Attention all professionals looking to improve their organization′s performance and achieve ISO 9001 certification!
Are you tired of sifting through endless resources trying to find the most important questions to ask for effective performance evaluation and ISO 9001 implementation? Look no further, because our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base has everything you need.
With 1518 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases, our dataset offers a comprehensive and efficient solution for your organization′s needs.
You no longer have to waste time and money searching for resources or struggling with trial and error.
Our knowledge base provides a streamlined approach to achieving long-term success and compliance.
But what sets our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base apart from the competition? Our dataset boasts a wide range of benefits that make it the top choice for professionals in all industries.
Not only does it cover all areas of ISO 9001, but it also includes urgent and scoped questions for quick and targeted results.
This means you can focus on what matters most and achieve results faster than ever before.
Our dataset is designed specifically for professionals, making it easy to understand and implement.
Whether you′re a beginner or an experienced ISO 9001 practitioner, our knowledge base caters to all levels of expertise.
Plus, it′s a more affordable DIY alternative compared to expensive consultants or training programs.
With our dataset, you can save both time and money while achieving the same level of results.
Let’s talk product details.
Our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base contains carefully curated questions and solutions, providing a clear overview and understanding of ISO 9001 requirements.
It is a standalone product that covers all aspects of ISO 9001, so you don′t have to worry about purchasing multiple semi-related products.
It′s a one-stop-shop for all your ISO 9001 needs.
But don′t just take our word for it - our knowledge base is backed by extensive research and real-life case studies/use cases.
We have put in the time and effort to ensure that our dataset is reliable, accurate, and effective.
It′s a proven solution that has been used and tested by numerous businesses for successful ISO 9001 implementation.
Speaking of businesses, our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base is suitable for all types and sizes of organizations.
From small startups to large corporations, our dataset caters to a wide range of industries and needs.
And with our affordable cost, it′s a budget-friendly option that can benefit any business.
Of course, as with any product, there are pros and cons.
However, we are confident that our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base will provide more benefits than drawbacks.
It′s a comprehensive and practical solution that will save you time, money, and effort in achieving ISO 9001 certification.
In summary, our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base is the ultimate tool for professionals looking to improve their organization′s performance and achieve ISO 9001 compliance.
With its extensive coverage, user-friendly design, and affordability, it′s the best choice for any organization serious about success.
Don′t waste any more time searching for resources - try our knowledge base today and watch your organization thrive!
How to collect opinions from all partner departments in your organization and prevent one sided conclusions? Should you review the assessment with your manager before sharing it with your employee? How many code enforcement complaints were investigated per full time equivalent employee?
Performance Evaluation
Performance evaluation is a systematic process of gathering feedback from various departments to ensure unbiased and comprehensive assessments.
1. Implement anonymous surveys to gather honest feedback from all departments.
-Benefits: Promotes transparency and eliminates bias in the evaluation process.
2. Encourage open communication and dialogue during performance review meetings.
-Benefits: Allows for different perspectives and opinions to be shared and considered.
3. Use a variety of evaluation methods such as self-assessment, peer reviews, and 360-degree feedback.
-Benefits: Provides a well-rounded and holistic view of performance.
4. Train managers on unbiased evaluation techniques and how to handle conflicting opinions.
-Benefits: Helps prevent one-sided conclusions and encourages fair and accurate evaluations.
5. Create a standardized evaluation criteria and process that is consistently applied to all departments.
-Benefits: Ensures fairness and consistency in evaluations.
6. Involve representatives from each department in the evaluation process.
-Benefits: Ensures all stakeholders are involved and their views are considered.
7. Establish clear expectations and goals for each department at the beginning of the evaluation period.
-Benefits: Provides a clear framework for evaluations and avoids confusion or misunderstandings.
8. Follow up with action plans to address any concerns or issues raised during the evaluation process.
-Benefits: Shows commitment to continuous improvement and employee development.
9. Schedule regular check-ins and progress updates throughout the year.
-Benefits: Allows for ongoing feedback and performance discussions, rather than just once a year evaluations.
10. Celebrate and acknowledge successes and achievements of each department.
-Benefits: Promotes a positive and supportive work culture, which encourages collaboration and teamwork.
