A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for Critical Infrastructure Project Engineers
A structured path to owning business continuity decisions in high-impact engineering projects.
The situation this course is for
Most ISO 22301 implementations are built by compliance teams with minimal engineering input, leading to rigid, unworkable plans. When incidents occur, engineers are forced to follow protocols that don’t match field realities, causing delays and compliance drift.
Who this is for
Project-focused engineers in consulting or municipal roles who lead pipeline, infrastructure, or asset-intensive programs and need to own continuity decisions without escalation.
Who this is not for
Junior coordinators, corporate compliance officers without field experience, or consultants focused solely on documentation.
What you walk away with
- Define recovery time objectives for pipeline systems without requiring senior review
- Approve continuity test schedules and evidence collection cycles independently
- Set tiered incident escalation thresholds tailored to field operations
- Own the sign-off on vendor continuity readiness for third-party service providers
- Document decision logic in audit-ready formats that satisfy municipal and federal requirements
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Continuity vs. safety: understanding the overlap
- Municipal liability frameworks in Alberta
- When ISO 22301 intersects with CSA Z662
- Defining incident severity in pipeline terms
- Mapping RTOs to field intervention capacity
- Regulator expectations for public infrastructure
- Common gaps in consultant-led implementations
- Integrating BC into project lifecycle gates
- Role of the project engineer in continuity ownership
- How municipal procurement ties to BC readiness
- Vendor BC requirements in engineering contracts
- Documenting continuity decisions for audit
- Identifying critical pipeline functions
- Estimating downtime cost per hour
- Public safety thresholds as BIA inputs
- Mapping dependencies on power and comms
- Defining maximum tolerable downtime
- Using GIS data in BIA mapping
- Stakeholder interviews for field teams
- Documenting assumptions for auditors
- Aligning BIA with municipal emergency plans
- Versioning BIA for project phases
- Linking BIA to vendor SLAs
- Presenting BIA findings to non-engineers
- RTO vs. repair crew availability
- Spool and valve inventory lead times
- Weather windows for field access
- Road closure impact on response
- Mutual aid agreements as RTO factors
- Regulatory reporting deadlines
- Setting RTOs for control systems
- RTOs for telemetry and monitoring
- Escalation paths when RTO is breached
- Documenting RTO rationale
- Review cycles for RTO updates
- RTOs in contract handover packages
- When to initiate a continuity review
- Defining incident declaration criteria
- Setting threshold for internal alerts
- Authorizing test participation
- Modifying framework after incidents
- Documenting decision trails
- Handling pushback from operations
- Updating framework post-audit
- Version control for continuity plans
- Integrating lessons from drills
- Reporting changes to municipal leads
- Maintaining independence from audit
- Pressure drop thresholds
- SCADA alarm validation steps
- Field crew proximity triggers
- Weather-based pre-activation
- Third-party pipeline interference
- Automated notification rules
- Human-in-the-loop checkpoints
- Escalation to emergency services
- Internal comms tree activation
- Documenting incident initiation
- False alarm review process
- Trigger tuning post-event
- BC requirements in RFPs
- Reviewing vendor test evidence
- Onboarding continuity documentation
- Audit rights for vendor plans
- Penalties for non-compliance
- Mutual exercise participation
- Remote monitoring dependencies
- Cloud service continuity
- Fallback procedures for comms
- Verifying backup power at sites
- Response time guarantees
- Termination clauses based on BC
- Choosing test scope and depth
- Field team availability windows
- Simulated vs. live failure modes
- Involving emergency services
- Documentation requirements
- Post-test review structure
- Fixing gaps without blame
- Publishing test outcomes
- Updating plans based on results
- Auditor access to test records
- Test frequency by risk tier
- Lessons for future projects
- Incident declaration authority
- When to notify municipal leadership
- External agency coordination triggers
- Legal counsel involvement points
- Environmental reporting thresholds
- Public communication approvals
- Media response workflow
- Internal escalation timelines
- Delegating during absence
- Joint decision frameworks
- Documenting authority changes
- Handover during leadership transitions
- Evidence collection checklist
- Linking controls to ISO clauses
- Version control for documents
- Storing test results digitally
- Field log integration
- Redacting sensitive data
- Preparing audit briefings
- Responding to finding requests
- Maintaining independence from auditor
- Evidence retention timelines
- Municipal access requirements
- Updating packages post-audit
- Calgary emergency management structure
- Cross-department coordination
- Provincial oversight expectations
- Public disclosure thresholds
- Council reporting requirements
- Integrating with city-wide BC plans
- Budgeting for continuity activities
- Workforce continuity considerations
- IT systems continuity
- Physical site resilience
- Third-party assurance needs
- Annual reporting cycle prep
- Change triggers for framework updates
- Incorporating post-incident learnings
- Technology refresh impacts
- Climate change adaptation
- Regulatory changes in Alberta
- New construction impacts
- Decommissioning phases
- Lessons from peer projects
- Feedback loops from field teams
- Documenting evolution history
- Version control for updates
- Change communication plan
- Onboarding new project engineers
- Knowledge transfer protocols
- Municipal handover checklists
- Documenting decision rationale
- Reference materials for auditors
- Mentoring junior staff
- Maintaining institutional memory
- Standardizing across projects
- Building internal reputation
- Proving continuity value
- Scaling ownership model
- Graduating to leadership roles
How this maps to your situation
- Project engineer leading pipeline continuity design
- Consultant managing municipal compliance deliverables
- Field team lead preparing for incident response
- Vendor oversight lead enforcing BC requirements
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 6-8 hours total, designed to be completed in short sessions aligned with project milestones.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic ISO 22301 training, this course is built for project engineers in consulting and municipal roles , with field-specific examples, decision frameworks, and audit-proof documentation strategies.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.