Description

A focused course, tailored for you

OT Security from Assessment to Remediation Roadmap

For industrial cybersecurity practitioners who need to turn technically accurate OT findings into funded remediation programs that industrial clients actually execute.

The IEC 62443 gap report is forty-seven pages and technically correct. The remediation budget never arrived. The plant CFO looked at the findings list and could not connect a single one to a production downtime figure or a regulatory consequence he recognized.

$199 one-time

Tailored to your situation. Access within 24 hours. 30-day money-back.

Includes a hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access, generated for your specific situation.

Why this course

OT security consulting practitioners with genuine industrial floor experience consistently hit the same ceiling: technically accurate assessments that do not convert to funded remediation programs. The zone-and-conduit design is correct. The vulnerability findings are real. The risk register is complete. And yet the capital review passes without approving a single remediation line item, because the findings never reached the people controlling the budget in language those people can act on.

The problem is not the technical work. The problem is the translation layer between OT engineering reality and industrial business decision-making. IEC 62443 certification courses teach the standard. They do not teach how to build a consequence-weighted risk case, how to sequence remediation across NERC CIP and IEC 62443 obligations simultaneously, how to negotiate a network segmentation design that OT engineers will accept, or how to run containment when isolating a compromised PLC segment might stop the production line.

This course teaches the full consulting engagement arc: from passive asset discovery on a live industrial network through the no-patch conversation with plant engineers through the board-level risk case format and into the 90-day remediation plan that survives the client's annual planning cycle.

What you walk away with

Build a zone-and-conduit model from a live brownfield plant network without requiring a network redesign the OT engineering team will reject.
Conduct an OT vulnerability assessment using passive discovery techniques that do not risk production disruption or trigger change-freeze violations.
Translate OT technical findings into a consequence-weighted risk case that connects each finding to a production downtime figure, regulatory exposure, or insurance implication the client's planning process can fund against.
Design a phased network segmentation roadmap that IT security teams and OT engineers will both accept.
Produce a 90-day remediation plan and a 12-month capital program in the format industrial client annual planning cycles require.

The 12 modules

Module 1. Reading the OT Environment

Industrial networks are not IT networks with different names. This module covers SCADA topology fundamentals including PLCs, HMIs, historian servers, DCS, and remote I/O, along with industrial protocols such as Modbus, PROFINET, DNP3, and OPC-UA. You learn the asset discovery challenge in environments where active scanning can crash production equipment, build a baseline asset inventory using passive network capture techniques, and document the communication flows that underpin the operational process.

Module 2. IEC 62443 Zone-and-Conduit Mapping

IEC 62443 divides industrial networks into zones, which are groups of assets with similar security requirements, and conduits, which are the communication paths between zones. This module walks through zone-and-conduit design against a real plant network topology, teaching you to identify zone boundaries from process function rather than physical topology, assign security levels per zone, and document the conduit architecture in the form your client's engineering team will recognize and validate.

Module 3. The OT Vulnerability Assessment Without Downtime

Passive scanning, traffic capture, and firmware review techniques that identify vulnerabilities without sending a single active probe to a PLC or controller. This module covers passive discovery tooling, the no-patch conversation with OT engineers, and how to communicate residual risk from unmitigatable legacy vulnerabilities in a form the client can act on without triggering engineer resistance to the entire engagement or creating liability for the assessment team.

Module 4. Translating OT Risk into Board-Level Language

A technically accurate finding in OT terms does not unlock remediation budget. This module teaches the consequence-based translation from technical finding to production downtime estimate, to revenue impact per hour of outage, to regulatory notification trigger, to insurance implication. You build the board-level risk case format that connects each OT vulnerability to a financial or operational consequence the client's planning process can fund against and the plant CFO can approve.

