Are you struggling to make effective procurement decisions for your business? Do you often find yourself overwhelmed with the sheer number of factors to consider and unsure of the best course of action? Look no further, because our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base is here to help.
Our comprehensive dataset contains 1533 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and real-life examples of successful procurement decision making and Chief Procurement Officer practices.
We understand that time is of the essence in the business world, which is why our dataset also provides urgent and scoped questions to guide you through the decision-making process quickly and efficiently.
What sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our product′s focus on professionals and businesses.
We designed this dataset specifically for those who are responsible for making procurement decisions and for companies looking to improve their procurement processes.
Our product is user-friendly and cost-effective, making it a viable alternative to expensive consulting services.
Don′t waste any more time and resources on trial and error methods or costly consultations.
Our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base has been meticulously researched and curated to provide you with everything you need to make informed and impactful decisions for your business.
With our product, you can cut costs, save time, and ultimately increase your company′s bottom line.
Our dataset covers a wide range of procurement topics, including the latest trends, best practices, and real-world case studies.
You′ll have access to detailed product specifications and overviews, allowing you to quickly find the information you need.
Our dataset also includes data on related products, so you can compare and choose the best fit for your specific needs.
Some of the key benefits of our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base include:- Streamlined decision-making process- Access to expert insights and best practices- Cost-effective alternative to consulting services- Comprehensive coverage of procurement topics - Real-life examples and case studies for reference - User-friendly and easy to navigateInvesting in our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base is an investment in the success of your business.
Don′t miss out on this valuable resource that can help you make strategic and effective procurement decisions.
Try it now and see the positive impact it can have on your company′s procurement processes.
Does your organization have procedures to ensure that the procurement function is involved in making buying decisions? What factors does your organization consider when making a decision to respond to procurement for a project? What challenges does your organization face in providing data to support decision making?
Procurement Decision Making
Procurement decision making involves ensuring that the procurement function is involved in making buying decisions within an organization.
1. Implement standardized procurement procedures to involve Chief Procurement Officer in decision making. - ensures expertise and compliance.
2. Develop cross-functional teams with representation from procurement to make informed buying decisions. - enables collaboration and thorough evaluation.
3. Establish clear approval processes for purchases to involve Chief Procurement Officer at appropriate stages. - promotes oversight and risk mitigation.
4. Introduce procurement training for employees involved in purchasing decisions to increase understanding and utilization of the procurement function. - improves efficiency and effectiveness.
5. Utilize procurement data and analytics to inform decision making and identify opportunities for cost savings and process improvement. - enables strategic decision making and informed negotiations.
6. Regularly evaluate and update supplier evaluation criteria in collaboration with procurement. - ensures supplier selection aligns with organization′s goals and objectives.
7. Implement a central purchasing system with automated approvals to streamline the procurement process and involve Chief Procurement Officer in real-time. - improves transparency and reduces processing time.
8. Encourage communication and transparency between departments and procurement to ensure that procurement is involved in all relevant buying decisions. - fosters trust and collaboration.
9. Conduct regular internal audits of purchasing activities to ensure compliance with procurement policies and procedures. - identifies and addresses any potential gaps or areas for improvement.
10. Establish a clear code of conduct and ethical standards for purchasing decisions, with the involvement of Chief Procurement Officer. - promotes integrity and ethical behavior in purchasing activities.
CONTROL QUESTION: Does the organization have procedures to ensure that the procurement function is involved in making buying decisions?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2031, our organization will have successfully implemented a fully integrated and centralized procurement decision-making process, where the procurement function is considered an essential part of all buying decisions. This will include the involvement of procurement professionals at all levels, from the initial identification of purchasing needs to the final selection of suppliers.
Our goal is to establish a culture that recognizes the importance of strategic sourcing and procurement in driving business success. We aim to have robust systems and processes in place that enable data-driven and fact-based decision-making, with a focus on value creation and cost optimization.
We envision a procurement function that is empowered and equipped with advanced tools and technologies to analyze market trends and supplier performance, in order to make proactive and informed buying decisions. Our ultimate goal is to achieve measurable improvements in supply chain efficiency, cost savings, and risk mitigation through our procurement decision-making processes.
This transformation will require significant investment in training, talent development, and technology infrastructure. We will also collaborate closely with key stakeholders across the organization, including budget owners, legal counsel, and finance teams, to ensure alignment and buy-in for our procurement decision-making initiatives.
In 10 years, our organization will be known for its best-in-class procurement decision-making capabilities, setting us apart as a leader in strategic sourcing and procurement excellence.
"Compared to other recommendation solutions, this dataset was incredibly affordable. The value I`ve received far outweighs the cost."
