A tailored course, built for your situation
Strategic AI Vendor Risk Assessment for Public-Sector Programs
A structured, implementation-grade framework for assessing AI vendor risk in public-sector technology programs
The situation this course is for
Even experienced teams struggle to standardize how they assess AI vendors. Without a clear framework, evaluations become ad hoc, inconsistent, or overly reliant on technical teams. This slows deployment, increases audit exposure, and weakens cross-functional trust.
Who this is for
Business and technology professionals in public-sector or public-facing programs who need to evaluate AI vendors with confidence, including program managers, compliance leads, IT directors, and digital transformation leads.
Who this is not for
This course is not for software developers building AI models, nor for executives seeking high-level overviews without implementation detail.
What you walk away with
- Apply a repeatable framework for assessing AI vendor risk across programs
- Align vendor evaluations with federal and municipal compliance requirements
- Conduct technical due diligence without needing a data science background
- Produce audit-ready assessment records and risk summaries
- Lead cross-functional vendor review sessions with structured criteria
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining AI in public-sector procurement
- Common risk profiles by use case
- Regulatory landscape overview
- Ethical considerations in vendor selection
- Stakeholder mapping for AI programs
- Risk tolerance frameworks
- Public accountability and transparency
- Case study: AI in benefits processing
- Case study: AI in public safety analytics
- Balancing innovation and prudence
- Common misconceptions about AI risk
- Setting assessment scope
- Components of a risk assessment framework
- Weighting risk domains by program type
- Creating risk scoring rubrics
- Defining red, yellow, green thresholds
- Incorporating legal and compliance inputs
- Aligning with internal audit standards
- Versioning and documentation
- Framework validation techniques
- Pilot testing with real vendors
- Stakeholder feedback integration
- Scaling across departments
- Maintaining framework relevance
- Data classification standards for public data
- Vendor data handling policies
- Third-party data sourcing risks
- Consent and data provenance tracking
- Anonymization and de-identification practices
- Cross-border data transfer rules
- Right to access and deletion obligations
- Data retention and deletion schedules
- Breach notification requirements
- Audit trails for data access
- Vendor SOC 2 and ISO 27001 alignment
- Data governance maturity assessment
- Defining algorithmic transparency
- Model documentation standards
- Explainability methods by AI type
- Bias detection and mitigation strategies
- Fairness metrics and thresholds
- Third-party model audits
- Human-in-the-loop requirements
- Decision logging and traceability
- Stakeholder communication of AI logic
- Handling black-box models
- Transparency in marketing vs. reality
- Vendor transparency scorecard
- Cloud infrastructure security models
- Penetration testing and red teaming
- Incident response planning
- Encryption in transit and at rest
- Access control and identity management
- Disaster recovery and uptime SLAs
- Vendor network architecture review
- Third-party dependency risks
- Security certifications and attestations
- Patch management practices
- Zero-trust alignment
- Security maturity scoring
- Key AI-specific contract clauses
- Liability and indemnification terms
- Performance guarantees and SLAs
- IP ownership and usage rights
- Right to audit provisions
- Termination and exit rights
- Change control and update protocols
- Subcontractor oversight
- Compliance warranty statements
- Dispute resolution mechanisms
- Force majeure and AI-specific risks
- Legal risk scoring template
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework alignment
- OMB guidance on AI use
- State and municipal AI policies
- Equity impact assessment requirements
- Accessibility standards (Section 508)
- Procurement rules for AI systems
- Public reporting obligations
- Vendor self-assessment validation
- Third-party certification programs
- Compliance gap analysis
- Audit preparation checklist
- Compliance maturity roadmap
- Change management planning
- Staff training and upskilling needs
- Process redesign for AI adoption
- User acceptance testing protocols
- Feedback loop design
- Error handling and escalation paths
- System monitoring and alerts
- Vendor support responsiveness
- Integration with legacy systems
- Operational risk assessment
- Handover and onboarding plans
- Operational readiness checklist
- KPIs for AI system performance
- Model drift detection methods
- Accuracy and reliability tracking
- User satisfaction metrics
- Bias re-evaluation cycles
- Vendor reporting requirements
- Quarterly risk reassessment
- Dashboard design for oversight
- Alert thresholds and escalation
- Third-party monitoring tools
- Audit trail maintenance
- Continuous evaluation playbook
- Public communication principles
- Explaining AI decisions to constituents
- Transparency portal design
- Oversight committee reporting
- Media inquiry preparedness
- Community engagement strategies
- Trust-building through disclosure
- Handling public complaints
- Annual AI impact reports
- Myth-busting common concerns
- Communication tone and clarity
- Stakeholder trust index
- Centralized vs. decentralized models
- Shared assessment libraries
- Cross-program governance councils
- Standardized templates and tools
- Training assessors across teams
- Consistency auditing
- Lessons learned sharing
- Version control for frameworks
- Scaling pilot programs
- Resource allocation planning
- Inter-agency collaboration
- Scaling success metrics
- Generative AI and hallucination risks
- Deepfake detection and response
- Autonomous decision-making boundaries
- AI alignment and goal specification
- Emerging regulatory signals
- International AI governance trends
- Long-term societal impact assessment
- Red teaming future scenarios
- Horizon scanning techniques
- Adaptive framework design
- Vendor innovation vs. stability trade-offs
- Future-proofing checklist
How this maps to your situation
- Evaluating a new AI vendor for a benefits automation program
- Preparing for an audit of an existing AI-powered case management system
- Designing a cross-departmental AI governance policy
- Responding to public concern about algorithmic fairness in housing services
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3, 4 hours per module, designed for flexible, self-paced learning alongside professional responsibilities.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or high-level policy summaries, this program provides implementation-grade tools, real-world templates, and a step-by-step methodology specific to public-sector vendor risk assessment.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.