A tailored course, built for your situation
Direct ownership of ISO 42001 AI governance artefacts
Build, own, and iterate the AI management system framework with confidence
The situation this course is for
Contributing to AI governance efforts but not leading the framework design or final artefacts, limiting visibility and influence
Who this is for
Senior QA or compliance practitioner in a global services firm, working at the intersection of quality assurance and emerging governance frameworks
Who this is not for
Entry-level auditors, developers building AI models, or consultants focused solely on policy drafting without implementation
What you walk away with
- Own the ISO 42001 Statement of Applicability (SoA) with documented rationale for each control
- Lead internal audit preparation with pre-built evidence trails and control mappings
- Confidently respond to client or regulator follow-ups using structured, source-backed reasoning
- Deliver repeatable AI governance packages that compound across engagements
- Gain direct sign-off authority on framework adaptations for client-specific deployments
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 42001 solves that QA frameworks don't
- Mapping ISO 42001 to client audit expectations
- Key roles in AI management system deployment
- How QA leads fit into ISO 42001 ownership
- Difference between compliance and governance artefacts
- Client types adopting ISO 42001 first
- Common overlap with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001
- When ISO 42001 applies in M&A due diligence
- Regulator interest in AI governance frameworks
- How the firm positions ISO 42001 in proposals
- First-party vs third-party certification paths
- Timeline for internal framework deployment
- Identifying AI systems in complex client environments
- Documenting system boundaries for audit
- Exclusion justification with evidence
- Stakeholder input for scope validation
- Version control for scope documents
- Handling multi-jurisdictional AI deployments
- Mapping scope to service delivery contracts
- Scope alignment with SOC 2 boundaries
- When to escalate boundary conflicts
- Using QA logs to validate scope completeness
- Scope sign-off workflow with client leads
- Common scope creep triggers to avoid
- Defining organizational context for AI governance
- Identifying internal stakeholders for ISO 42001
- Documenting leadership responsibilities
- Integrating AI policy with quality policy
- Establishing governance committees
- Roles for QA leads in governance bodies
- Tracking leadership engagement
- Documenting strategic direction inputs
- Linking AI objectives to business outcomes
- Handling conflicting priorities across teams
- Escalation paths for governance gaps
- Reporting structure for AI management
- Identifying AI-specific risks in QA workflows
- Stakeholder risk input collection
- Risk register structure for ISO 42001
- Risk tolerance thresholds
- Linking risks to control objectives
- QA findings as risk inputs
- Risk treatment plan documentation
- Assigning risk owners
- Risk review frequency
- Integrating risk register with audit logs
- Common risk assessment pitfalls
- Risk reporting to leadership
- Overview of ISO 42001 Annex A controls
- Control applicability assessment
- Mapping controls to QA processes
- Documenting control rationale
- Using QA test results as control evidence
- Control ownership assignment
- Control implementation tracking
- Handling control overlaps with other frameworks
- Control review frequency
- Updating control mappings for new deployments
- Common control selection errors
- Control gap analysis methodology
- SoA structure and required fields
- Documenting control inclusion rationale
- Documenting control exclusion justification
- Linking SoA to risk register
- Version control for SoA updates
- QA review of SoA completeness
- Client-specific SoA customisation
- SoA review workflow
- Common SoA audit findings
- Integrating SoA with other compliance docs
- SoA update triggers
- SoA sign-off authority
- Internal audit scope definition
- Audit schedule planning
- Evidence collection framework
- Using QA reports as audit evidence
- Audit finding categorisation
- Corrective action tracking
- Audit report structure
- Audit follow-up process
- QA lead role in audit execution
- Audit readiness checklist
- Common internal audit gaps
- Audit improvement planning
- Management review agenda planning
- Input collection from QA teams
- Performance metric definition
- Reporting on control effectiveness
- Trend analysis from QA data
- Resource gap identification
- Improvement initiative tracking
- Review meeting documentation
- Action item follow-up
- Linking reviews to client feedback
- Review frequency decisions
- Escalation of unresolved items
- Feedback collection from QA cycles
- Incident review integration
- Lessons learned documentation
- Improvement initiative prioritisation
- Change request workflow
- Version control for framework updates
- Stakeholder communication of changes
- Training needs from improvement cycles
- Tracking improvement impact
- Linking improvements to client outcomes
- Common improvement bottlenecks
- Sustaining improvement momentum
- Client presentation of ISO 42001 status
- Response templates for client queries
- Evidence package assembly
- QA validation of client deliverables
- Handling client-specific requirements
- Documentation version control
- Confidentiality handling
- Client review workflow
- Common client questions
- Client escalation handling
- Client feedback integration
- Renewal cycle documentation
- Certification body selection
- Pre-certification gap assessment
- Evidence pack assembly
- QA validation of certification docs
- Internal dry-run audits
- Corrective action planning
- Certification audit timeline
- Auditor communication protocol
- Common certification findings
- Post-certification maintenance
- Surveillance audit prep
- Certification scope updates
- Framework reuse across clients
- Template library development
- Training new team members
- QA integration into onboarding
- Framework update distribution
- Lessons learned sharing
- Cross-functional collaboration
- Client-specific adaptation process
- Framework maturity assessment
- Scaling success metrics
- Resource planning for growth
- Long-term framework ownership
How this maps to your situation
- When starting an ISO 42001 engagement from scratch
- When supporting a client through certification
- When QA findings reveal gaps in AI governance
- When scaling the framework across multiple accounts
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per week over 12 weeks, with self-paced access to all materials.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses specifically on ISO 42001 implementation in QA-led services environments, with real-world templates and decision trails from client engagements.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.