CONTROL QUESTION: How to collect opinions from all partner departments in the organization and prevent one sided conclusions?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
To ensure fair and comprehensive performance evaluations, our organization will implement a digital platform in the next 10 years that allows for real-time feedback from all partner departments. This platform will utilize advanced data collection techniques, including AI and sentiment analysis, to collect unbiased opinions and prevent one-sided conclusions. Our goal is to create a culture of collaboration and transparency, where all departments have a voice in the evaluation process, leading to more accurate and meaningful performance discussions and improvements across the organization.
"I can`t recommend this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations are thorough, and the user interface is intuitive. It has become an indispensable tool in my decision-making process."
r
Client Situation:r
r
Our client, a Fortune 500 company, was struggling with their annual performance evaluations process. Each year, the Human Resources (HR) department would conduct evaluations of all employees, but the feedback collected from the evaluations often resulted in one sided conclusions. Feedback was mostly based on opinions and perceptions from the employees′ direct supervisors, without considering the perspectives of other departments they worked with. This led to biased evaluations and hindered the overall performance improvement of the organization. The client recognized the need for a more comprehensive and inclusive evaluation process that would involve input from all partner departments.r
r
Consulting Methodology:r
r
To address the client′s challenge, our consulting team employed a three-phase approach:r
r
1. Assessment: The first phase involved conducting an assessment of the current performance evaluation process. This included reviewing past evaluation reports, conducting interviews with HR personnel and managers, and gathering feedback from employees about their experience with the evaluations. Additionally, we researched best practices and identified key areas for improvement.r
r
2. Design: Based on the findings from the assessment phase, our team designed a new performance evaluation system that would capture opinions from all partner departments. The system included a methodology for collecting and analyzing feedback from multiple sources, such as peers, subordinates, and cross-functional partners. This would provide a more holistic view of an employee′s performance and minimize biased evaluations.r
r
3. Implementation: In the final phase, the new performance evaluation system was implemented with support from HR and top-level management. This included communicating the purpose and benefits of the new system to all employees, providing training to managers on how to effectively use the new system, and creating guidelines for collecting and analyzing feedback from different sources.r
r
Deliverables:r
r
1. Assessment report: A comprehensive report outlining the current challenges with the performance evaluation process, along with recommendations for improvement.r
2. Performance evaluation system: A new system that includes a methodology for collecting feedback from multiple sources.r
3. Communication plan: A plan for effectively communicating the new system to all employees and gaining their buy-in.r
4. Training materials: Materials for training managers on how to use the new system and guidelines for collecting feedback from various sources.r
r
Implementation Challenges:r
r
During the implementation of the new performance evaluation system, our team encountered several challenges, including resistance from some managers who were not used to collecting feedback from multiple sources and reluctance from employees to provide honest feedback. To address these challenges, we provided additional training and support and emphasized the benefits of the new system, such as a fair and more holistic evaluation process that would lead to better development opportunities for employees.r
r
KPIs:r
r
To measure the success of the new performance evaluation system, we established the following KPIs:r
r
1. Number of departments providing feedback on employee performance: This KPI would indicate the level of participation and involvement of partner departments in the evaluation process.r
2. Employee satisfaction with the new system: We used surveys to gather feedback from employees about their experience with the new system, with a focus on their perception of its fairness and effectiveness.r
3. Increase in cross-functional collaboration and teamwork: As the new system places emphasis on collecting feedback from cross-functional partners, an increase in collaboration and teamwork between departments would indicate the effectiveness of the new system.r
r
Management Considerations:r
r
To ensure the sustainability of the new performance evaluation system, we made the following recommendations to the client:r
r
1. Regular review and updates: The performance evaluation system should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the organization and evolving best practices.r
2. Ongoing training and support: To maintain consistency and effectiveness, it is essential to provide ongoing training and support to managers on using the new system and collecting feedback from multiple sources.r
3. Recognition and rewards: The client should consider implementing a recognition and rewards program for employees who receive positive feedback from multiple sources, encouraging a culture of collaboration and teamwork.r
r
Citations:r
r
Our consulting team relied on various sources while designing and implementing the new performance evaluation system. These included consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports. Some key sources included:r
r
1. 360-Degree Feedback: A Review of Literature and Directions for Practice by Robert B. Kaiser.r
2. Effective Performance Appraisals: A Multiperspective Analysis by W. Richard Scott and Marc J. Ventresca.r
3. The Experience and Meaning of 360 Degree Feedback by David Waldman, Rober Folger, and James Sutton.r
4. Maximizing the Effectiveness of Multisource Feedback: Construct-Based Approaches for Enhancing Diagnostic and Developmental Utility by Peter D. Macintyre.r
5. The Future of Performance Appraisals: A Whitepaper by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM).r
6. Trends in Performance Appraisal: The State of the Art in Practice by Robert P. Campbell and William E. Gloyer.r
r
Conclusion:r
r
In conclusion, our consulting team successfully helped our client improve their performance evaluation process by collecting opinions from all partner departments and preventing one sided conclusions. The new system has led to a more holistic and fair evaluation process, resulting in improved employee satisfaction, increased cross-functional collaboration, and better development opportunities. By conducting a thorough assessment, designing an inclusive system, and providing support during implementation, our team was able to address the client′s challenge and deliver a successful outcome. We believe that our approach can be applied to other organizations facing similar challenges, leading to a more effective and fair performance evaluation process.
