A tailored course, built for your situation
Sources and specific examples on hand when peers push back on NAIC MAR
Build unshakable reasoning for insurance risk assessments grounded in NAIC MAR
Who this is for
Early career risk and compliance professionals in insurance navigating regulatory frameworks like NAIC MAR
Who this is not for
Executives seeking high-level overviews or vendors looking for product integration guides
What you walk away with
- Articulate the 'why' behind NAIC MAR control selections with cited regulatory guidance
- Reference concrete examples from state filings when defending assessment scope
- Pre-build responses to common technical challenges on materiality thresholds
- Map NAIC MAR requirements directly to evidence packages without external consultants
- Establish go-to status on risk design reviews within cross-functional teams
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What NAIC MAR was designed to solve
- How state regulators interpret materiality
- Comparison with Solvency II scope
- SOX 404 overlap boundaries
- Regulatory timeline without years
- Federal vs state enforcement roles
- Insurer obligations under MAR
- Public comments that shaped final text
- MAR and corporate governance links
- Definitions of key terms
- Material risk classification examples
- How MAR interacts with other state rules
- Mapping controls to risk type
- Using NAIC white papers as support
- Documenting exclusion reasoning
- Control sufficiency benchmarks
- When to escalate for review
- Leveraging past exam findings
- Control overlap handling
- Risk weighting methodology
- Scoping boundary decisions
- Third-party reliance limits
- Justifying automation level
- Time horizon justification
- Matching evidence to control
- Retention period rules
- Format expectations by state
- Sampling methodology standards
- Documentation depth examples
- Electronic record rules
- Third-party attestation use
- Internal audit linkage
- Time-stamping best practices
- Chain of custody basics
- Evidence sufficiency checklist
- Common gaps in peer submissions
- Structuring a defense argument
- Citing NAIC guidance correctly
- Referencing enforcement actions
- Using state bulletin language
- Avoiding overstatement
- Admitting limitations gracefully
- Escalation pathways defined
- Preparing for rework requests
- Version control for responses
- Tone for regulator-facing docs
- Attribution standards
- Keeping responses concise
- Defining material risk
- Percentile benchmarks in use
- Company size adjustments
- Historical loss data use
- Scenario weighting method
- Stress test integration
- Liquidity risk factors
- Reinsurance impact
- Geographic exposure
- Product line volatility
- Market shift allowances
- Management judgment limits
- Setting cross-team expectations
- Scheduling joint reviews
- Creating shared glossaries
- Documenting assumptions
- Version control norms
- Conflict resolution paths
- Escalation thresholds
- Meeting rhythm design
- Decision logging standards
- Feedback integration
- Ownership clarity
- Status reporting templates
- Self-assessment checklists
- Gap identification method
- Remediation tracking
- Evidence readiness audit
- Internal mock review setup
- Findings categorization
- Root cause analysis
- Response drafting workflow
- Follow-up evidence gathering
- Status reporting to leadership
- Lessons from past exams
- Improvement cycle timing
- Parsing ambiguous terms
- Finding official interpretations
- Using Q&As from NAIC
- Interpreting 'reasonable' effort
- Determining 'appropriate' controls
- Assessing 'timely' reporting
- Understanding 'ongoing' monitoring
- Evaluating 'comprehensive' scope
- Handling undefined terms
- Weighing examiner preferences
- Balancing precision and flexibility
- Updating interpretations over time
- Finding relevant precedents
- Evaluating precedent strength
- Citing enforcement actions
- Using peer disclosures
- Benchmarking against peers
- Adjusting for company size
- Documenting deviation reasons
- Updating precedent libraries
- Sharing across teams
- Attribution standards
- Handling outdated examples
- Maintaining legal compliance
- Template design principles
- Version control setup
- Storage location standards
- Access control settings
- Review cycle triggers
- Update responsibility
- Change tracking method
- Archival rules
- Retrieval efficiency
- Cross-team usability
- Integration with workflows
- Audit trail maintenance
- Preparing for tough questions
- Managing time pressure
- Staying within mandate
- Deflecting scope creep
- Clarifying without evasion
- Using data to support claims
- Admitting uncertainty appropriately
- Maintaining professional tone
- Protecting confidentiality
- Escalating when needed
- Following up after meetings
- Documenting agreements
- Capturing examiner feedback
- Analyzing review outcomes
- Prioritizing improvements
- Planning implementation
- Tracking change impact
- Updating templates
- Retraining teams
- Measuring efficiency gains
- Sharing lessons learned
- Updating precedent libraries
- Adjusting risk models
- Reporting progress to leadership
How this maps to your situation
- When a peer questions your control selection
- Preparing for an internal audit review
- Responding to a manager’s request for changes
- Building a risk assessment from scratch
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3-4 hours per module, designed for completion within 60 days.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses exclusively on NAIC MAR with verifiable sources, real filing examples, and actionable templates tailored to insurance risk professionals.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.