A tailored course, built for your situation
Governance for Research Integrity in Academic Medicine
Ensure compliance, protect funding, and uphold ethical standards in medical research
The situation this course is for
Academic medical researchers face mounting pressure to maintain integrity across studies, publications, and grant reporting. Ambiguous oversight, shifting regulations, and complex collaboration models increase exposure to retractions, audit findings, and compliance gaps. Without a structured governance approach, even minor oversights can escalate into institutional liabilities.
Who this is for
Research-focused academic professional operating at the intersection of medicine, compliance, and scholarly output
Who this is not for
Administrative staff without research oversight, clinical-only practitioners, or those not involved in publication or grant-funded work
What you walk away with
- Build a defensible governance framework for research integrity
- Align with federal and institutional compliance requirements
- Strengthen peer review and publication oversight
- Implement audit-ready documentation practices
- Protect grant funding through proactive risk controls
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining research integrity
- Core ethical principles
- Federal policy frameworks
- Institutional oversight roles
- Authorship and attribution
- Data ownership rules
- Conflict of interest disclosure
- Whistleblower protections
- Research misconduct types
- Prevention vs detection
- Institutional review boards
- Ethics training requirements
- Federal grant lifecycle
- NIH compliance rules
- NSF reporting standards
- Budget deviation policies
- Subaward oversight
- Progress reporting
- Data sharing mandates
- Audit readiness checklist
- Closeout procedures
- Time and effort reporting
- Cost allowability rules
- Non-compliance penalties
- Data classification levels
- HIPAA research provisions
- Secure storage options
- Access control policies
- Data use agreements
- Retention schedules
- De-identification methods
- Cloud storage compliance
- International data transfer
- Data ownership rules
- Metadata documentation
- Data audit trails
- Authorship criteria
- ICMJE guidelines
- Image integrity checks
- Duplicate submission risks
- Plagiarism detection tools
- Correction and retraction
- Transparency standards
- Peer review ethics
- Conflict of interest
- Journal selection
- Open access compliance
- Preprint policies
- MOU vs contract
- Data sharing terms
- IP ownership rules
- Publication rights
- Dispute resolution
- Liability clauses
- Confidentiality terms
- Funding allocation
- Performance metrics
- Exit strategies
- Compliance alignment
- Lead institution roles
- Common Rule overview
- Informed consent elements
- Vulnerable populations
- Waiver of consent
- Adverse event reporting
- Continuing review
- Expedited review paths
- Consent documentation
- Language access
- Assent procedures
- IRB submission prep
- Post-approval monitoring
- FFP definitions
- Red flags of misconduct
- Reporting pathways
- Whistleblower protection
- Inquiry vs investigation
- Evidence preservation
- Interview protocols
- Finding classifications
- Corrective actions
- Retraction process
- Training requirements
- Culture of integrity
- Proposal review checklist
- Biosketch formatting
- Budget justification
- Facilities description
- Human subjects section
- Data management plan
- Conflict of interest
- Prior approval items
- Subcontract disclosures
- Responsible conduct
- Peer review simulation
- Submission readiness
- Cost allowability
- Effort reporting
- Salary cap rules
- No-cost extensions
- Carryforward requests
- Budget reallocation
- Audit documentation
- Financial reporting
- Closeout requirements
- Time and effort
- Indirect cost tracking
- Compliance monitoring
- Mentorship best practices
- Trainee onboarding
- RCR training plans
- Lab meeting structure
- Data ownership
- Authorship discussions
- Career development
- Progress monitoring
- Ethics discussions
- Supervision frequency
- Training documentation
- Exit interviews
- Audit types
- Document organization
- Response protocols
- Corrective action plans
- Findings classification
- Root cause analysis
- Follow-up reviews
- Internal audit prep
- External audit prep
- Document retention
- Staff training
- Post-audit reporting
- Leadership modeling
- Recognition programs
- Integrity metrics
- Team discussions
- Case study reviews
- Policy updates
- Feedback mechanisms
- Bias mitigation
- Equity in authorship
- Open science
- Whistleblower support
- Continuous improvement
How this maps to your situation
- Researcher preparing for NIH audit
- Team lead drafting multi-institutional agreement
- Mentor overseeing junior researchers
- Principal investigator managing post-award compliance
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3-4 hours per module, designed for busy professionals to complete at their own pace over 8-12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program is tailored to academic medical research governance, addressing real-world scenarios in publication, funding, data, and collaboration that off-the-shelf training misses.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.