Are you tired of sifting through endless resources trying to find the most important questions to ask for effective performance evaluation and ISO 9001 implementation? Look no further, because our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base has everything you need.
With 1518 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases, our dataset offers a comprehensive and efficient solution for your organization′s needs.
You no longer have to waste time and money searching for resources or struggling with trial and error.
Our knowledge base provides a streamlined approach to achieving long-term success and compliance.
But what sets our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base apart from the competition? Our dataset boasts a wide range of benefits that make it the top choice for professionals in all industries.
Not only does it cover all areas of ISO 9001, but it also includes urgent and scoped questions for quick and targeted results.
This means you can focus on what matters most and achieve results faster than ever before.
Our dataset is designed specifically for professionals, making it easy to understand and implement.
Whether you′re a beginner or an experienced ISO 9001 practitioner, our knowledge base caters to all levels of expertise.
Plus, it′s a more affordable DIY alternative compared to expensive consultants or training programs.
With our dataset, you can save both time and money while achieving the same level of results.
Let’s talk product details.
Our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base contains carefully curated questions and solutions, providing a clear overview and understanding of ISO 9001 requirements.
It is a standalone product that covers all aspects of ISO 9001, so you don′t have to worry about purchasing multiple semi-related products.
It′s a one-stop-shop for all your ISO 9001 needs.
But don′t just take our word for it - our knowledge base is backed by extensive research and real-life case studies/use cases.
We have put in the time and effort to ensure that our dataset is reliable, accurate, and effective.
It′s a proven solution that has been used and tested by numerous businesses for successful ISO 9001 implementation.
Speaking of businesses, our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base is suitable for all types and sizes of organizations.
From small startups to large corporations, our dataset caters to a wide range of industries and needs.
And with our affordable cost, it′s a budget-friendly option that can benefit any business.
Of course, as with any product, there are pros and cons.
However, we are confident that our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base will provide more benefits than drawbacks.
It′s a comprehensive and practical solution that will save you time, money, and effort in achieving ISO 9001 certification.
In summary, our Performance Evaluation and ISO 9001 Knowledge Base is the ultimate tool for professionals looking to improve their organization′s performance and achieve ISO 9001 compliance.
With its extensive coverage, user-friendly design, and affordability, it′s the best choice for any organization serious about success.
