The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
AI Agents and Automation for Senior Leaders
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing the routing, chasing and re-keying between systems that nobody owns.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
Every day, your team spends hours moving data across disconnected systems, following up on tasks that should have closed, and re-entering information no single system owns. This work is invisible in dashboards but critical to outcomes. Now, AI agents perform these tasks continuously, without fatigue. You must decide: do you adapt the function, or let it erode under new expectations?
Who this is for
Senior Leader responsible for operational continuity in healthcare eligibility, prior authorization, patient scheduling, compliance tracking, or cross-system coordination.
Who this is not for
Individual contributors building AI tools, technical founders, investors, or procurement teams evaluating vendors.
What you walk away with
- Map where AI agents are already performing operational tasks
- Identify which workflows are becoming obsolete
- Define ownership in a world of autonomous execution
- Align leadership on transition pathways
- Build a playbook for human-AI handoffs
How this maps to your situation
- You inherit a function with distributed ownership
- You observe work being done without clear human action
- You are expected to improve outcomes without new hires
- You must lead adaptation without technical expertise
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed for asynchronous completion over 6–8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike vendor-led training or technical certifications, this course focuses on leadership decisions, operational ownership, and workflow adaptation—not tools or platforms. It equips you to lead without needing to become an AI specialist.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- Defining AI agents in the context of daily operations
- Recognizing the tasks currently handled by AI agents
- Mapping workflows that rely on manual handoffs today
- Identifying systems that lack clear ownership
- Understanding the difference between automation and agency
- Reviewing real examples of AI-driven patient scheduling
- Analyzing how eligibility checks are now performed autonomously
- Tracing the path of a prior authorization request
- Documenting where humans still intervene unnecessarily
- Assessing the cost of delays in agent-handled workflows
- Classifying tasks by ownership and system boundaries
- Benchmarking current performance against agentic potential
- Identifying workflows that span multiple departments
- Tracking tasks that require re-entry across platforms
- Measuring time spent on follow-ups and status checks
- Documenting instances of lost information in transit
- Mapping the lifecycle of a patient referral
- Analyzing where faxes, emails, and calls replace integration
- Reviewing audit logs for manual intervention points
- Identifying recurring tasks that lack ownership
- Assessing escalation paths for stalled processes
- Calculating the volume of 'chasing' per team member
- Evaluating the reliability of cross-system handoffs
- Documenting exceptions that break standard workflows
- Listing all systems involved in core operations
- Mapping team responsibilities across system boundaries
- Identifying handoff points between roles
- Documenting who resolves errors in data transfer
- Reviewing escalation procedures for failed tasks
- Assessing clarity of role definitions in workflows
- Interviewing staff about ambiguous ownership
- Analyzing incident reports for ownership gaps
- Evaluating response times at handoff points
- Mapping communication channels used for coordination
- Identifying tasks with no designated owner
- Assessing leadership alignment on accountability
- Reviewing system logs for non-human activity
- Identifying tasks completed outside business hours
- Detecting patterns of rapid form filling and submission
- Analyzing response times inconsistent with human pace
- Spotting automated retries after failed submissions
- Mapping interactions initiated by external systems
- Reviewing audit trails for repeated sequences
- Identifying tasks with no human timestamp
- Assessing changes in error rates over time
- Detecting sudden improvements in processing speed
- Documenting instances of unsupervised decision making
- Correlating system updates with workflow changes
- Assessing employee frustration with repetitive tasks
- Measuring time spent on low-value follow-ups
- Reviewing turnover in high-churn operational roles
- Identifying tasks staff wish were automated
- Documenting workarounds used to bypass delays
- Analyzing feedback from team retrospectives
- Evaluating engagement with cross-departmental tasks
- Reviewing time tracking data for non-productive effort
- Assessing perception of fairness in workload distribution
- Identifying roles most affected by system gaps
- Measuring reliance on individual 'heroes' to close gaps
- Planning for role evolution in an agentic environment
- Classifying tasks by decision complexity and risk
- Mapping workflows that require human judgment
- Identifying tasks suitable for full autonomy
- Defining boundaries for AI-initiated actions
- Reviewing compliance requirements for delegation
- Assessing patient safety implications of automation
- Documenting approval chains for AI-generated actions
- Establishing thresholds for human review
- Creating rules for escalation from AI to human
- Defining audit requirements for agent decisions
- Setting limits on AI access to sensitive data
- Designing fallback procedures for agent failure
- Defining leadership accountability for agentic outcomes
- Establishing cross-functional governance committees
- Setting policies for AI-initiated communication
- Documenting approval workflows for agent changes
- Creating version control for agent logic updates
- Reviewing performance metrics for AI tasks
- Establishing incident response for agent errors
- Defining roles for monitoring agent behavior
- Implementing regular audits of agent decisions
- Setting thresholds for automatic suspension
- Designing reporting structures for agent activity
- Aligning legal and compliance teams on oversight
- Mapping current handoff points in workflows
- Identifying bottlenecks in human-to-AI transition
- Designing clear triggers for AI initiation
- Defining handback conditions from AI to human
- Creating standardized handoff documentation
- Testing handoff reliability under load
- Evaluating clarity of status updates between actors
- Designing notifications for AI task completion
- Establishing protocols for disputed decisions
- Reviewing timing of handoffs for efficiency
- Assessing training needs for handoff management
- Documenting exceptions to standard handoff rules
- Inventorying all systems in the workflow ecosystem
- Mapping data formats used across platforms
- Identifying fields that require manual translation
- Documenting authentication barriers between systems
- Reviewing API availability and limitations
- Assessing reliance on screen scraping techniques
- Evaluating fax and email as integration proxies
- Identifying workarounds for missing interfaces
- Planning for fallback when AI access is blocked
- Documenting access credentials and permissions
- Assessing security implications of cross-system access
- Designing monitoring for integration failures
- Defining success for AI-handled tasks
- Tracking cycle time for agent-managed workflows
- Measuring first-contact resolution rates
- Assessing accuracy of AI-generated data entries
- Monitoring error rates in autonomous submissions
- Evaluating patient and provider satisfaction with AI interactions
- Tracking volume of human interventions required
- Measuring system uptime for agent access
- Analyzing cost per task in agentic workflows
- Benchmarking against pre-agentic performance
- Creating dashboards for agent activity oversight
- Reporting on compliance adherence by AI agents
- Communicating the purpose of AI agent integration
- Addressing fears about job displacement
- Reframing roles around oversight and exception handling
- Training staff on monitoring AI performance
- Updating job descriptions for new responsibilities
- Recognizing contributions in a hybrid workflow
- Facilitating cross-team collaboration on AI adoption
- Managing resistance to workflow changes
- Celebrating early wins with agentic systems
- Providing channels for feedback on AI behavior
- Aligning incentives with agentic outcomes
- Building a culture of continuous adaptation
- Summarizing findings from workflow assessments
- Prioritizing workflows for agentic transformation
- Defining success criteria for each initiative
- Assigning ownership for transition oversight
- Creating timelines based on system dependencies
- Documenting governance structures for each workflow
- Outlining training requirements for staff
- Designing pilot programs for high-impact areas
- Establishing feedback loops for iteration
- Planning for scalability and reuse
- Integrating playbook updates into regular reviews
- Scheduling leadership check-ins on progress
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.