A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering Basel III for Senior Financial Technology Leaders
Build unshakable reasoning to defend capital and liquidity decisions under scrutiny
The situation this course is for
High-stakes decisions on capital and liquidity frameworks are being debated without clear lineage to Basel III text, leading to rework and second-guessing from non-technical stakeholders
Who this is for
Senior technical leader in financial services responsible for implementing and defending regulatory-compliant systems under Basel III
Who this is not for
Junior developers, non-technical compliance analysts, or professionals outside financial services regulation
What you walk away with
- Walk through the original Basel III text with confidence when challenged
- Reference EBA guidelines and BCBS interpretations to justify implementation choices
- Explain the rationale behind standardized vs. internal model approaches in capital calculation
- Defend liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) logic with specific examples from regulatory precedents
- Translate supervisory expectations into clear technical requirements without over-engineering
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Overview of Basel III and its evolution from Basel I and II
- Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements and scope of application
- Pillar 2 supervisory review process and internal controls
- Pillar 3 market discipline and disclosure requirements
- How Macquarie and other G-SIBs interpret Pillar 2 guidance
- Key differences between standardized and internal model approaches
- BCBS publication 239 and its impact on model governance
- EBA guidelines on ICAAP and ILAAP submissions
- Mapping regulatory text to system ownership domains
- Understanding the role of national competent authorities
- Timeline of Basel III implementation across jurisdictions
- Common misinterpretations in first-generation implementations
- Definition of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital under Basel III
- Common equity tier 1 capital treatment and deductions
- Standardized approach for credit risk and risk weights
- Foundation and advanced IRB approaches for credit exposure
- Operational risk and the standardized measurement approach
- How software systems validate capital ratios in real time
- Treatment of securitizations and off-balance-sheet exposures
- Credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk capital charge
- Leverage ratio as a backstop to risk-weighted capital
- Impact of the output floor on internal models
- Systematic handling of large exposures framework
- Automated monitoring of concentration risk thresholds
- Definition of high-quality liquid assets under Basel III
- Stock vs. flow approaches to liquidity measurement
- Classification of cash inflows and outflows under stress
- Treatment of retail and wholesale deposits in LCR
- Intercompany transactions and their recognition
- Currency mismatch treatment in cross-border operations
- System logic for 30-day survival period modeling
- Monitoring LCR at intra-day and daily frequencies
- Common errors in behavioral assumptions
- EBA guidelines on liquidity stress testing
- How to validate LCR outputs against regulatory templates
- Linking LCR to funding strategy and contingency planning
- NSFR as a complement to short-term liquidity metrics
- Available stable funding categories and multipliers
- Required stable funding for assets and commitments
- Treatment of derivatives and collateral exchanges
- Impact of secured vs. unsecured funding on NSFR
- System tracking of funding tenor and renewal risk
- Behavioral assumptions for retail deposit stability
- Wholesale funding concentration and rollover risk
- NSFR implications for product pricing and structuring
- How technology teams map NSFR to balance sheet data
- Common gaps in early NSFR implementations
- Linking NSFR to long-term business planning
- Model risk management framework under SR 11-7
- Segregation of duties in model development and validation
- Documentation standards for internal models
- Backtesting requirements for VaR and expected shortfall
- Stress testing model validation and challenge process
- Role of independent model validation teams
- System logging and audit trail for model inputs
- Handling model drift and recalibration triggers
- Regulatory expectations for model transparency
- Common findings in supervisory model reviews
- Version control and change management for models
- Integrating model risk into SDLC pipelines
- Pillar 3 disclosure requirements and public reporting
- Core capital and leverage ratio disclosures
- Liquidity risk and funding profile transparency
- Risk exposure and credit valuation adjustment disclosures
- Standardized templates for EBA and BCBS reporting
- System integration between risk and finance data
- Data lineage and traceability in regulatory reports
- Automated reconciliation with source systems
- Handling restatements and regulatory corrections
- Common errors in public disclosures
- Designing for auditability and external review
- Versioning and retention of regulatory outputs
- Original Basel II operational risk approaches
- Introduction of the standardized measurement approach
- Business indicator and loss component calculation
- Internal loss data collection and segmentation
- External data scaling and adjustment methods
- Scenario analysis and expert judgment inputs
- System requirements for operational risk data
- Automated aggregation of loss events
- Treatment of cyber risk and fraud losses
- Impact of the SMA on capital planning
- Common pitfalls in operational risk modeling
- Linking operational risk to control effectiveness
- Simple leverage ratio as a backstop to risk models
- Exposure calculation and on-balance-sheet treatment
- Derivatives and securities financing transactions
- Off-balance-sheet items and conversion factors
- Hedge accounting and its impact on exposure
- Consolidation scope and intra-group offsets
- System logic for real-time leverage monitoring
- Impact of the output floor on capital planning
- BCBS guidance on floor implementation timeline
- Common errors in leverage ratio reporting
- How technology teams validate floor calculations
- Linking leverage ratio to strategic decision-making
- Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) overview
- Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP)
- Scenario design and reverse stress testing
- Profit and loss projection under stress
- Loss allowance modeling and ALLL frameworks
- Balance sheet projection and funding assumptions
- System integration across risk, finance, and operations
- Automated scenario execution and reporting
- Governance of stress testing assumptions
- Common findings in supervisory stress tests
- Version control for scenario packages
- Linking stress results to dividend and buyback decisions
- BCBS role in global standard setting
- EBA implementation in the EU and EBA guidelines
- Federal Reserve and OCC rules in the US
- APRA approach in Australia and Asia-Pacific
- HKMA and MAS frameworks in Asia
- System design for multi-jurisdictional reporting
- Local regulatory deviations and interpretations
- Consolidated vs. local reporting requirements
- Impact of equivalence decisions on capital treatment
- Common conflicts in cross-border capital allocation
- Technology strategies for regulatory harmonization
- Managing parallel runs during transition periods
- Data governance and lineage for regulatory systems
- Master data management for legal entities and products
- Real-time vs. batch processing trade-offs
- Microservices and API design for modularity
- Cloud deployment and regulatory data location
- Resilience and disaster recovery for reporting systems
- Role-based access and segregation of duties
- Audit logging and change tracking requirements
- Integration with core banking and risk platforms
- Testing frameworks for regulatory logic
- Version control for compliance rules
- DevOps pipelines for regulated environments
- Preparing for internal and external challenges
- Using BCBS and EBA publications as evidence
- Documenting design rationale with citations
- Responding to auditor findings with precision
- Handling disagreements with risk or finance teams
- Presenting technical choices to non-technical leaders
- Building a library of precedents and interpretations
- Maintaining reasoning over time and team changes
- Common defensibility gaps in technical implementations
- Using peer benchmarking to strengthen position
- Creating reusable justification templates
- Establishing a defensible culture in engineering
How this maps to your situation
- When capital ratio calculations are questioned by audit
- When liquidity model assumptions are challenged by risk team
- When regulatory changes require rapid system updates
- When peer institutions adopt different interpretations
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside current responsibilities over 6-8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses exclusively on Basel III technical implementation and defensibility, with direct references to regulatory text, supervisory guidance, and real-world engineering decisions , not abstract frameworks or checklists.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.