A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering OWASP for Machine Learning Engineers in High-Trust Environments
Build secure, auditable AI systems with confidence using proven OWASP methodologies tailored to ML infrastructure
The situation this course is for
Security reviews slow down AI innovation when they come late. Engineers without a clear security framework spend cycles justifying design choices instead of improving models. The result? Missed timelines, repeated audits, and lost influence.
Who this is for
Senior machine learning engineers working in regulated or high-exposure environments who want to lead AI security discussions, not just respond to them.
Who this is not for
Junior developers looking for introductory AI courses or non-technical leaders seeking high-level overviews.
What you walk away with
- Produce model documentation that proactively addresses OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and ML systems
- Anticipate and counter common security review objections before they're raised
- Integrate threat modeling into model development cycles without slowing delivery
- Speak confidently about security controls in cross-functional meetings with security and compliance teams
- Establish your reputation as the internal authority on secure ML system design
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Understanding the evolving threat model for AI systems
- Key differences between traditional app security and ML security
- OWASP's role in modern AI assurance frameworks
- How Meta's scale amplifies small security missteps
- Mapping OWASP Top 10 for LLMs to real-world use cases
- Security expectations from cross-functional partners
- Common misconceptions about model robustness
- Why 'secure by default' fails without proactive design
- Integrating security into the model ideation phase
- Threat actors targeting ML infrastructure today
- Case study: From research prototype to production risk
- Building credibility through early security alignment
- Decomposing ML systems into attack surfaces
- Data poisoning vectors and detection mechanisms
- Model theft through API exposure patterns
- Inference-time attacks and mitigation layers
- Dependency chains in containerized training
- Supply chain risks in pre-trained models
- Adversarial examples in high-stakes classification
- Logging gaps that hide exploitation attempts
- Privilege escalation in distributed training
- Third-party library vulnerabilities in PyTorch stacks
- Mapping OWASP STRIDE to ML system components
- Creating reusable threat models for standard architectures
- Data lineage requirements for security review
- Cryptographic signing of dataset versions
- Detecting subtle distribution shifts from tampering
- Access patterns that suggest data exfiltration
- Version-controlled data with immutable references
- Audit-ready documentation for data pipelines
- Preventing label flipping in collaborative datasets
- Metadata tagging for compliance classification
- Automated checks for data drift and skew
- Integrity verification at model checkpoint save
- Balancing transparency with intellectual property
- Documenting data decisions for external reviewers
- Input validation strategies for unstructured data
- Token-level filtering for language model inputs
- Sanitizing embeddings before inference
- Adversarial training techniques for resilience
- Detecting prompt injection patterns in real time
- Rate limiting and quota enforcement at API level
- Model confidence monitoring under stress
- Fallback mechanisms when inputs appear suspicious
- Behavioral baselines for anomaly detection
- Logging inputs for forensic reconstruction
- Preventing jailbreak attempts in chat interfaces
- Performance under targeted perturbation testing
- Zero-trust principles for model serving environments
- Network segmentation for inference endpoints
- Encrypted model weights at rest and in transit
- Just-in-time access for debugging sessions
- Immutable containers for production models
- Secrets management in distributed inference
- Role-based access control for model APIs
- Monitoring for abnormal query patterns
- Automated rollback triggers for security events
- Compliance logging for model access events
- Secure update mechanisms for model versioning
- Disaster recovery with security state preservation
- Real-time anomaly detection in prediction traffic
- Monitoring for model drift and concept shift
- Logging inference inputs with privacy safeguards
- Detecting brute-force attacks on model APIs
- Rate limiting strategies without degrading UX
- Automated alerts for suspicious activity patterns
- Model watermarking for attribution and tracking
- Behavioral profiling of legitimate users
- Incident response playbooks for ML systems
- Forensic data retention policies
- Runtime application self-protection patterns
- Integrating with enterprise SIEM tools
- Mapping model decisions to OWASP controls
- Preparing for security review with complete artefacts
- Documenting trade-offs in model design
- Version-controlled model passports
- Standardized threat model templates
- Audit trails for model updates and retraining
- Articulating risk appetite in technical terms
- Responding to findings from red team exercises
- Preparing executive summaries without oversimplifying
- Evidence workflows for automated compliance
- Maintaining living documentation between audits
- Versioning security decisions alongside code
- Translating ML risks for security teams
- Speaking confidently about control boundaries
- Anticipating questions from compliance officers
- Building trust through consistent terminology
- Facilitating joint threat modeling sessions
- Negotiating scope with platform security
- Documenting assumptions for external reviewers
- Presenting trade-offs in model security vs. performance
- Leading post-mortems with security stakeholders
- Incorporating feedback without losing velocity
- Establishing review checkpoints in sprints
- Creating shared ownership of security outcomes
- Dependency scanning for ML libraries
- Vulnerability databases for AI frameworks
- Automated testing for known CVEs in model stacks
- Prioritizing fixes based on exposure level
- Patch management for long-running models
- Zero-day response protocols for ML components
- Integrating SAST into CI/CD for notebooks
- Container scanning for training images
- Firmware-level risks in AI accelerators
- Coordinating disclosures with open-source maintainers
- Responsible disclosure for model-specific flaws
- Maintaining vulnerability history for audits
- Identifying signs of model compromise
- Containment strategies for poisoned models
- Forensic analysis of training data integrity
- Rolling back to known-good model versions
- Communicating incidents to internal teams
- Legal considerations in AI incident disclosure
- Post-incident review with security leadership
- Updating threat models based on real events
- Hardening systems after breach detection
- Reviewing access logs for anomalous patterns
- Preserving evidence for root cause analysis
- Improving detection thresholds after incidents
- Modeling secure behavior as a senior engineer
- Mentoring peers on security best practices
- Introducing lightweight security checks in code reviews
- Celebrating security wins in team meetings
- Reducing friction in security processes
- Building psychological safety for reporting issues
- Advocating for security tooling investments
- Balancing speed and rigor in fast-moving teams
- Leading by example in documentation quality
- Creating rituals for security knowledge sharing
- Recognizing contributors to security improvements
- Sustaining vigilance during product crunch times
- Tracking new OWASP guidance for AI systems
- Evaluating research on novel attack vectors
- Participating in red team exercises proactively
- Contributing to internal security standards
- Sharing lessons across engineering orgs
- Advancing the state of secure ML at scale
- Mentoring the next generation of secure AI builders
- Shaping policy around automated decision-making
- Influencing procurement with security requirements
- Building reputation beyond immediate team
- Establishing go-to status for complex AI security
- Leaving a legacy of secure, trustworthy systems
How this maps to your situation
- Initial development phase with new AI product
- Preparing for first internal security review
- Scaling an existing model to new regions
- Responding to new compliance requirements
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: 90 minutes per module, designed to be completed over 12 weeks with consistent progress.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic cybersecurity courses, this program is tailored specifically to machine learning engineers working in high-exposure environments, with concrete examples and templates aligned to OWASP standards and Meta-scale challenges.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.