A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering MiFID II for Data Scientists in Financial Services
Build compliant, high-velocity data workflows with confidence
The situation this course is for
Data scientists in regulated financial institutions often work in isolation from compliance requirements until late in the delivery cycle. This leads to rework, delayed deployments, and friction between technical and regulatory teams. The lack of shared language slows velocity and increases risk exposure.
Who this is for
A senior Data Scientist in a global financial institution who owns or influences data pipeline design and must navigate MiFID II reporting constraints without sacrificing innovation or speed.
Who this is not for
Entry-level analysts, compliance auditors without data modeling roles, or developers working outside regulated financial data environments.
What you walk away with
- Turn regulatory requirements into actionable data schema rules from day one
- Reduce time from model development to compliance approval by up to 65%
- Produce audit-ready documentation automatically embedded in pipeline outputs
- Align with legal teams using shared, technical artefacts instead of meetings
- Gain recognition as the go-to practitioner for compliant data innovation
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Mapping MiFID II's Article 12 to data provenance requirements
- How transaction reporting rules affect model output logging
- The impact of RTS 23 on data retention and access controls
- Linking best execution obligations to feature engineering
- Regulator expectations for explainability in automated decisions
- How Brexit changed cross-border data flows under MiFID
- Common misalignments between data science teams and compliance units
- Case study: Rejected filing due to missing data lineage
- Timeline of major ESMA enforcement actions since the current cycle
- How national regulators apply MiFID II differently
- The role of data scientists in pre-audit risk assessments
- Building awareness of MiFID II into sprint planning
- Turning Jupyter notebooks into compliance-ready documentation
- Automating metadata tagging to meet RTS 22 requirements
- Designing model cards that satisfy MiFID II disclosure needs
- How to structure DAGs for audit-friendly traceability
- Embedding data dictionaries in pipeline outputs
- Creating version-controlled change logs for reporting models
- Translating feature engineering decisions for non-technical reviewers
- Building compliance checkpoints into CI/CD workflows
- Generating standardized logs for transaction reporting
- Documenting data transformations in plain business language
- Using schema versioning to support regulatory queries
- Aligning data drift detection with periodic review cycles
- Defining minimum viable lineage for MiFID II purposes
- Instrumenting pipelines to capture origin and transformation steps
- Storing lineage data in queryable, regulator-accessible formats
- Linking raw input sources to final reported metrics
- Handling third-party data feeds in audit trails
- Designing lineage retention policies aligned with RTS 23
- Integrating lineage capture with existing observability tools
- Validating completeness of lineage records pre-submission
- Redacting sensitive fields without breaking traceability
- Benchmarking lineage coverage across peer institutions
- Using lineage maps in internal audit preparation
- Responding to follow-up questions from regulators
- Defining benchmark routes for execution quality measurement
- Capturing timestamp precision required under RTS 27
- Aggregating venue performance data for periodic review
- Calculating slippage metrics across asset classes
- Designing alerts for outlier execution patterns
- Mapping trading decisions to client order characteristics
- Handling dark pool and systematic internaliser data
- Integrating market impact models into execution strategy
- Producing regulator-ready summaries of execution quality
- Automating comparisons across broker-dealer performance
- Documenting methodology for internal sign-off
- Updating execution logic based on performance feedback
- Understanding the 61 fields required in each report
- Validating client identifier formats (LEI, ISIN, MIC)
- Mapping internal trade IDs to regulatory submission records
- Handling complex instruments like derivatives and ETFs
- Reconciling internal systems with external reporting outputs
- Implementing automated error detection for missing fields
- Designing fallback processes for system outages
- Tracking latency between execution and report submission
- Auditing report accuracy across randomized samples
- Logging corrections and amendment histories
- Integrating with trade repository interfaces
- Generating test reports for dry-run validation
- Defining when a model qualifies as algorithmic trading
- Documenting strategy intent for regulatory filing
- Implementing kill switch logic in production pipelines
- Monitoring for unintended market impact or spoofing
- Tracking thresholds for volume or order-to-trade ratios
- Automating anomaly detection in trading behavior
- Scheduling periodic performance reviews
- Logging changes to algorithm parameters or logic
- Integrating with market surveillance systems
- Preparing pre-deployment impact assessments
- Capturing stress test results for audit
- Responding to regulator requests for backtesting
- Storing and validating client professional status flags
- Managing enhanced data permissions for retail clients
- Applying differential logging based on client type
- Tracking consent for data usage in model training
- Enforcing access controls for sensitive client segments
- Documenting data minimization practices
- Handling cross-border client data flows
- Updating classifications based on behavioral signals
- Auditing access to high-risk client records
- Generating compliance reports for internal review
- Aligning with GDPR in dual-impact scenarios
- Designing declassification workflows for status changes
- Capturing all sources of implicit and explicit costs
- Aggregating fees across execution, custody, and advice layers
- Calculating performance-impacting deductions
- Time-weighting charges for accurate reporting
- Linking cost data to specific client portfolios
- Validating accuracy of cost attribution logic
- Generating standardized cost summaries for clients
- Building reconciliation checks between systems
- Auditing cost calculations for sample clients
- Updating methodologies when new fee types emerge
- Documenting assumptions in cost modeling
- Supporting regulator inquiries with full cost trails
- Adding MiFID II criteria to user story acceptance checks
- Creating compliance-ready definition of done
- Running joint tech-compliance grooming sessions
- Tracking compliance debt alongside technical debt
- Using automated linting for regulatory keywords
- Building compliance dashboards for team visibility
- Shifting compliance reviews left in the pipeline
- Running mock audits during sprint reviews
- Inviting compliance partners to retrospectives
- Documenting decisions in shared repositories
- Measuring velocity impact of compliance integration
- Celebrating compliance wins in team standups
- Translating data concepts for non-technical stakeholders
- Using visual diagrams to explain pipeline logic
- Scheduling regular sync points with compliance teams
- Creating shared terminology glossaries
- Running joint training sessions on MiFID II updates
- Building trust through early transparency
- Escalating ambiguities before implementation
- Co-developing templates for recurring reports
- Establishing feedback loops for process improvement
- Managing differing priorities across functions
- Leveraging overlap in data quality requirements
- Recognizing team efforts in cross-functional wins
- Designing automated checks for RTS 22 compliance
- Validating data retention policies across storage layers
- Monitoring access logs for audit trail completeness
- Generating self-assessment reports for senior management
- Alerting on potential breaches of trading thresholds
- Running synthetic transaction tests
- Benchmarking compliance posture against peers
- Automating documentation for annual renewals
- Integrating with GRC platforms for centralized visibility
- Logging responses to compliance exceptions
- Updating rulesets when regulations evolve
- Testing failover compliance modes
- Tracking upcoming regulatory consultations
- Participating in industry working groups
- Building modular components for rapid adaptation
- Documenting design rationale for future teams
- Creating onboarding materials for new hires
- Maintaining a living compliance knowledge base
- Using retrospective insights to refine processes
- Measuring the cost of compliance over time
- Sharing best practices across departments
- Advocating for tooling investments
- Mentoring junior data scientists in compliance
- Positioning yourself as a leader in responsible innovation
How this maps to your situation
- Data Scientists at financial institutions balancing innovation with regulatory constraints
- Teams rebuilding pipelines due to late compliance input
- Organizations preparing for unannounced regulatory reviews
- Practitioners seeking recognition as compliance-competent technologists
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: 90 minutes of focused reading and implementation planning, designed for completion on a Sunday morning.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses or dense regulatory PDFs, this course gives you actionable, code-adjacent workflows used by data scientists at leading banks to meet MiFID II without sacrificing velocity.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.