A tailored course, built for your situation
Sharper AI Governance Outputs Under the AI Act
Deliver more accurate, defensible, and polished governance artefacts the first time, aligned to the EU AI Act.
The situation this course is for
Even skilled practitioners waste time revising AI governance outputs due to unclear thresholds, incomplete evidence trails, or misaligned risk categorisations under emerging rules like the AI Act. The cost isn’t just rework, it’s credibility when regulators or internal stakeholders push back.
Who this is for
Senior technical practitioner in data, AI, or infrastructure roles leading governance implementation without formal policy authority, focused on producing credible, auditable, and timely outputs under frameworks like the AI Act.
Who this is not for
People looking for high-level AI ethics overviews or non-technical policy summaries. This is for doers who ship real governance artefacts , risk matrices, conformity assessments, technical documentation , under regulatory scrutiny.
What you walk away with
- Produce AI governance documentation that passes internal review with fewer revisions
- Apply the AI Act’s risk classification criteria confidently and consistently
- Build evidence trails that are complete and defensible from first submission
- Structure technical documentation that meets conformity assessment requirements
- Reduce time spent reconciling policy gaps during audit prep cycles
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Scope and applicability of the AI Act
- Definition of an AI system under EU law
- High-risk use case categories
- Prohibited AI practices
- Obligations by actor type
- Timeline for enforcement
- Alignment with existing digital regulations
- Role of notified bodies
- Market surveillance mechanisms
- Penalties and compliance thresholds
- Interaction with national laws
- Future amendments and expansion
- Determining high-risk by function
- Use of safety component analysis
- Assessing real-time biometrics
- Evaluating remote identification
- Employment decision systems
- Education profiling tools
- Essential services access
- Law enforcement exceptions
- Documentation for borderline cases
- Internal appeals process design
- Cross-functional alignment on risk
- Versioning decisions over time
- Training data provenance
- Data quality assurance steps
- Recordkeeping for logging
- Human oversight mechanisms
- Accuracy monitoring logs
- Bias mitigation reports
- Post-deployment performance metrics
- Change control documentation
- Version history tracking
- Incident response records
- Third-party component inventories
- Compliance self-audits
- System overview and purpose
- Intended use documentation
- Risk management system design
- Data pipeline descriptions
- Model architecture summary
- Performance metrics reported
- Robustness testing results
- Cybersecurity protections
- Human-in-the-loop design
- User information requirements
- Conformity assessment checklist
- Living documentation updates
- Internal vs external conformity paths
- Choosing a notified body
- Application package contents
- Pre-audit gap analysis
- Corrective action logs
- Audit timeline coordination
- Representative sample selection
- Documentation formatting rules
- Compliance demonstration plans
- Post-assessment monitoring
- Handling non-conformities
- Recertification cycles
- Pre-commit code reviews
- Model registry requirements
- CI/CD pipeline gates
- Monitoring integration points
- Incident escalation triggers
- Change approval workflows
- Access control aligning
- Model version tracking
- Retraining thresholds
- Deployment freeze rules
- Decommissioning logs
- Cross-team handover protocols
- User notification requirements
- Terms of use updates
- System capability disclosures
- Limitations documentation
- Human oversight information
- Contact point publication
- Log retention notices
- Marketing claims review process
- Public register entries
- API documentation rules
- Open source attribution
- License compatibility checks
- Vendor risk assessment
- Contractual compliance clauses
- Substantial modification analysis
- Due diligence checklists
- Audit rights negotiation
- Liability allocation
- Component provenance tracking
- Open source compliance
- Cloud provider SLAs
- Incident notification terms
- Exit strategy planning
- Vendor offboarding
- Incident definition and scope
- Detection and triage
- Escalation paths
- Root cause analysis
- Systemic failure logging
- User impact assessment
- Notification timelines
- Public authority reporting
- Corrective action timelines
- System updates and patches
- Stakeholder communication
- Post-mortem documentation
- Sampling for compliance validation
- Control testing frequency
- Evidence sufficiency standards
- Audit scope definition
- Finding severity tiers
- Remediation tracking
- Audit trail completeness
- Cross-functional feedback
- Reporting templates
- Remediation progress
- Executive summaries
- Follow-up testing
- Model drift monitoring
- Accuracy threshold alerts
- Retraining triggers
- Human review cadence
- Performance degradation logs
- Version rollback criteria
- Feedback loop integration
- Bias recurrence checks
- Security patch response
- Log integrity maintenance
- Change approval tracking
- System decommissioning
- Regulator communication style
- Timeline consistency
- Evidence organization
- Risk rationale documentation
- Precedent references
- Legal defensibility
- Stakeholder alignment
- Gap justification
- Mitigation plans
- Follow-up responsiveness
- Public statements
- Lessons learned reporting
How this maps to your situation
- Preparing for EU market entry with a new AI product
- Responding to internal audit findings on AI systems
- Onboarding third-party AI models under compliance review
- Updating governance documentation ahead of vendor assessment
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per module , designed to be completed in parallel with ongoing work over 6, 8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic AI ethics courses offer broad principles but lack actionable structure. This course delivers precise, enforceable outputs aligned to the AI Act , with templates and examples built for technical practitioners implementing real governance.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.