A tailored course, built for your situation
Modern AI Vendor Risk Assessment for Compliance Officers
A 12-module implementation-grade course for compliance and technology leaders navigating AI procurement with confidence
The situation this course is for
Compliance officers are increasingly asked to evaluate complex AI systems without clear frameworks, standardized checklists, or cross-functional alignment. Assessments happen late in the procurement cycle, create bottlenecks, and lack technical depth. This slows innovation and increases exposure to regulatory scrutiny.
Who this is for
Compliance officers, risk leads, and technology governance professionals in mid-to-large organizations adopting third-party AI solutions
Who this is not for
This is not for engineers building in-house AI models or for individuals seeking high-level AI awareness training
What you walk away with
- Apply a structured, repeatable framework for AI vendor risk assessment
- Align technical, legal, and compliance requirements across stakeholders
- Evaluate AI vendors against evolving regulatory expectations
- Use audit-ready documentation and assessment templates
- Lead cross-functional AI procurement reviews with confidence
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining AI in the context of third-party risk
- The compliance officer’s evolving mandate
- Regulatory drivers shaping AI oversight
- Distinguishing AI risk from traditional vendor risk
- Mapping AI use cases to risk profiles
- Key stakeholders in AI procurement workflows
- Lifecycle view of AI vendor engagement
- Common pitfalls in early-stage assessments
- Building a risk taxonomy for AI vendors
- Benchmarking organizational readiness
- The role of policy in AI governance
- Foundational frameworks and reference models
- Overview of AI-specific regulatory initiatives
- Interpreting FTC guidance on AI claims
- EU AI Act implications for procurement
- NIST AI RMF and organizational adoption
- Sector-specific rules in education and public service
- Data protection laws and AI processing
- Algorithmic accountability and fairness expectations
- Transparency requirements for third-party AI
- Enforcement trends and inspection readiness
- Aligning internal policies with external rules
- Preparing for regulatory inquiries
- Maintaining compliance posture over time
- How machine learning differs from traditional software
- Types of AI models and their risk implications
- Understanding training data sources and quality
- Model performance metrics that matter
- Evaluating bias and fairness testing practices
- Interpretability and explainability techniques
- API security and integration risks
- Model drift and monitoring capabilities
- Version control and update management
- Infrastructure and hosting considerations
- Third-party dependencies and supply chain risk
- Red teaming and adversarial testing disclosures
- Timing AI assessments in the procurement cycle
- Pre-RFP risk screening checklists
- Incorporating AI-specific clauses in contracts
- Service level agreements for model performance
- Data rights and ownership provisions
- Audit rights and access to documentation
- Incident reporting and breach notification terms
- Vendor change management protocols
- Exit strategies and data portability
- Subprocessor oversight and transparency
- Liability allocation for AI-generated outcomes
- Renewal and performance review triggers
- Designing a tiered risk classification system
- Scoping assessments based on impact level
- Developing vendor self-assessment questionnaires
- Validating vendor responses with evidence checks
- Conducting technical interviews with vendor teams
- Using scoring models to prioritize risks
- Documenting findings and decision rationale
- Escalation paths for high-risk vendors
- Cross-functional review workflows
- Maintaining assessment version control
- Integrating with GRC platforms
- Reporting results to leadership and audit
- Defining fairness in organizational context
- Common bias types in training data and models
- Vendor documentation on bias testing
- Evaluating demographic parity and error rates
- Disaggregated performance reporting
- Mitigation strategies used by vendors
- Ongoing monitoring for fairness drift
- Stakeholder feedback mechanisms
- Handling contested AI outcomes
- Ethics review board disclosures
- Transparency in decision logic
- Public accountability and redress processes
- Data minimization in AI systems
- Purpose limitation and use case alignment
- Consent management for training data
- Anonymization and de-identification practices
- Cross-border data transfer mechanisms
- Right to access and deletion workflows
- Data retention and deletion schedules
- Logging and audit trail completeness
- Vendor data breach response plans
- Third-party data sourcing disclosures
- PIA and DPIA integration with AI reviews
- Data stewardship accountability
- Secure development lifecycle practices
- Model inversion and membership inference risks
- Adversarial attacks and robustness testing
- API authentication and rate limiting
- Infrastructure security certifications
- Penetration testing disclosures
- Incident response and notification timelines
- Backup and recovery for AI components
- Zero trust architecture alignment
- Supply chain software bill of materials (SBOM)
- Vulnerability disclosure programs
- Security training for vendor development teams
- Building an AI vendor audit package
- Documenting assessment rationale and decisions
- Maintaining version-controlled evidence files
- Creating executive summaries for auditors
- Mapping controls to regulatory requirements
- Third-party attestation and certification review
- SOC 2 reports and AI-specific extensions
- Internal audit coordination strategies
- Preparing for surprise inspections
- Corrective action tracking and closure
- Retention policies for AI risk documentation
- Automating audit trail generation
- Identifying key decision-makers in AI procurement
- Communicating risk in business-relevant terms
- Facilitating joint risk review sessions
- Negotiating trade-offs between speed and safety
- Building trust with technical teams
- Educating stakeholders on AI risk fundamentals
- Creating shared ownership of vendor outcomes
- Escalating unresolved conflicts effectively
- Developing playbooks for common scenarios
- Measuring team alignment over time
- Tracking cross-functional SLAs
- Celebrating risk-informed successes
- Designing continuous monitoring workflows
- Trigger-based reassessment protocols
- Performance dashboards for AI vendors
- Annual review planning and execution
- Change management oversight
- Model update validation processes
- Monitoring for regulatory changes
- Tracking vendor financial and operational health
- Customer support and escalation responsiveness
- Handling vendor acquisition or shutdown
- Renewal risk reassessment
- Lessons learned and process improvement
- Assessing organizational change readiness
- Piloting the framework with one team
- Customizing templates to your context
- Training others on the assessment process
- Integrating with existing risk management tools
- Gaining leadership buy-in and sponsorship
- Measuring adoption and impact
- Scaling across departments
- Maintaining consistency over time
- Updating the framework as AI evolves
- Sharing best practices externally
- Becoming a center of excellence
How this maps to your situation
- You're being asked to assess AI vendors but lack a consistent method
- You're coordinating across teams but struggling to align on risk criteria
- You want to move from reactive reviews to proactive governance
- You're preparing for increased regulatory scrutiny on AI use
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 45, 60 hours of total engagement, designed for completion over 8, 12 weeks with flexible pacing.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or high-level compliance webinars, this program delivers implementation-grade detail specifically for third-party AI risk assessment, combining regulatory insight, technical literacy, and operational execution in one comprehensive package.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.