Module 5. NERC CIP and Sector-Specific OT Obligations

Many OT environments carry sector-specific compliance obligations alongside IEC 62443: NERC CIP for bulk electric systems, TSA security directives for pipelines and rail, and ICS-CERT guidance for critical infrastructure operators. This module covers how to layer NERC CIP requirements alongside an IEC 62443 gap analysis, identify where the standards reinforce each other and where they conflict, and sequence the remediation program when the client has overlapping regulatory obligations across multiple frameworks.

Module 6. Network Segmentation Design for OT Environments

The Purdue model is the starting point. The real design challenge is implementing it in a brownfield plant where IT and OT networks grew together without boundaries and OT engineers have change-freeze constraints on production-critical systems. This module covers practical segmentation approaches including IT/OT DMZ design, unidirectional gateways, jump server architecture, and network capture points, with the negotiation framework for reaching a segmentation design the plant team will accept and engineering leadership will sign off on.

Module 7. Vendor and Supply Chain Risk in Industrial Environments

OT vendors deliver components with embedded firmware, proprietary protocols, and remote access capabilities that industrial clients often cannot audit or modify. This module covers third-party access risk including vendor VPNs and remote maintenance windows, firmware integrity checking, component provenance documentation, and how to write supply chain security requirements into the procurement and vendor management clauses your client controls at contract renewal or equipment refresh.

Module 8. OT Incident Response When You Cannot Take the Plant Offline

When a PLC is compromised in a running plant, the IT incident response playbook does not apply. Isolating the affected network segment may stop the production line. This module covers OT-specific containment strategies including traffic shunting, shadow monitoring, and managed fallback to manual operations, along with forensic evidence collection from live industrial equipment and the client communication protocol for managing a security incident in an environment where availability is not negotiable.

Module 9. Building the Remediation Roadmap

Risk prioritization in OT is not CVSS score ranking. A moderate CVSS score on a safety instrumented system may take priority over a critical CVSS score on an office workstation with historian access. This module teaches consequence-weighted prioritization, the 90-day quick-win remediation plan, the 12-month capital program structure, and how to present both in the format reviewed and approved in a typical industrial client's annual planning cycle without losing the technical grounding the OT team requires.

Module 10. Resolving the IT/OT Security Architecture Conflict

IT security teams want zero trust, multi-factor authentication, and endpoint detection on every device. OT engineers have real-time deterministic requirements that authentication delays and detection agents can violate. This module covers the seven most common IT/OT security architecture conflicts in industrial environments, the technical resolution options for each conflict, and the governance model that gives both teams structured input into decisions that cross the IT/OT boundary without creating deadlock.

Module 11. The Client-Facing OT Security Deliverables

OT security assessment reports, risk registers, and remediation roadmaps that your client's engineering team, CISO, and board can each read without a translation layer. This module covers report structure, the executive summary format for OT risk findings, the risk register schema covering consequence severity, likelihood, current control status, and remediation ownership, and the 90-day plan format. You produce one complete client-ready deliverable set as the module output, ready to submit.

Module 12. Sustaining the OT Security Program After Engagement Close

A one-time OT assessment creates a point-in-time snapshot. This module covers the governance structure including OT security steering committee roles and decision rights, the KPI set that tracks program health over time such as mean time to patch critical findings and vendor access event review rate, the quarterly review cadence, and the client capability-building plan that reduces external consultant dependency while keeping the OT security program active and measurably improving.

How this addresses your situation

Specific modules that map to what you said you are dealing with.

You delivered an OT gap assessment that was technically complete, but the remediation budget never arrived because the risk language did not connect to the client's planning process or the plant CFO's decision criteria.

You are running an IEC 62443 zone-and-conduit design in a brownfield plant where the IT and OT networks grew together for over a decade and no logical zone boundary maps to a physical topology you can segment without major infrastructure work and OT engineer resistance.

You are advising a client with NERC CIP compliance obligations alongside IEC 62443 gaps and need to sequence the remediation program across both frameworks without duplicating effort or creating conflicting remediation timelines.

You are managing your client's first OT security incident and neither the IT security team nor the OT engineers have a containment protocol for a scenario where isolating the affected segment could stop the production line.

