Skip to main content
Image coming soon

Transaction Reporting Harmonization Evidence & Implementation Kit

$249.00
Adding to cart… The item has been added
Transaction Reporting Harmonization for Capital Markets Compliance Officers · one reporting model across MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR · Evidence & Implementation Kit
Report the same trade to MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR from one accurate model, without maintaining three divergent interpretations and reconciling the differences under deadline pressure.
Every control handed to you adopt-ready, from obligation mapping and a harmonized field dictionary through the identifier and reference-data standard, reconciliation and exception management, the integration architecture, and a sequenced migration a regulator or auditor can follow.
Ready in a weekend, not a quarter.

Here is the honest situation. Here is the honest situation. Most firms grew their MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR reporting one regime at a time, each with its own field interpretation, its own enrichment logic and its own submission path, and the result is three overlapping obligations that describe the same trades in incompatible ways. The same economic event carries a different identifier, a different action taxonomy and a different eligibility test in each stream, so the same booking can be reported one way to a trade repository and another way to an approved reporting mechanism, and nobody can prove which is right. Reconciliation becomes a standing exception queue, a rewrite of one regime under a REFIT deadline breaks the others, and an accuracy or completeness finding lands with no single source of truth to defend. Doing this well does not mean reporting harder. It means building one canonical model of the trade, deriving each regime's report from it rather than maintaining three, standardizing the identifiers and reference data every stream depends on, and reconciling forward against that golden source instead of after the fact. Where teams fall short is predictable: no shared field dictionary, identifier and reference data owned separately by each stream, reconciliation run as cleanup rather than control, and a migration sequenced by system convenience rather than regulatory deadline and operational risk.

This Kit removes the guesswork. It is transaction reporting harmonization written as adopt-ready controls you personalize in a weekend, with the evidence a regulator, an auditor or an internal assurance reviewer examines.

What you get, the moment you buy

18
Controls, adopt-ready. Every control, written so you personalize and apply it.
18
Evidence-they-examine checklists. For each control, exactly what a reviewer examines, plus where teams fall short, so you close the gap first.
1
Control Matrix, pre-built. Every control in a working spreadsheet, ready to record status, owner and evidence location.
1
Gap & Readiness Assessment. Score each control and the workbook returns your readiness as a single percentage, and exactly what to fix next.

Grounded in regulatory reporting, data governance and reporting operations practice applied across MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR. Editable Word and Excel files. This is a practitioner method, not legal advice or a substitute for your regulator's rules and validation rules.

Three regimes, one trade, one model
The same trade reported three incompatible ways is an accuracy finding waiting to happen, and the fix is one canonical model, not three reconciled interpretations. This Kit builds the obligation-mapping, field-harmonization, identifier, reconciliation, integration and migration controls that make multi-regime reporting defensible, with the evidence a reviewer asks for.

What one control looks like

This is the opening control, where the assessment begins. All 18 are built to this depth.

TRH-1 Maintain a living cross-regime reporting obligation register REPORTING SCOPE AND OBLIGATION MAPPING
Put this control in place

Require [your organization name] to maintain a living register of every transaction and trade reporting obligation it is subject to, covering UK MiFIR, EMIR under REFIT and SFTR, recording for each the legal basis, the reporting party, whether reporting is single or dual sided, the destination type such as an approved reporting mechanism or a trade repository, and the product and venue scope that triggers it, so the full obligation surface is visible before any report is designed or changed.

Control note.

The register is the input to eligibility logic and to every other control, so a missing obligation here is a compliance gap by definition.

Evidence a reviewer examines
  • A reporting obligation register listing each regime with its legal basis, reporting party and sidedness
  • Scope criteria per regime mapping product and venue characteristics to the obligation they trigger
  • Evidence the register is reviewed and updated when products, venues, entities or regulations change
Common finding they raise: Teams document the obligations they remember and miss ones triggered by a new product, a new venue relationship or a changed counterparty classification, leaving whole populations unreported.

Why this is not another template pack

  • The evidence is the point. A reporting stream you cannot evidence as accurate and complete is a finding waiting to land. This tells you what a regulator or auditor examines and where teams fall short, for every control.
  • The regime specifics built in. The obligation map across MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR, the harmonized field dictionary, the identifier and reference-data standard, forward reconciliation, the integration architecture and the sequenced migration are written into the controls, not left generic.
  • Built on real practice, not one person's opinion, grounded in how multi-regime reporting is actually harmonized and how accuracy is actually defended to a regulator.
  • It compounds. This work shares its shape with data governance, risk data aggregation and operational resilience, so it feeds your wider compliance and data practice.

Who buys this

Compliance officers, regulatory reporting managers and data architects who own MiFIR, EMIR or SFTR reporting and have to prove it is accurate and complete. Whether this is your first structured harmonization pass or a REFIT-driven uplift, you save weeks and walk in with your obligation-mapping, field-harmonization, identifier, reconciliation, integration and migration controls structured.

By the end of the weekend you will have
✓  An adopt-ready control for all 18 areas
✓  A completed control matrix
✓  The evidence a reviewer examines
✓  All three regimes covered from one model
✓  A readiness percentage and a fix list
✓  The highest-risk gaps closed

Common questions

Is it really editable? Yes. Word and Excel files you own and adapt. No portal, no subscription.

Does it cover all three regimes? Yes. Reporting scope and obligation mapping, data model and field harmonization, reference data and identifiers, reconciliation and exception management, system integration and architecture, and migration, governance and controls each have their own controls with their own evidence, applied across MiFIR, EMIR and SFTR.

Is this tied to one vendor or system? No. The controls are principle-level, the obligation map, the harmonized field dictionary, the identifier and reference-data standard, forward reconciliation and the sequenced migration, so they apply whatever trade-capture, enrichment and submission systems you run, alongside your reporting team rather than replacing it.

What if it is not for me? A 30-day money-back guarantee.

Do not let your next accuracy finding arrive with no single source of truth to defend.
Every control is fast to adopt with the Kit. It is instant, and it is guaranteed.
Add it to your cart and be ready this weekend.

Instant digital download · 30-day money-back guarantee · The Art of Service Pty Ltd, GPO Box 2673, Brisbane QLD 4001 · support@theartofservice.com

!