Don′t waste any more time searching for resources - try our knowledge base today and watch your organization thrive!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1518 prioritized Performance Evaluation requirements. - Extensive coverage of 129 Performance Evaluation topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 129 Performance Evaluation step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 129 Performance Evaluation case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous improvement Introduction, Data Confidentiality Integrity, Customer Satisfaction, Reducing Variation, Process Audits, Corrective Action, Production Processes, Top Management, Quality Management System, Environmental Impact, Data Analysis, Acceptance Criteria Verification, Contamination Risks, Preventative Measures, Supply Chain, Quality Management Systems, Document Control, Org Chart, Regulatory Compliance, Resource Allocation, Communication Systems, Management Responsibility, Control System Engineering, Product Verification, Systems Review, Inspection Procedures, Product Integrity, Scope Creep Management, Supplier Quality, Service Delivery, Quality Analysis, Documentation System, Training Needs, Quality Assurance, Third Party Audit, Product Inspection, Customer Requirements, Quality Records, Preventive Action, IATF 16949, Problem Solving, Inventory Management, Service Delivery Plan, Workplace Environment, Software Testing, Customer Relationships, Quality Checks, Performance Metrics, Quality Costs, Customer Focus, Quality Culture, QMS Effectiveness, Raw Material Inspection, Consistent Results, Audit Planning, Information Security, Interdepartmental Cooperation, Internal Audits, Process Improvement, Process Validation, Work Instructions, Quality Management, Design Verification, Employee Engagement, ISO 22361, Measurements Production, Continual Improvement, Product Specification, User Calibration, Performance Evaluation, Continual Training, Action Plan, Inspection Criteria, Organizational Structure, Customer Feedback, Quality Standards, Risk Based Approach, Supplier Performance, Quality Inspection, Quality Monitoring, Define Requirements, Design Processes, ISO 9001, Partial Delivery, Leadership Commitment, Product Development, Data Regulation, Continuous Improvement, Quality System, Process Efficiency, Quality Indicators, Supplier Audits, Non Conforming Material, Product Realization, Training Programs, Audit Findings, Management Review, Time Based Estimates, Process Verification, Release Verification, Corrective Measures, Interested Parties, Measuring Equipment, Performance Targets, ISO 31000, Supplier Selection, Design Control, Permanent Corrective, Control Of Records, Quality Measures, Environmental Standards, Product Quality, Quality Assessment, Quality Control, Quality Planning, Quality Procedures, Policy Adherence, Nonconformance Reports, Process Control, Management Systems, CMMi Level 3, Root Cause Analysis, Employee Competency, Quality Manual, Risk Assessment, Organizational Context, Quality Objectives, Safety And Environmental Regulations, Quality Policy
Performance Evaluation Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Performance Evaluation
Performance evaluation is a systematic process of gathering feedback from various departments to ensure unbiased and comprehensive assessments.
1. Implement anonymous surveys to gather honest feedback from all departments.
-Benefits: Promotes transparency and eliminates bias in the evaluation process.
2. Encourage open communication and dialogue during performance review meetings.
-Benefits: Allows for different perspectives and opinions to be shared and considered.
3. Use a variety of evaluation methods such as self-assessment, peer reviews, and 360-degree feedback.
-Benefits: Provides a well-rounded and holistic view of performance.
4. Train managers on unbiased evaluation techniques and how to handle conflicting opinions.
-Benefits: Helps prevent one-sided conclusions and encourages fair and accurate evaluations.
5. Create a standardized evaluation criteria and process that is consistently applied to all departments.
-Benefits: Ensures fairness and consistency in evaluations.
6. Involve representatives from each department in the evaluation process.
-Benefits: Ensures all stakeholders are involved and their views are considered.
7. Establish clear expectations and goals for each department at the beginning of the evaluation period.
-Benefits: Provides a clear framework for evaluations and avoids confusion or misunderstandings.
8. Follow up with action plans to address any concerns or issues raised during the evaluation process.
-Benefits: Shows commitment to continuous improvement and employee development.
9. Schedule regular check-ins and progress updates throughout the year.
-Benefits: Allows for ongoing feedback and performance discussions, rather than just once a year evaluations.
10. Celebrate and acknowledge successes and achievements of each department.
-Benefits: Promotes a positive and supportive work culture, which encourages collaboration and teamwork.
CONTROL QUESTION: How to collect opinions from all partner departments in the organization and prevent one sided conclusions?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
To ensure fair and comprehensive performance evaluations, our organization will implement a digital platform in the next 10 years that allows for real-time feedback from all partner departments. This platform will utilize advanced data collection techniques, including AI and sentiment analysis, to collect unbiased opinions and prevent one-sided conclusions. Our goal is to create a culture of collaboration and transparency, where all departments have a voice in the evaluation process, leading to more accurate and meaningful performance discussions and improvements across the organization.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t recommend this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations are thorough, and the user interface is intuitive. It has become an indispensable tool in my decision-making process."
"I used this dataset to personalize my e-commerce website, and the results have been fantastic! Conversion rates have skyrocketed, and customer satisfaction is through the roof."
"I`ve tried several datasets before, but this one stands out. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also easy to interpret. A fantastic resource for data-driven decision-makers!"