Introduction
Procurement decision making is a crucial aspect of any organization′s operations, as it directly impacts the overall financial health and competitiveness of the organization. In today′s increasingly dynamic business landscape, organizations are facing ever-evolving challenges when it comes to efficiently managing their procurement processes. According to a recent survey conducted by Deloitte, 89% of companies view strategic procurement as an essential factor in driving business growth and profitability (Deloitte, 2020). However, while many organizations recognize its significance, they struggle to effectively implement procurement decision-making processes that ensure optimal outcomes.
The client, ABC Corporation, is a global manufacturing company with operations spread across different regions. The organization has faced numerous challenges in managing its procurement decisions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes, including increased costs, delayed timelines, and poor quality of products and services. As part of a consulting engagement, our team was tasked with evaluating ABC Corporation′s procurement decision-making processes to determine if the organization had procedures in place to ensure that procurement was involved in buying decisions.
Consulting Methodology
To conduct a comprehensive analysis, our consulting team employed a combination of research methods, including document review, interviews with key stakeholders, and benchmarking against best practices and industry standards. The initial document review involved examining the organization′s procurement policies and procedures, supplier contracts, and historical data related to procurement decisions. Interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, including senior management, procurement professionals, and end-users, to understand their perspectives on the procurement decision-making process. Benchmarking was done against leading organizations in the manufacturing industry to identify gaps in the client′s processes and highlight potential areas for improvement.
Finding and Recommendations
Based on our analysis, we identified several key findings that suggested the organization did not have robust processes in place to ensure procurement involvement in purchasing decisions. One of the main issues we identified was the lack of a central procurement function. ABC Corporation had an ad-hoc approach to procurement, with departments making their purchasing decisions without involving the procurement department. This resulted in fragmented and inconsistent processes, leading to missed opportunities for cost savings and reduced bargaining power with suppliers.
Moreover, the organization did not have a standardized procurement process, resulting in varying levels of involvement from the procurement department in different purchases. Many of the stakeholders we interviewed highlighted the absence of clear policies and procedures, leading to confusion and delays in decision-making. These findings suggested a lack of a strategic approach to procurement, which was further compounded by a decentralized structure, where individual departments had autonomy in their procurement decisions.
To address these issues, our team recommended several changes to the client′s procurement decision-making processes. Our primary recommendation was the establishment of a centralized procurement function that would oversee all procurement activities across the organization. This centralization would help streamline processes, ensure consistency in decision-making, and provide a more holistic view of procurement activities, enabling the organization to negotiate better deals with suppliers. We also recommended the adoption of a standardized procurement process, supported by clear policies and procedures that would ensure the involvement of procurement in all purchases.
Deliverables
Our consulting team provided the following deliverables to support the recommended changes:
1. Procurement policy and procedures: We developed a detailed procurement policy and procedures manual, outlining the roles and responsibilities of the procurement department and other stakeholders in the procurement process. The manual also provided guidance on the steps to be followed for various types of purchases, such as direct and indirect materials, services, and capital equipment.
2. Supplier evaluation framework: We proposed a supplier evaluation framework to help the organization assess potential suppliers′ capabilities and fit to its business needs. The framework incorporated best practices such as assessing supplier financial stability, quality certifications, and past performance with other clients.
3. Procurement training program: To ensure widespread adoption of the new policies and procedures, we developed a training program for all stakeholders involved in the procurement process. The training covered topics such as contract management, negotiation skills, and risk management.
4. Procurement software implementation: As part of our recommendations, we suggested the implementation of a procurement software solution to automate and streamline the procurement processes. The software would allow for better data management and analysis, enabling the procurement department to make more informed decisions.
Implementation Challenges
The primary challenge faced in implementing these changes was resistance to change from stakeholders, especially from departments that had independent decision-making authority. The cultural shift towards centralization and a standardized process required significant buy-in from all stakeholders to be successful. To overcome this challenge, our team developed a change management plan that focused on effective communication and engagement with all parties involved. Regular progress updates and transparent communication helped alleviate fears and build trust in the new procurement processes.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To measure the success of the new procurement decision-making processes, we identified the following KPIs for ABC Corporation:
1. Cost savings: A key objective of the changes was to reduce costs through better bargaining power and more optimal buying decisions. A baseline of current procurement costs was established, and future savings were measured against it.
2. Supplier performance: We recommended regularly tracking and evaluating supplier performance against the agreed-upon criteria. This would help identify areas for improvement and ensure that the organization was working with reliable and efficient suppliers.
3. Cycle time: We proposed measuring the time taken to complete the procurement process for different types of purchases, and identifying bottlenecks and areas for improvement.
