Skip to main content

Problem Investigation in Problem Management

$249.00
How you learn:
Self-paced • Lifetime updates
Toolkit Included:
Includes a practical, ready-to-use toolkit containing implementation templates, worksheets, checklists, and decision-support materials used to accelerate real-world application and reduce setup time.
Your guarantee:
30-day money-back guarantee — no questions asked
When you get access:
Course access is prepared after purchase and delivered via email
Who trusts this:
Trusted by professionals in 160+ countries
Adding to cart… The item has been added

This curriculum spans the full problem management lifecycle, comparable in scope to a multi-workshop operational risk program, addressing the coordination, analysis, and governance challenges seen when organisations systematically address recurring service disruptions across technical and business units.

Module 1: Defining Problem Boundaries and Scope

  • Selecting which recurring incidents to escalate as candidate problems based on business impact, frequency, and resolution cost.
  • Determining whether a problem falls under IT, business operations, or shared responsibility using RACI matrices.
  • Negotiating scope with stakeholders when a problem spans multiple systems or departments with competing priorities.
  • Deciding whether to treat similar symptoms as one broad problem or multiple discrete problems for tracking.
  • Establishing thresholds for problem classification (e.g., major vs. minor) using historical incident data and SLA breach risk.
  • Handling requests to reopen closed problems when new symptoms emerge that may or may not be related.

Module 2: Problem Identification and Prioritization

  • Configuring automated correlation rules in monitoring tools to detect incident clusters suggestive of underlying problems.
  • Adjusting problem prioritization models when business-critical systems undergo change or peak usage periods.
  • Resolving conflicts between service desk urgency and technical team capacity when triaging new problem records.
  • Using Pareto analysis to identify the 20% of problem types causing 80% of service disruptions.
  • Documenting assumptions made during initial problem assessment to support audit and review processes.
  • Integrating risk scoring from security and compliance teams into problem prioritization for vulnerabilities.

Module 3: Root Cause Analysis Execution

  • Selecting between RCA methods (e.g., 5 Whys, Fishbone, Fault Tree) based on problem complexity and available data.
  • Coordinating access to production environments for forensic analysis while maintaining change control policies.
  • Managing resistance from team members who perceive RCA as blame attribution rather than process improvement.
  • Deciding when to involve external vendors in RCA and how to structure data-sharing agreements.
  • Handling incomplete logs or missing monitoring data during RCA and documenting data gaps as risks.
  • Validating root cause hypotheses through controlled replication in non-production environments.

Module 4: Workaround Development and Validation

  • Designing temporary workarounds that minimize user impact without introducing new failure modes.
  • Obtaining approval for workaround implementation when it requires bypassing standard security controls.
  • Documenting workaround steps with sufficient detail for service desk teams to execute consistently.
  • Establishing criteria for when a workaround is no longer effective and must be escalated.
  • Tracking workaround usage duration to prevent long-term reliance instead of permanent fixes.
  • Communicating workaround limitations to users without undermining confidence in service stability.

Module 5: Permanent Fix Planning and Integration

  • Mapping problem resolutions to the change management lifecycle, including CAB scheduling and risk assessment.
  • Coordinating with development teams to align fix timelines with sprint cycles or release windows.
  • Assessing whether a fix requires regression testing across dependent services or integrations.
  • Handling situations where the optimal technical fix conflicts with budget or resource constraints.
  • Defining success metrics for fix validation and determining who owns post-implementation verification.
  • Updating technical documentation and runbooks to reflect changes introduced by the fix.

Module 6: Knowledge Management and Information Flow

  • Authoring knowledge articles from problem records that are actionable for service desk analysts.
  • Enforcing knowledge article review cycles to prevent outdated workarounds from being used.
  • Integrating problem data into self-service portals while controlling access to sensitive system details.
  • Linking known error databases to incident management tools to enable real-time matching.
  • Resolving duplication when multiple teams document the same problem independently.
  • Training二线 support teams to search and apply knowledge base content before escalating.

Module 7: Problem Management Metrics and Reporting

  • Selecting KPIs (e.g., mean time to resolve, problem recurrence rate) that align with business objectives.
  • Designing dashboards that distinguish between open problems, active investigations, and pending changes.
  • Adjusting reporting frequency and depth for different stakeholder groups (e.g., operations vs. executives).
  • Handling discrepancies in problem data due to inconsistent logging practices across teams.
  • Using trend analysis to justify investment in proactive problem identification initiatives.
  • Conducting post-mortems on major problems to refine metrics and improve future reporting accuracy.

Module 8: Governance and Continuous Improvement

  • Establishing problem review boards with rotating membership to avoid siloed decision-making.
  • Updating problem management policies in response to audit findings or regulatory changes.
  • Enforcing problem closure criteria to prevent indefinite status in the tracking system.
  • Integrating problem data into capacity and availability planning processes.
  • Measuring the effectiveness of problem prevention initiatives over time using control groups.
  • Aligning problem management practices with ITIL, COBIT, or other frameworks without over-documenting.