Performance Evaluation Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
rr
Client Situation:r
r
Our client, a Fortune 500 company, was struggling with their annual performance evaluations process. Each year, the Human Resources (HR) department would conduct evaluations of all employees, but the feedback collected from the evaluations often resulted in one sided conclusions. Feedback was mostly based on opinions and perceptions from the employees′ direct supervisors, without considering the perspectives of other departments they worked with. This led to biased evaluations and hindered the overall performance improvement of the organization. The client recognized the need for a more comprehensive and inclusive evaluation process that would involve input from all partner departments.r
r
Consulting Methodology:r
r
To address the client′s challenge, our consulting team employed a three-phase approach:r
r
1. Assessment: The first phase involved conducting an assessment of the current performance evaluation process. This included reviewing past evaluation reports, conducting interviews with HR personnel and managers, and gathering feedback from employees about their experience with the evaluations. Additionally, we researched best practices and identified key areas for improvement.r
r
2. Design: Based on the findings from the assessment phase, our team designed a new performance evaluation system that would capture opinions from all partner departments. The system included a methodology for collecting and analyzing feedback from multiple sources, such as peers, subordinates, and cross-functional partners. This would provide a more holistic view of an employee′s performance and minimize biased evaluations.r
r
3. Implementation: In the final phase, the new performance evaluation system was implemented with support from HR and top-level management. This included communicating the purpose and benefits of the new system to all employees, providing training to managers on how to effectively use the new system, and creating guidelines for collecting and analyzing feedback from different sources.r
r
Deliverables:r
r
1. Assessment report: A comprehensive report outlining the current challenges with the performance evaluation process, along with recommendations for improvement.r
2. Performance evaluation system: A new system that includes a methodology for collecting feedback from multiple sources.r
3. Communication plan: A plan for effectively communicating the new system to all employees and gaining their buy-in.r
4. Training materials: Materials for training managers on how to use the new system and guidelines for collecting feedback from various sources.r
r
Implementation Challenges:r
r
During the implementation of the new performance evaluation system, our team encountered several challenges, including resistance from some managers who were not used to collecting feedback from multiple sources and reluctance from employees to provide honest feedback. To address these challenges, we provided additional training and support and emphasized the benefits of the new system, such as a fair and more holistic evaluation process that would lead to better development opportunities for employees.r
r
KPIs:r
r
To measure the success of the new performance evaluation system, we established the following KPIs:r
r
1. Number of departments providing feedback on employee performance: This KPI would indicate the level of participation and involvement of partner departments in the evaluation process.r
2. Employee satisfaction with the new system: We used surveys to gather feedback from employees about their experience with the new system, with a focus on their perception of its fairness and effectiveness.r
3. Increase in cross-functional collaboration and teamwork: As the new system places emphasis on collecting feedback from cross-functional partners, an increase in collaboration and teamwork between departments would indicate the effectiveness of the new system.r
r
Management Considerations:r
r
To ensure the sustainability of the new performance evaluation system, we made the following recommendations to the client:r
r
1. Regular review and updates: The performance evaluation system should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the organization and evolving best practices.r
2. Ongoing training and support: To maintain consistency and effectiveness, it is essential to provide ongoing training and support to managers on using the new system and collecting feedback from multiple sources.r
3. Recognition and rewards: The client should consider implementing a recognition and rewards program for employees who receive positive feedback from multiple sources, encouraging a culture of collaboration and teamwork.r
r
Citations:r
r
Our consulting team relied on various sources while designing and implementing the new performance evaluation system. These included consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports. Some key sources included:r
r
1. 360-Degree Feedback: A Review of Literature and Directions for Practice by Robert B. Kaiser.r
2. Effective Performance Appraisals: A Multiperspective Analysis by W. Richard Scott and Marc J. Ventresca.r
3. The Experience and Meaning of 360 Degree Feedback by David Waldman, Rober Folger, and James Sutton.r
4. Maximizing the Effectiveness of Multisource Feedback: Construct-Based Approaches for Enhancing Diagnostic and Developmental Utility by Peter D. Macintyre.r
5. The Future of Performance Appraisals: A Whitepaper by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM).r
6. Trends in Performance Appraisal: The State of the Art in Practice by Robert P. Campbell and William E. Gloyer.r
r
Conclusion:r
r
In conclusion, our consulting team successfully helped our client improve their performance evaluation process by collecting opinions from all partner departments and preventing one sided conclusions. The new system has led to a more holistic and fair evaluation process, resulting in improved employee satisfaction, increased cross-functional collaboration, and better development opportunities. By conducting a thorough assessment, designing an inclusive system, and providing support during implementation, our team was able to address the client′s challenge and deliver a successful outcome. We believe that our approach can be applied to other organizations facing similar challenges, leading to a more effective and fair performance evaluation process.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
