A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 27001 for Machine Learning Engineers
Build security into ML systems with command of the ISO 27001 framework
The situation this course is for
Machine learning engineers often inherit security and compliance as afterthoughts, forcing rework, delaying deployments, and creating friction with audit teams. The lack of early integration means control mapping feels like translation work, not engineering.
Who this is for
Senior ML engineers working in regulated or standards-conscious environments who need to embed compliance into system design without sacrificing velocity.
Who this is not for
Engineers focused solely on research prototypes, or those without responsibility for production system integrity or audit readiness.
What you walk away with
- Map ISO 27001 controls to ML data lifecycle stages with precision
- Anticipate auditor questions on access control, encryption, and change management
- Produce a Statement of Applicability that reflects actual system architecture
- Document risk treatment plans that pass internal review on first submission
- Lead cross-functional alignment between ML teams and compliance stakeholders
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 27001 protects in ML systems
- Why ML increases attack surface
- Control relevance to training data
- Framework structure overview
- Annex A vs. control objectives
- Mapping scope to model deployment
- Common misalignments in AI teams
- Audit frequency for ML environments
- Integrating controls early
- Documentation expectations
- Role of the ML engineer in compliance
- Case example: fraud detection system
- Identifying asset owners
- Classifying data types
- Mapping data flow paths
- Exclusions with justification
- Model versioning considerations
- API endpoints in scope
- Cloud provider responsibilities
- Training vs. inference separation
- Third-party dependencies
- Logging and monitoring inclusion
- User access boundaries
- Scope sign-off process
- Threat modelling for data poisoning
- Model inversion risks
- Access control failure modes
- Unauthorised inference detection
- Bias as a security concern
- Data leakage vectors
- Adversarial attack surface
- Overfitting and data memorization
- Shadow model risks
- Third-party model components
- Risk scoring methodology
- Linking risks to controls
- A.5.1 Policies for ML systems
- A.6.2 Remote ML work
- A.7.4 Data labelling security
- A.8.1 Asset inventory for models
- A.8.2 Data classification schemes
- A.8.3 Handling encrypted models
- A.9.1 Access control for model APIs
- A.9.2 Role definitions for ML teams
- A.9.4 Self-service access risks
- A.10.1 Model code encryption
- A.12.6 Logging model access
- A.13.2 Secure ML pipelines
- Justifying inapplicable controls
- Mapping controls to system features
- Documenting technical exemptions
- Versioning the SoA
- Reviewer expectations
- Linking to architecture diagrams
- Model retraining triggers
- Update frequency
- Automating SoA updates
- Cross-team review process
- Audit trail for changes
- SoA sign-off authority
- Role-based access for data scientists
- Just-in-time access patterns
- Model access tokens
- API key lifecycle
- Service account hardening
- Privileged access review
- Break-glass procedures
- Access revocation automation
- Multi-factor for model deployment
- Identity provider integration
- Access logging standards
- Audit-ready access reports
- Encrypting training data at rest
- Tokenization for PII
- Data anonymization techniques
- Retention for model inputs
- Secure data sharing
- Encryption key management
- Data provenance tracking
- Differential privacy integration
- Data deletion automation
- Cross-border data flows
- Vendor data handling
- Data breach detection
- Detecting model poisoning
- Response to bias spikes
- Model rollback procedures
- Inference API compromise
- Alerting on anomalous outputs
- Forensic data preservation
- Drift as security event
- Red teaming ML systems
- Post-incident review
- Reporting to compliance
- Regulator notification triggers
- Public disclosure thresholds
- Due diligence for model providers
- Licensing obligations
- Open-source model risks
- Cloud ML service compliance
- Contractual control commitments
- Subprocessor transparency
- Model provenance verification
- Penetration testing clauses
- Right to audit provisions
- Security assurance documentation
- Incident escalation paths
- Exit strategy documentation
- Preparing access logs
- User permission reports
- Change management records
- Model lineage documentation
- Risk treatment plan updates
- Penetration test results
- Security awareness for ML team
- Internal audit findings
- Control testing samples
- SoA cross-references
- Executive sign-off records
- Evidence retention policy
- Automated control checks
- Policy-as-code for ML
- Drift detection scripts
- Automated SoA updates
- Compliance dashboards
- Alerting on control failure
- Integration with ticketing
- Audit logging completeness
- Model registry controls
- Pipeline scanning
- Automated evidence collection
- Remediation workflows
- Reporting compliance to leadership
- Linking controls to business goals
- Compliance as competitive advantage
- Investor-facing disclosures
- Ethics and compliance alignment
- Board-level communication templates
- Strategic risk narratives
- Compliance roadmap planning
- Resource allocation cases
- Cross-functional influence
- Public case studies
- Continuous improvement cycle
How this maps to your situation
- ML system design under regulatory scrutiny
- Preparing for ISO 27001 audit in AI team
- Building secure ML pipelines from scratch
- Leading compliance integration in engineering
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 4 hours per module, with self-paced progress and immediate access to implementation tools.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic ISO 27001 courses, this training is specifically tailored to machine learning engineers, with examples from real ML systems, control mappings relevant to AI/ML risks, and templates that reflect actual engineering workflows , not generic IT.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.