A tailored course, built for your situation
Premium engagement picks with ISO 42001 implementation
Designed for developer support specialists leading security and compliance enablement
Who this is for
Developer Support Specialist at a high-growth tech company, embedded in developer-facing infrastructure with growing responsibility for compliance enablement and control implementation
Who this is not for
This is not for compliance generalists, external auditors, or executives seeking board-level summaries. It is tailored to technical practitioners who implement frameworks, not delegate them.
What you walk away with
- Prioritise and select high-impact engagements using ISO 42001 control criteria
- Produce stakeholder-ready statements of applicability (SoA) in under 10 days
- Lead cross-functional control mapping sessions without senior oversight
- Re-use modular control templates across developer-facing compliance cycles
- Earn direct assignment of AI governance escalations from engineering leads
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining AI governance in developer support context
- Mapping ISO 42001 to developer onboarding
- Identifying control touchpoints in support tickets
- Linking AI controls to platform reliability
- Establishing governance escalation paths
- Documenting developer feedback loops
- Integrating AI risk into triage workflows
- Using support data to inform control scope
- Recognizing high-risk developer patterns
- Building control-aware support templates
- Coordinating with security engineering
- Tracking governance touchpoint frequency
- Identifying AI-driven features in platform
- Classifying AI system criticality
- Mapping data flows for AI components
- Determining system ownership
- Setting scope boundaries for audit
- Documenting AI model inventory
- Assessing third-party AI dependencies
- Evaluating training data sources
- Tracking model versioning in support
- Linking scope to developer access logs
- Using support history to refine scope
- Producing scope justification artefacts
- Reviewing ISO 42001 control A.8.1
- Mapping access controls to developer roles
- Implementing authentication safeguards
- Defining API usage policies
- Configuring rate limiting for AI endpoints
- Enforcing logging standards
- Validating model input sanitation
- Setting up model drift alerts
- Auditing prompt access controls
- Securing model training environments
- Controlling fine-tuning permissions
- Managing AI sandbox access
- Framing risk with developer language
- Identifying AI failure modes
- Assessing bias in developer tools
- Evaluating model explainability gaps
- Rating likelihood using incident data
- Quantifying impact on developer trust
- Linking risk to SLA commitments
- Validating assumptions with logs
- Prioritizing risks by support volume
- Documenting risk treatment plans
- Presenting findings to engineering leads
- Updating risk register quarterly
- Structuring SoA for technical teams
- Justifying control implementation status
- Documenting API authentication controls
- Referencing access policy documents
- Linking controls to existing safeguards
- Explaining deviations clearly
- Including developer workflow notes
- Using support ticket trends as evidence
- Aligning SoA with audit timelines
- Versioning SoA for reuse
- Redacting sensitive system details
- Sharing SoA with engineering leads
- Defining AI developer roles
- Mapping roles to least privilege
- Implementing just-in-time access
- Auditing access change requests
- Integrating with identity providers
- Enforcing MFA for AI systems
- Managing service account access
- Reviewing access quarterly
- Automating access revocation
- Logging access changes
- Linking access to incident response
- Reporting access metrics to leads
- Securing model training data
- Validating data preprocessing steps
- Isolating development environments
- Signing model artifacts
- Enforcing code reviews for AI
- Scanning for vulnerabilities
- Hardening container images
- Monitoring pipeline access
- Controlling model export
- Enabling rollback capability
- Auditing pipeline changes
- Integrating with CI/CD
- Identifying third-party AI usage
- Assessing vendor security posture
- Reviewing data processing terms
- Validating API security controls
- Documenting integration risks
- Enforcing SLAs for AI vendors
- Monitoring vendor incident reports
- Conducting annual reviews
- Managing API key lifecycle
- Tracking subscription renewals
- Aligning vendor controls with ISO 42001
- Escalating vendor issues to legal
- Identifying AI-related incident types
- Classifying model degradation
- Detecting prompt injection attacks
- Responding to bias complaints
- Documenting model drift events
- Escalating to model owners
- Preserving model inputs for review
- Updating runbooks with AI paths
- Simulating AI failure drills
- Measuring MTTR for AI incidents
- Linking incidents to control gaps
- Reporting trends to security team
- Identifying required audit evidence
- Extracting access logs for review
- Generating API usage reports
- Compiling incident response records
- Documenting control testing
- Packaging evidence packages
- Using support ticketing data
- Automating report generation
- Redacting sensitive information
- Validating completeness early
- Scheduling evidence collection
- Responding to auditor queries
- Defining AI control KPIs
- Tracking false positive rates
- Monitoring model performance decay
- Alerting on policy violations
- Reviewing access anomaly reports
- Measuring developer compliance
- Collecting usability feedback
- Reporting on control effectiveness
- Updating monitoring rules
- Integrating with observability tools
- Benchmarking against peer teams
- Optimizing alert thresholds
- Identifying governance champions
- Sharing SoA templates
- Hosting peer reviews
- Documenting lessons learned
- Standardizing control language
- Creating self-serve guides
- Reducing escalations through clarity
- Measuring governance maturity
- Aligning with platform roadmap
- Updating controls quarterly
- Celebrating compliance wins
- Planning next audit cycle
How this maps to your situation
- When a new AI feature enters developer preview
- When audit evidence is requested
- When developers report permission issues
- When third-party AI integration is proposed
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside regular work. Most practitioners finish in 6-8 weeks with full implementation capacity.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program is built specifically for developer support roles implementing ISO 42001. It skips board-level abstractions and focuses on actionable, repeatable control patterns used in actual platform environments.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.