A tailored course, built for your situation
Sources and specific examples on hand when peers push back
Build unshakable reasoning around ORSA decisions with real-world precedents and clear logic chains
The situation this course is for
Too often, practitioners fall back on 'this is how we've always done it' when challenged on model inputs or scenario weightings. That erodes credibility in cross-functional reviews and limits influence.
Who this is for
Risk practitioners leading ORSA or internal capital model reviews who need to justify methodological choices under scrutiny
Who this is not for
Those looking for introductory ORSA training or general compliance overviews
What you walk away with
- Trace every ORSA assumption back to a documented source or precedent
- Respond to challenges with specific examples from prior cycles or peer firms
- Map NAIC ORSA guidance directly to internal model design choices
- Build annotated workpapers that preempt common pushback
- Structure defensible logic chains for risk aggregation and scenario weighting
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Identifying core assumptions in ORSA workflows
- Mapping inputs to NAIC ORSA guidance sections
- Using prior-year filings as justificatory sources
- Benchmarking against public peer disclosures
- Documenting rationale for volatility assumptions
- Referencing actuarial standards in model design
- Sourcing scenario weights from strategic plans
- Linking risk appetite to governance minutes
- Citing internal research in assumption memos
- Validating tail events with incident logs
- Aligning aggregation methods with precedent
- Avoiding unsubstantiated expert judgment
- Tracing capital results to base assumptions
- Explaining aggregation weights with examples
- Validating diversification benefits
- Justifying concentration adjustments
- Linking model outputs to risk appetite
- Documenting stress test calibration
- Referencing past shocks to justify buffers
- Cross-walking capital to strategic risks
- Explaining tail dependence assumptions
- Mapping internal model results to Solvency II
- Using economic scenarios to justify margins
- Annotating capital allocations by business line
- Handling questions about correlation assumptions
- Defending aggregation method choices
- Responding to scope challenges
- Justifying scenario severity levels
- Explaining tail risk modeling approach
- Addressing model validation feedback
- Clarifying aggregation vs. diversification
- Debunking false precision claims
- Supporting judgment-based inputs
- Challenging external benchmark relevance
- Responding to audit inquiries
- Handling cross-functional model skepticism
- Finding peer ORSA disclosures in 10-Ks
- Extracting scenario assumptions from proxies
- Benchmarking capital levels across insurers
- Using RBC ratios as reference points
- Analyzing tail event responses in filings
- Mapping risk categories to NAIC templates
- Comparing aggregation methods in public data
- Sourcing ERM framework disclosures
- Using A.M. Best reports as justification
- Benchmarking scenario weights
- Leveraging SIFMA publications
- Citing FSOC reports in risk narratives
- Designing annotated assumption logs
- Versioning rationale across cycles
- Creating decision trace matrices
- Linking changes to governance updates
- Summarizing key changes by risk domain
- Capturing dissenting views
- Tracking assumption evolution
- Building change justification templates
- Organizing documentation by NAIC section
- Indexing sources by model input
- Preparing reviewer-facing summaries
- Archiving rationale for continuity
- Explaining correlation matrix construction
- Defending assumed independence
- Justifying simplifying assumptions
- Linking aggregation to risk appetite
- Validating concentration adjustments
- Using historical loss data to inform weights
- Explaining tail risk combination
- Mapping diversification to business model
- Documenting model limitations
- Cross-checking with internal audit
- Aligning with Solvency II approaches
- Annotating dependence assumptions
- Aligning risk scenarios with strategy
- Using ORSA to inform capital allocation
- Linking risk appetite to growth plans
- Mapping shock responses to contingency plans
- Incorporating M&A risks into ORSA
- Using ORSA to stress test new products
- Connecting model outputs to board updates
- Justifying strategic risk selections
- Documenting scenario relevance
- Aligning time horizons with planning
- Using ORSA in divestiture analysis
- Linking capital margins to innovation
- Justifying baseline scenario assumptions
- Explaining stress scenario severity
- Linking shocks to historical events
- Defending tail event likelihood
- Using economic forecasts as inputs
- Benchmarking severity levels
- Validating scenario realism
- Documenting scenario origins
- Handling challenges to plausibility
- Responding to 'worst-case' critiques
- Explaining frequency assumptions
- Cross-checking with catastrophe models
- Applying NAIC actuarial standards
- Referencing ASOP guidance in memos
- Using SOP 16-1 for internal models
- Applying credibility theory to inputs
- Defending smoothing assumptions
- Justifying curve fitting methods
- Using loss development patterns
- Referencing loss reserving standards
- Aligning with valuation practices
- Applying stochastic methods with care
- Validating model outputs against standards
- Citing actuarial research in reviews
- Predicting finance team questions
- Answering capital allocation challenges
- Responding to model validation feedback
- Handling actuarial skepticism
- Clarifying risk aggregation logic
- Justifying time horizon choices
- Defending model simplifications
- Explaining tail risk assumptions
- Addressing data quality concerns
- Supporting judgment-based inputs
- Responding to audit inquiries
- Aligning with internal control frameworks
- Creating standardized rationale templates
- Versioning model assumptions
- Indexing sources by risk domain
- Summarizing key changes annually
- Organizing files for audit readiness
- Using metadata to track decisions
- Building searchable rationale banks
- Linking assumptions to governance
- Documenting change control processes
- Maintaining reviewer access logs
- Creating executive summaries
- Archiving decision trails
- Documenting institutional memory
- Capturing expert judgment
- Building onboarding materials
- Creating model handover checklists
- Archiving rationale across cycles
- Training new staff on assumptions
- Preserving decision context
- Indexing by risk driver
- Linking to governance updates
- Maintaining consistency across reviews
- Updating precedents over time
- Adapting to new regulatory guidance
How this maps to your situation
- Defending ORSA assumptions in executive review
- Responding to internal audit challenges
- Justifying capital model design to actuaries
- Explaining scenario choices to board members
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 2.5 hours per week over 12 weeks, with self-paced access to all materials.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses exclusively on building defensible, source-backed reasoning for ORSA-specific decisions , not broad overviews or awareness training.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.