A tailored course, built for your situation
Reference of choice on cross-functional AI governance calls
Become the internal authority on AI Act alignment for engineering and policy teams
Who this is for
Senior software engineer or technical IC working at a data and AI platform company, contributing to or shaping AI governance frameworks in response to emerging regulation.
Who this is not for
Individuals seeking entry-level compliance training or non-technical overviews of AI policy.
What you walk away with
- Recognized source of truth for AI Act interpretation within engineering and cross-functional teams
- Documented decision patterns for AI risk categorization and mitigation aligned to AI Act requirements
- Templates and playbooks that accelerate internal reviews and external audits
- Credibility to lead AI governance working sessions with product, legal, and risk stakeholders
- Proven ability to translate high-level AI Act mandates into working system controls
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Purpose of the AI Act
- Definition of an AI system under EU law
- High-risk AI use cases listed in Annex III
- General-purpose AI provisions
- Role of upstream model providers
- Obligations for deployers vs developers
- Geographic reach of the regulation
- Interaction with national laws
- Registration requirements for high-risk systems
- Timeline for compliance deadlines
- Exemptions for research and non-production use
- How enforcement actions are initiated
- Data provenance requirements
- Bias assessment in training data
- Representativeness of data sets
- Documentation of data preprocessing
- Versioning of training data
- Human oversight in data labeling
- Data retention policies
- Right to access training data
- Audit trail for data changes
- Third-party data sourcing risks
- Geolocation data handling
- Synthetic data disclosure rules
- Minimum contents of technical documentation
- System architecture diagrams for audit
- Version control integration
- Logging of model inputs and outputs
- Model performance thresholds
- Change management for updates
- Human-in-the-loop logging
- Incident reporting workflows
- Model card integration
- System interface documentation
- Security logging for inference APIs
- Retention period for system logs
- Risk identification framework
- Hazard classification methodology
- Risk estimation vs risk evaluation
- Continuous risk monitoring
- Fallback plans for system failure
- User notification protocols
- Escalation paths for unresolved risks
- Third-party risk assessment
- Security threat modeling
- Bias mitigation across lifecycle
- Post-deployment risk tracking
- Risk documentation for audits
- Definition of human oversight
- Roles for human reviewers
- Timing of intervention points
- Training for human operators
- Overrides and escalation paths
- Auditability of human decisions
- Feedback loop integration
- Oversight in automated decision chains
- Interfaces for human control
- Limits of human-in-the-loop
- Scalability of oversight design
- Oversight documentation requirements
- Performance metrics selection
- Stress testing design
- Adversarial attack resistance
- Model drift detection
- Failure mode analysis
- Redundancy planning
- Input validation rules
- Model explainability integration
- Secure deployment pipelines
- Model integrity verification
- Monitoring under distribution shift
- Incident response for model compromise
- User notification requirements
- Nature of AI decision explanation
- Machine-readable disclosures
- Instructions for use content
- Public register submission process
- Labeling of AI-generated content
- Right to know when interacting with AI
- Clarity vs legal compliance balance
- Multilingual disclosure needs
- Accessibility standards
- Dynamic updates to disclosures
- Third-party content liability
- Internal conformity process
- Role of quality management systems
- Testing against specifications
- Audit trail preparation
- Use of harmonized standards
- Notified body involvement
- Declaration of conformity
- Technical file assembly
- Ongoing compliance monitoring
- Post-market surveillance
- Substantial modification assessment
- Record retention obligations
- Obligations for model providers
- Downstream risk communication
- API documentation standards
- Model card requirements
- Terms of use for AI services
- Liability allocation in contracts
- Compliance warranties
- Model version support lifecycle
- Security update obligations
- Reseller compliance tracking
- Vendor audit rights
- Open source model compliance
- AI governance committee structure
- Cross-team escalation paths
- Policy ownership definitions
- Compliance monitoring cadence
- Internal audit protocols
- External auditor preparation
- Regulator engagement strategy
- Incident reporting workflows
- Training for new hires
- Lessons learned integration
- Compliance dashboard design
- Regulatory change tracking
- Mapping AI Act to SOC 2 controls
- Overlap with ISO 27001 domains
- AI and data protection impact assessments
- GDPR and AI interaction
- NIST AI RMF integration
- CIS Controls adaptation
- Privacy by design principles
- Model risk management alignment
- Enterprise risk framework integration
- Control automation strategies
- Audit trail consolidation
- Unified compliance reporting
- UK AI regulation roadmap
- US federal AI executive order alignment
- Canadian AIDA comparison
- Japan’s JSIA guidelines
- South Korea AI Act
- China’s algorithm registration
- Singapore’s Model AI Governance Framework
- OECD AI Principles adoption
- Cross-border compliance conflicts
- Industry-specific rules in healthcare and finance
- Standards body developments
- Scenario planning for regulatory change
How this maps to your situation
- When launching a new AI product
- During internal audit prep cycles
- Before external regulator engagement
- When onboarding third-party AI vendors
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed for asynchronous learning around active engineering work.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or high-level policy summaries, this course delivers actionable, code-adjacent compliance patterns tailored to senior engineers shaping AI systems in regulated environments.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.