Management Considerations
To ensure the sustainability of the changes, our team highlighted the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the procurement decision-making processes. We recommended regular audits to assess compliance with policies and procedures and to identify any potential areas for improvement. Additionally, continuous stakeholder engagement was deemed vital to ensure that the implementation of the new processes remained aligned with the organization′s overall objectives.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the analysis highlighted significant gaps in the client′s procurement decision-making processes. The lack of centralized procurement and standardized procedures resulted in inconsistent decision-making and missed opportunities for cost savings. Our recommendations focused on establishing a centralized procurement function and implementing a standardized process supported by appropriate policies and procedures. The changes were aimed at ensuring procurement involvement in all purchases, leading to better cost management and supplier performance. With the proper implementation and monitoring, the proposed changes would enable ABC Corporation to optimize its procurement decisions and support its overall business objectives.
Our comprehensive dataset contains 1533 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and real-life examples of successful procurement decision making and Chief Procurement Officer practices.
We understand that time is of the essence in the business world, which is why our dataset also provides urgent and scoped questions to guide you through the decision-making process quickly and efficiently.
What sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our product′s focus on professionals and businesses.
We designed this dataset specifically for those who are responsible for making procurement decisions and for companies looking to improve their procurement processes.
Our product is user-friendly and cost-effective, making it a viable alternative to expensive consulting services.
Don′t waste any more time and resources on trial and error methods or costly consultations.
Our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base has been meticulously researched and curated to provide you with everything you need to make informed and impactful decisions for your business.
With our product, you can cut costs, save time, and ultimately increase your company′s bottom line.
Our dataset covers a wide range of procurement topics, including the latest trends, best practices, and real-world case studies.
You′ll have access to detailed product specifications and overviews, allowing you to quickly find the information you need.
Our dataset also includes data on related products, so you can compare and choose the best fit for your specific needs.
Some of the key benefits of our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base include:- Streamlined decision-making process- Access to expert insights and best practices- Cost-effective alternative to consulting services- Comprehensive coverage of procurement topics - Real-life examples and case studies for reference - User-friendly and easy to navigateInvesting in our Procurement Decision Making and Chief Procurement Officer Knowledge Base is an investment in the success of your business.
Don′t miss out on this valuable resource that can help you make strategic and effective procurement decisions.
Try it now and see the positive impact it can have on your company′s procurement processes.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1533 prioritized Procurement Decision Making requirements. - Extensive coverage of 114 Procurement Decision Making topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 114 Procurement Decision Making step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 114 Procurement Decision Making case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Cost Control, Market Trends, Procurement Policies, Supplier Integration, Strategic Partnerships, Procurement Contract Compliance, Supplier Collaboration Tools, Supplier Performance Tracking, Supplier Diversification, Supplier Performance Metrics, Procurement Supplier Selection, Cost Reduction, RFP Management, Risk Margins, Supplier Collaboration, Responsive Design, Data Breaches, Procurement Optimization, Supplier Performance Analysis, Contract Negotiations, Supplier Negotiations, Supplier Diversity, Supplier Risk Analysis, Supplier Onboarding, Procurement Data Analysis, Procurement Quality Control, Total Cost Of Ownership, Procurement Monitoring, Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Performance Evaluation, Inventory Control, Procurement Transparency, Spend Management, Vendor Management, Supplier Dispute Management, Contract Negotiation Process, Inventory Management, Supplier Dispute Resolution, Material Procurement, Sustainable Design, Procurement Strategy, Supplier Selection, Supplier Risk Mitigation, Supplier Cost Reduction, Procurement Contract Management, Risk Management, Supplier Communication Strategies, Procurement Planning, Spend Visibility, Supplier Quality Assurance, Inventory Optimization, Procurement Organization, Supplier Audits, Performance Metrics, Indirect Procurement, Cost Savings, Procurement Negotiations, Demand Management, Negotiation Skills, Contract Compliance, Procurement Process Improvement, Procurement Regulations, Supplier Risk Assessment, Supplier Communication, Procurement Best Practices, Stakeholder Management, Supplier Management Software, Supplier Risk Management, Supplier Relationships, Compliance Issues, Negotiation Tactics, Demand Forecasting, Procurement Governance, Supplier Evaluation, Contract Management, Technology Integration, Procure Software, Category Management, Chief Financial Officer, Procurement Process, Procurement Decision Making, Contract Management Software, Procurement Policy, Procurement Analytics, Budget Planning, Procurement Technology, Supplier Performance Improvement, Supplier Qualification, RFP Process, Supplier Performance, Supplier Relationship Management, Supplier Scorecards, Sustainable Sourcing, Value Analysis, Chief Investment Officer, Supplier Development, Procurement Transformation, Financial Stewardship, Chief Procurement Officer, Systems Review, Supplier Performance Benchmarks, Chief Technology Officer, Growth and Innovation, Supply Chain Optimization, Performance Reviews, Supplier Contracts Management, Procurement Compliance, Outsourcing Strategies, Purchasing Processes, Supplier Data Management, Spend Analysis, Supplier Contracts, Supplier Pricing, Global Sourcing
Procurement Decision Making Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Procurement Decision Making
Procurement decision making involves ensuring that the procurement function is involved in making buying decisions within an organization.
