A focused course, tailored for you
Regulatory Governance Framework Design for Financial Services
Build the multi-regulator governance structure that holds up under APRA, ASIC, and AUSTRAC examination, not just on paper.
The attestation pack is due to the board and two business lines still have not completed their self-assessments. The obligation register maps the latest CPS 230 changes across policies, but management sign-off is missing at the right level. When the prudential regulator reviews the governance framework, that is the first thing they look for.
Includes a hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access, generated for your specific situation.
Why this course
Regulatory Governance Managers at major financial groups carry a specific accountability: the governance framework must satisfy multiple regulators simultaneously, APRA prudential standards, ASIC conduct obligations, AUSTRAC AML/CTF requirements, each with different documentation expectations and attestation cycles. The real problem is not writing the policies. It is building a governance architecture where obligation mapping, policy hierarchy, management accountability, and attestation are coherent enough to survive regulator examination and board scrutiny at the same time. Most governance frameworks are built reactively, adding layers after each regulatory update, until the structure becomes inconsistent and the attestation process collapses under its own weight.
What you walk away with
- Design a governance framework architecture that maps APRA CPS 230, ASIC conduct obligations, and AUSTRAC AML/CTF requirements to a single coherent policy hierarchy.
- Build an obligation register that shows regulators which policies satisfy which regulatory requirements, with version control and change-trigger documentation.
- Implement a management attestation cycle that business lines actually complete, with escalation paths and documented sign-off at the correct accountability level.
- Produce a board governance pack that presents multi-regulator obligation status clearly, without conflating prudential, conduct, and financial crime requirements.
- Respond to a regulatory information request with a governance framework that is internally consistent and auditable, not assembled from scattered documents after the request arrives.
The 12 modules
How this addresses your situation
Specific modules that map to what you said you are dealing with.
What you get with this course
- 12 written modules in the Art of Service learning environment, self-paced
- Obligation register template with APRA, ASIC, and AUSTRAC mapping columns
- Policy hierarchy and version control template
- Management attestation questionnaire template with escalation rules
- Board governance reporting template with obligation heat map
- Regulatory change management process documentation template
- Hand-built implementation playbook tailored to regulatory governance roles in financial services
What you will have in hand by Day 1, Week 1, Month 1
Course access and the hand-built implementation playbook are both delivered within 24 hours of purchase.
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Before and after
Governance framework exists as a set of documents that satisfy individual regulatory requirements in isolation. Attestation cycles are incomplete. When a regulator visits, the team assembles evidence under time pressure, discovers inconsistencies between policy layers, and cannot demonstrate that governance is genuinely embedded.
Governance framework is architecturally coherent across APRA, ASIC, and AUSTRAC obligations. Obligation register is current, owned, and change-triggered. Attestation cycle runs on schedule with documented sign-off. Regulatory examination preparation takes days, not weeks, because the evidence is already structured.
What happens if you do not address this
A governance framework that looks complete on the surface but cannot demonstrate embedded management accountability and coherent multi-regulator obligation mapping is a supervisory risk. APRA's thematic reviews and ASIC surveillances have become more documentation-intensive. A framework that requires reactive assembly when a regulator visits is evidence of the problem the regulator is looking for.
Who it is for
Regulatory governance managers, compliance directors, and senior governance professionals at Australian and international financial groups who own the design and maintenance of multi-regulator governance frameworks. Typically accountable to the Chief Compliance Officer or Chief Risk Officer, responsible for translating APRA prudential standards, ASIC regulatory expectations, and AUSTRAC obligations into an internal governance structure that business lines can attest against and regulators can examine.
How it arrives
Text-based course in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every module, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment. Approximately 8-10 hours across the 12 modules at your own pace. Templates are ready to adapt immediately.
Why $199 is the right number
Governance consultants charge $15,000-$50,000 for a framework review and typically deliver a report rather than a working implementation. Regulatory training programs cover what the regulations say, not how to build the internal governance structure. This course teaches the build, with templates, so the work happens inside your organisation rather than being handed to an external firm.
FAQ
30-day money-back guarantee. If after a week of working through the materials this is not what you needed, reply to the receipt email and a full refund is processed. No questions, no forms.
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.