Skip to main content

Systems Review in Application Development

$249.00
When you get access:
Course access is prepared after purchase and delivered via email
Who trusts this:
Trusted by professionals in 160+ countries
How you learn:
Self-paced • Lifetime updates
Toolkit Included:
Includes a practical, ready-to-use toolkit containing implementation templates, worksheets, checklists, and decision-support materials used to accelerate real-world application and reduce setup time.
Your guarantee:
30-day money-back guarantee — no questions asked
Adding to cart… The item has been added

This curriculum spans the technical, organisational, and operational dimensions of a multi-phase systems review, comparable in scope to an internal capability program that supports enterprise-wide modernisation planning across interconnected application portfolios.

Module 1: Defining Scope and Stakeholder Alignment

  • Selecting which legacy systems to include in the review based on business impact, technical debt, and upcoming project dependencies.
  • Negotiating access to system documentation and logs when owners are in different departments or external vendors.
  • Mapping integration touchpoints across departments to identify hidden interdependencies before scoping the review.
  • Deciding whether to include shadow IT applications based on usage volume and risk exposure.
  • Establishing thresholds for system criticality using uptime requirements and user count data.
  • Documenting conflicting stakeholder priorities and creating a weighted scoring model for inclusion in the review.

Module 2: Data Inventory and Dependency Mapping

  • Using network packet analysis to discover undocumented API calls between systems when metadata is incomplete.
  • Choosing between manual data flow interviews and automated discovery tools based on system age and access permissions.
  • Resolving discrepancies between documented data schemas and actual database structures in production environments.
  • Classifying data sensitivity levels to determine which systems require additional compliance scrutiny.
  • Identifying redundant data stores that violate single-source-of-truth principles but remain in use due to performance needs.
  • Deciding whether to map batch job dependencies that run outside business hours but affect daily operations.

Module 3: Technical Debt Assessment and Codebase Evaluation

  • Running static analysis tools on legacy codebases with outdated syntax and incompatible build environments.
  • Interpreting cyclomatic complexity metrics in context when third-party libraries dominate the codebase.
  • Assessing risk of undocumented custom patches applied directly to production binaries.
  • Determining whether to include configuration files and scripts in technical debt scoring.
  • Documenting absence of version control for critical components and its implications for change tracking.
  • Deciding how to weight obsolete frameworks versus poor coding practices in the final assessment score.

Module 4: Integration Architecture and Interface Review

  • Evaluating whether point-to-point integrations should be refactored into an ESB based on current transaction volume.
  • Identifying integrations using deprecated protocols like FTP or SOAP without encryption in regulated environments.
  • Assessing retry logic and error handling in asynchronous messaging systems during network outages.
  • Documenting lack of idempotency in APIs that cause data duplication during retries.
  • Measuring latency across integration chains to isolate performance bottlenecks.
  • Deciding whether to retain middleware adapters that compensate for incompatible data formats.

Module 5: Security and Compliance Posture Analysis

  • Verifying certificate expiration dates on internal APIs that use self-signed SSL certificates.
  • Reviewing authentication mechanisms for systems that rely on hardcoded credentials in configuration files.
  • Assessing audit trail completeness for systems that overwrite logs after 30 days, violating retention policies.
  • Identifying systems storing personally identifiable information without data masking or encryption at rest.
  • Mapping access controls to job roles and detecting privilege creep in long-standing user accounts.
  • Documenting exceptions granted for compliance requirements and their renewal timelines.

Module 6: Performance and Scalability Benchmarking

  • Designing load tests for batch systems that only run weekly and cannot be interrupted.
  • Isolating database contention issues from application-level memory leaks during peak usage.
  • Measuring response time degradation as data volume increases in monolithic applications.
  • Deciding whether to include third-party service SLAs in end-to-end performance evaluations.
  • Documenting caching strategies that improve performance but risk serving stale data.
  • Assessing auto-scaling configurations in cloud-hosted applications during traffic spikes.

Module 7: Change Management and Operational Readiness

  • Reviewing deployment scripts for hardcoded environment variables that cause promotion failures.
  • Assessing rollback procedures for systems lacking versioned backups or schema migration scripts.
  • Identifying single points of knowledge by mapping support responsibilities across shifts and locations.
  • Evaluating monitoring coverage for critical transactions and defining missing alert thresholds.
  • Documenting use of manual runbooks that have not been updated after system upgrades.
  • Verifying backup restoration intervals and testing recovery point objectives for key applications.

Module 8: Roadmap Development and Prioritization

  • Ranking modernization initiatives using a matrix of business value versus implementation complexity.
  • Deciding whether to decommission systems with low usage but high maintenance costs.
  • Allocating budget across security patches, performance fixes, and feature enhancements.
  • Sequencing integration refactoring to avoid breaking dependent downstream processes.
  • Defining interim controls for high-risk systems when full remediation is delayed.
  • Establishing KPIs for measuring success of review outcomes over a 12-month horizon.