1. Implement standardized procurement procedures to involve Chief Procurement Officer in decision making. - ensures expertise and compliance.
2. Develop cross-functional teams with representation from procurement to make informed buying decisions. - enables collaboration and thorough evaluation.
3. Establish clear approval processes for purchases to involve Chief Procurement Officer at appropriate stages. - promotes oversight and risk mitigation.
4. Introduce procurement training for employees involved in purchasing decisions to increase understanding and utilization of the procurement function. - improves efficiency and effectiveness.
5. Utilize procurement data and analytics to inform decision making and identify opportunities for cost savings and process improvement. - enables strategic decision making and informed negotiations.
6. Regularly evaluate and update supplier evaluation criteria in collaboration with procurement. - ensures supplier selection aligns with organization′s goals and objectives.
7. Implement a central purchasing system with automated approvals to streamline the procurement process and involve Chief Procurement Officer in real-time. - improves transparency and reduces processing time.
8. Encourage communication and transparency between departments and procurement to ensure that procurement is involved in all relevant buying decisions. - fosters trust and collaboration.
9. Conduct regular internal audits of purchasing activities to ensure compliance with procurement policies and procedures. - identifies and addresses any potential gaps or areas for improvement.
10. Establish a clear code of conduct and ethical standards for purchasing decisions, with the involvement of Chief Procurement Officer. - promotes integrity and ethical behavior in purchasing activities.
CONTROL QUESTION: Does the organization have procedures to ensure that the procurement function is involved in making buying decisions?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2031, our organization will have successfully implemented a fully integrated and centralized procurement decision-making process, where the procurement function is considered an essential part of all buying decisions. This will include the involvement of procurement professionals at all levels, from the initial identification of purchasing needs to the final selection of suppliers.
Our goal is to establish a culture that recognizes the importance of strategic sourcing and procurement in driving business success. We aim to have robust systems and processes in place that enable data-driven and fact-based decision-making, with a focus on value creation and cost optimization.
We envision a procurement function that is empowered and equipped with advanced tools and technologies to analyze market trends and supplier performance, in order to make proactive and informed buying decisions. Our ultimate goal is to achieve measurable improvements in supply chain efficiency, cost savings, and risk mitigation through our procurement decision-making processes.
This transformation will require significant investment in training, talent development, and technology infrastructure. We will also collaborate closely with key stakeholders across the organization, including budget owners, legal counsel, and finance teams, to ensure alignment and buy-in for our procurement decision-making initiatives.
In 10 years, our organization will be known for its best-in-class procurement decision-making capabilities, setting us apart as a leader in strategic sourcing and procurement excellence.
Customer Testimonials:
"Compared to other recommendation solutions, this dataset was incredibly affordable. The value I`ve received far outweighs the cost."
"The prioritized recommendations in this dataset have added immense value to my work. The data is well-organized, and the insights provided have been instrumental in guiding my decisions. Impressive!"
"This dataset has been a game-changer for my business! The prioritized recommendations are spot-on, and I`ve seen a significant improvement in my conversion rates since I started using them."
Procurement Decision Making Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction
Procurement decision making is a crucial aspect of any organization′s operations, as it directly impacts the overall financial health and competitiveness of the organization. In today′s increasingly dynamic business landscape, organizations are facing ever-evolving challenges when it comes to efficiently managing their procurement processes. According to a recent survey conducted by Deloitte, 89% of companies view strategic procurement as an essential factor in driving business growth and profitability (Deloitte, 2020). However, while many organizations recognize its significance, they struggle to effectively implement procurement decision-making processes that ensure optimal outcomes.
The client, ABC Corporation, is a global manufacturing company with operations spread across different regions. The organization has faced numerous challenges in managing its procurement decisions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes, including increased costs, delayed timelines, and poor quality of products and services. As part of a consulting engagement, our team was tasked with evaluating ABC Corporation′s procurement decision-making processes to determine if the organization had procedures in place to ensure that procurement was involved in buying decisions.