What you get with this course

12 text-based modules covering the full OT security consulting engagement arc from passive asset discovery through zone-and-conduit design, risk translation, segmentation, incident response, and sustained client program governance.
Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module: zone-and-conduit mapping worksheets, passive discovery protocol, consequence-weighted risk case format, board-level risk register schema, 90-day remediation plan, 12-month capital program structure, and complete client deliverable set.
Hand-built implementation playbook tailored to your account mix and the industrial sectors your clients operate in, delivered alongside course access.
Access to the Art of Service learning environment, self-paced with no expiry.

What you will have in hand by Day 1, Week 1, Month 1

Purchase completes on store.theartofservice.com.

Within 24 hours: account provisioned in the Art of Service learning environment and hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.

Before and after

Before

Technically accurate OT gap assessments that sit in client inboxes because the findings never reached the people controlling the remediation budget in language those people can act on, and remediation programs that get scoped but never funded.

After

The full consulting engagement arc from passive floor assessment through a consequence-weighted risk case to a funded remediation roadmap, with the risk translation and client-management skills to make each engagement close with an approved capital program, not just a delivered report.

What happens if you do not address this

OT environments that receive a gap assessment without a funded remediation program are more exposed than before the engagement, because the threat surface is now documented and the client has taken no action against it. The practitioner who cannot close the gap between technically accurate finding and funded remediation leaves every engagement commercially incomplete and the client operationally at risk.

Who it is for

OT cybersecurity practitioners and consultants who have direct industrial environment experience, including familiarity with SCADA systems, PLCs, DCS, industrial protocols, and plant floor topology, and who now advise industrial clients on OT security strategy. They deliver IEC 62443 gap assessments, structure remediation roadmaps, and need the engagement-management and risk-communication skills to turn technically accurate findings into programs the client funds and executes. Common backgrounds include industrial automation, manufacturing, energy, utilities, oil and gas, or related process industries.

Who this is NOT for. IT security generalists without hands-on OT environment exposure, or OT engineers who do not engage in client-facing advisory or consulting work.

How it arrives

Text-based course in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every module, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.

Time investment. Approximately 8 to 12 hours of module reading and template work, self-paced with no expiry.

Why $199 is the right number

IEC 62443 certification training covers the standard in depth but not the consulting engagement methodology: how to translate findings into funded programs, how to negotiate with OT engineers, or how to sequence remediation across overlapping regulatory obligations. Generic cybersecurity frameworks do not address OT-specific constraints such as no-patch environments, real-time determinism requirements, and consequence-based risk prioritization. This course teaches the gap between knowing the standard and delivering a funded result the industrial client executes.

FAQ

The course covers IEC 62443 and NERC CIP. What about NIST SP 800-82 or other sector guidance?

Module content references NIST SP 800-82 as a complementary framework alongside IEC 62443 and NERC CIP. The zone-and-conduit and consequence-weighted risk case approaches in the course are framework-portable: the methodology applies regardless of which standard your client's sector regulator references, including ICS-CERT advisories and sector-specific TSA directives.

I already hold an IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Certificate for Professionals. What does this add?

The certification covers the standard's technical content. This course covers the consulting engagement layer: how to run the assessment without downtime risk, how to translate findings into board-level risk cases, how to sequence remediation across overlapping obligations, and how to produce the deliverables that get the remediation budget approved. Most IEC 62443 practitioners find that the standard knowledge is not the gap; the engagement methodology is.

How is the implementation playbook tailored to my situation?

Within 24 hours of purchase, the hand-built playbook is delivered alongside course access. It is built from your role context and account mix: the industrial sectors your clients operate in, the regulatory obligations they carry, and the typical engagement scope you run. If anything in the playbook does not fit your situation, reply and it will be adjusted.

30-day money-back guarantee. If after a week of working through the materials this is not what you needed, reply to the receipt email and a full refund is processed. No questions, no forms.

Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.