A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 42001 for Senior AI Governance Practitioners
A step-by-step path to owning the AI governance artefacts that cascade across high-impact engagements
The situation this course is for
Without a clear, consistent framework, AI governance work becomes reactive, chasing requests, revising deliverables, and deferring to others on sign-off. That delays impact and dims visibility on what you've built.
Who this is for
Senior practitioner in governance, risk, or compliance leading AI policy, audit, or control implementation across complex engagements
Who this is not for
Entry-level analysts, tool-specific implementers, or teams focused solely on AI model development without governance scope
What you walk away with
- Own the full ISO 42001 Statement of Applicability with confidence and precision
- Produce regulator-facing documentation that withstands follow-up scrutiny
- Become the first point of contact for M&A due diligence requests involving AI systems
- Lead cross-functional escalations with pre-built templates and documented rationale
- Ship board-prep materials faster using repeatable, audit-ready artefacts
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 42001 covers and what it excludes
- Mapping organisational structure to AI governance scope
- Identifying AI system inventory sources
- Classifying AI systems by risk tier
- Setting boundaries for external vs internal AI use
- Documenting data lineage for training sets
- Defining system development lifecycle stages
- Linking AI use cases to business functions
- Establishing user roles and access levels
- Tracking third-party AI component dependencies
- Determining reporting lines for AI oversight
- Creating a living boundary document
- Defining roles for AI governance committee
- Assigning AI system owner responsibilities
- Setting escalation paths for ethical concerns
- Documenting leadership training completion
- Creating minutes for governance meetings
- Tracking policy exception approvals
- Maintaining oversight of vendor AI tools
- Reporting AI incidents to senior leaders
- Scheduling recurring compliance reviews
- Managing documentation access controls
- Integrating AI risk into ERM framework
- Building audit trail for leadership actions
- Forming dedicated AI governance team roles
- Budgeting for ongoing compliance activities
- Allocating time for cross-functional reviews
- Hiring or contracting specialist roles
- Training staff on AI ethics principles
- Creating onboarding checklists for new hires
- Establishing communication protocols
- Maintaining version control for policies
- Scheduling annual refresh cycles
- Tracking tooling and infrastructure costs
- Planning for future AI adoption waves
- Measuring team capacity against workload
- Identifying inherent AI risks by use case
- Creating risk likelihood and impact scales
- Conducting stakeholder risk interviews
- Documenting risk tolerance thresholds
- Mapping risks to ISO 42001 control objectives
- Prioritising high-impact risk scenarios
- Designing risk mitigation workflows
- Setting risk escalation criteria
- Integrating risk register with GRC tools
- Reviewing risk treatment effectiveness
- Updating risk profiles quarterly
- Reporting risk posture to leadership
- Creating AI system narrative templates
- Recording model development approach
- Describing training data provenance
- Documenting testing and validation results
- Capturing version control history
- Listing intended use and limitations
- Including human-in-the-loop designs
- Reporting performance metrics over time
- Tracking model drift detection methods
- Maintaining update and retraining logs
- Archiving decommissioned models
- Securing documentation access
- Defining human review thresholds
- Designing override procedures
- Setting escalation paths for anomalies
- Documenting oversight shift schedules
- Creating incident reporting forms
- Training reviewers on bias detection
- Logging intervention decisions
- Auditing oversight effectiveness
- Measuring time-to-intervention
- Benchmarking oversight cost per case
- Improving feedback loops
- Updating protocols after incidents
- Testing for model stability
- Validating input data integrity
- Designing fallback mechanisms
- Monitoring for unexpected outputs
- Assessing cybersecurity resilience
- Conducting penetration testing
- Tracking system uptime and latency
- Evaluating stress test results
- Measuring reproducibility of outputs
- Logging system errors and warnings
- Updating recovery procedures
- Reviewing third-party component security
- Conducting privacy impact assessments
- Mapping data flows for GDPR compliance
- Implementing data minimisation practices
- Ensuring lawful basis for processing
- Managing consent mechanisms
- Anonymising training data sets
- Securing personal data storage
- Tracking data retention timelines
- Responding to DSARs involving AI
- Auditing access to sensitive data
- Reporting data breaches
- Updating policies after regulatory changes
- Creating user-facing documentation
- Writing plain language summaries
- Developing model cards
- Publishing accuracy metrics
- Disclosing limitations to users
- Creating technical white papers
- Updating documentation after changes
- Providing access to explanations
- Designing user feedback channels
- Measuring user understanding
- Benchmarking transparency against peers
- Improving disclosure formats
- Identifying protected attributes
- Testing for disparate impact
- Documenting bias mitigation steps
- Engaging diverse stakeholder groups
- Auditing outcomes by demographic
- Setting fairness thresholds
- Creating redress mechanisms
- Training teams on unconscious bias
- Reviewing model assumptions
- Improving dataset representativeness
- Tracking fairness metrics over time
- Reporting fairness posture to leadership
- Evaluating job displacement risks
- Measuring carbon footprint of AI models
- Assessing energy consumption
- Reviewing societal benefit claims
- Consulting community stakeholders
- Reporting ESG metrics
- Setting sustainability targets
- Monitoring long-term impacts
- Updating impact assessments
- Aligning with UN SDGs
- Publishing impact reports
- Engaging ethics advisory boards
- Scheduling system audits
- Tracking KPIs over time
- Collecting user feedback
- Reviewing incident logs
- Updating risk registers
- Revising policies after changes
- Conducting penetration tests
- Benchmarking against peers
- Improving documentation quality
- Training new team members
- Refreshing training data
- Planning for sunset of legacy systems
How this maps to your situation
- Handling M&A due diligence requests involving AI systems
- Responding to regulator inquiries about AI governance
- Leading internal audit readiness cycles
- Supporting board-level risk disclosures
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3, 4 hours per module, designed to fit alongside active engagements.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics guides or tool-specific certifications, this course delivers actionable, standards-aligned frameworks that produce artefacts directly usable in audits, M&A, and executive reviews , tailored for consultants operating at enterprise scale.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.