Consulting Methodology
To conduct a comprehensive analysis, our consulting team employed a combination of research methods, including document review, interviews with key stakeholders, and benchmarking against best practices and industry standards. The initial document review involved examining the organization′s procurement policies and procedures, supplier contracts, and historical data related to procurement decisions. Interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, including senior management, procurement professionals, and end-users, to understand their perspectives on the procurement decision-making process. Benchmarking was done against leading organizations in the manufacturing industry to identify gaps in the client′s processes and highlight potential areas for improvement.
Finding and Recommendations
Based on our analysis, we identified several key findings that suggested the organization did not have robust processes in place to ensure procurement involvement in purchasing decisions. One of the main issues we identified was the lack of a central procurement function. ABC Corporation had an ad-hoc approach to procurement, with departments making their purchasing decisions without involving the procurement department. This resulted in fragmented and inconsistent processes, leading to missed opportunities for cost savings and reduced bargaining power with suppliers.
Moreover, the organization did not have a standardized procurement process, resulting in varying levels of involvement from the procurement department in different purchases. Many of the stakeholders we interviewed highlighted the absence of clear policies and procedures, leading to confusion and delays in decision-making. These findings suggested a lack of a strategic approach to procurement, which was further compounded by a decentralized structure, where individual departments had autonomy in their procurement decisions.
To address these issues, our team recommended several changes to the client′s procurement decision-making processes. Our primary recommendation was the establishment of a centralized procurement function that would oversee all procurement activities across the organization. This centralization would help streamline processes, ensure consistency in decision-making, and provide a more holistic view of procurement activities, enabling the organization to negotiate better deals with suppliers. We also recommended the adoption of a standardized procurement process, supported by clear policies and procedures that would ensure the involvement of procurement in all purchases.
Deliverables
Our consulting team provided the following deliverables to support the recommended changes:
1. Procurement policy and procedures: We developed a detailed procurement policy and procedures manual, outlining the roles and responsibilities of the procurement department and other stakeholders in the procurement process. The manual also provided guidance on the steps to be followed for various types of purchases, such as direct and indirect materials, services, and capital equipment.
2. Supplier evaluation framework: We proposed a supplier evaluation framework to help the organization assess potential suppliers′ capabilities and fit to its business needs. The framework incorporated best practices such as assessing supplier financial stability, quality certifications, and past performance with other clients.
3. Procurement training program: To ensure widespread adoption of the new policies and procedures, we developed a training program for all stakeholders involved in the procurement process. The training covered topics such as contract management, negotiation skills, and risk management.
4. Procurement software implementation: As part of our recommendations, we suggested the implementation of a procurement software solution to automate and streamline the procurement processes. The software would allow for better data management and analysis, enabling the procurement department to make more informed decisions.
Implementation Challenges
The primary challenge faced in implementing these changes was resistance to change from stakeholders, especially from departments that had independent decision-making authority. The cultural shift towards centralization and a standardized process required significant buy-in from all stakeholders to be successful. To overcome this challenge, our team developed a change management plan that focused on effective communication and engagement with all parties involved. Regular progress updates and transparent communication helped alleviate fears and build trust in the new procurement processes.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To measure the success of the new procurement decision-making processes, we identified the following KPIs for ABC Corporation:
1. Cost savings: A key objective of the changes was to reduce costs through better bargaining power and more optimal buying decisions. A baseline of current procurement costs was established, and future savings were measured against it.
2. Supplier performance: We recommended regularly tracking and evaluating supplier performance against the agreed-upon criteria. This would help identify areas for improvement and ensure that the organization was working with reliable and efficient suppliers.
3. Cycle time: We proposed measuring the time taken to complete the procurement process for different types of purchases, and identifying bottlenecks and areas for improvement.
Management Considerations
To ensure the sustainability of the changes, our team highlighted the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the procurement decision-making processes. We recommended regular audits to assess compliance with policies and procedures and to identify any potential areas for improvement. Additionally, continuous stakeholder engagement was deemed vital to ensure that the implementation of the new processes remained aligned with the organization′s overall objectives.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the analysis highlighted significant gaps in the client′s procurement decision-making processes. The lack of centralized procurement and standardized procedures resulted in inconsistent decision-making and missed opportunities for cost savings. Our recommendations focused on establishing a centralized procurement function and implementing a standardized process supported by appropriate policies and procedures. The changes were aimed at ensuring procurement involvement in all purchases, leading to better cost management and supplier performance. With the proper implementation and monitoring, the proposed changes would enable ABC Corporation to optimize its procurement decisions and support its overall business objectives.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
