
- Balancing innovation speed with resilience
- Prioritizing high-impact controls only
- Adapting exercise scope to sprint cadence
- Maintaining ISO 22301 compliance at scale
- Scheduling regular review cycles for continuity plans
- Updating BIA after major product changes
- Revising risk register quarterly
- Refreshing incident response roles annually
- Tracking changes in vendor dependencies
- Incorporating lessons from post-mortems
- Benchmarking against industry resilience standards
- Using audit findings to drive improvements
- Reporting maturity gains to leadership
- Investing in automation for evidence collection
- Expanding scope to new product lines
- Handing off continuity ownership during leadership changes
How this maps to your situation
- Product continuity under efficiency pressures
- Autonomy in roadmap decisions during incidents
- Cross-functional alignment on disruption response
- Audit-ready documentation for fast-moving teams
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: 90 minutes of focused reading and implementation planning, structured over one weekend
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic ISO 22301 courses focus on operations or IT. This is tailored to product strategy leads who own roadmap continuity , with exact decision rights, evidence structures, and audit expectations for tech firms under efficiency pressure.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.