The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
AI Incident Response for Compliance and Operations Leaders
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing aI security is becoming a critical control function, not just a technical safeguard. Upwind’s valuation and Horizon3’s attack simulation focus show that AI-enabled threats are now assumed to be inevitable and high-impact. This means compliance and operations leaders will be held accountable for AI-related breaches even if the tools are sourced externally. The immediate question: Run a tabletop exercise this week simulating an AI model leaking regulated data and identify where your team lacks visibility.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
AI systems are now embedded in core services, yet no clear ownership exists for when they fail. Compliance leaders are being held accountable for breaches even when models are third-party or cloud-hosted. Tabletop exercises are not standardized. Runbooks are missing. Decision authority is unclear. The regulator is watching, and your team lacks visibility into the data, model behavior, and response chain.
Who this is for
The IT, operations, compliance, or service management lead responsible for risk, continuity, and regulatory outcomes in AI-enabled environments
Who this is not for
This is not for data scientists, AI developers, or security engineers focused on model tuning or code-level defenses. This is for leaders who own accountability when AI systems fail.
What you walk away with
- Establish clear ownership and decision pathways for AI incidents
- Run effective tabletop exercises that expose response gaps
- Build an auditable incident response framework for regulators
- Integrate AI risk into existing service continuity and compliance programs
- Produce documented artifacts that satisfy audit requirements
How this maps to your situation
- You inherit responsibility for AI incidents with no playbook
- You must prove readiness to auditors or regulators
- Your team failed a recent tabletop exercise
- An AI model incident nearly occurred last quarter
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside regular work. Most learners finish in 6–8 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic cybersecurity courses, this program focuses exclusively on the governance, coordination, and compliance decisions required when AI systems fail. It does not teach coding or model defense. It teaches how to lead when the model leaks data, generates harmful content, or violates regulations.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- Identify the legal and operational owner of AI incidents
- Map AI use cases to existing compliance frameworks
- Determine accountability for third-party model failures
- Establish the chain of command during an AI incident
- Classify AI incidents by regulatory impact and urgency
- Define the roles of compliance, IT, and legal teams
- Document incident ownership in service agreements
- Create a RACI matrix for AI incident response
- Align AI response ownership with existing GRC structure
- Assess current ownership clarity with a quick audit
- Interview stakeholders to uncover response blind spots
- Deliver a signed incident ownership charter
- Conduct a census of all active AI models in production
- Classify AI systems by data type and processing purpose
- Identify models handling regulated personal information
- Map AI data flows from input to output
- Determine where model outputs are stored or shared
- Assess third-party AI vendor compliance posture
- Document model dependencies and API integrations
- Evaluate model retraining schedules and data sources
- Flag models with autonomous decision-making authority
- Score AI systems using a risk exposure matrix
- Prioritize high-risk models for response planning
- Produce a living AI system exposure register
- Select incident types based on regulatory impact
- Build a scenario where AI leaks protected health data
- Simulate unauthorized model access via API abuse
- Create a case of AI-generated misinformation at scale
- Design a prompt injection attack on customer service bots
- Model data poisoning during model retraining
- Outline a denial-of-service scenario for AI inference
- Craft a scenario involving model bias in hiring
- Simulate AI hallucination in financial reporting
- Develop a supply chain attack on model weights
- Test response to model drift affecting compliance
- Run a red team exercise on AI access controls
- Define objectives for the first tabletop exercise
- Invite cross-functional participants from legal and IT
- Set ground rules for safe-to-fail simulation
- Distribute scenario briefs 48 hours in advance
- Facilitate role-based response discussions
- Track decisions made under time pressure
- Capture communication breakdowns in real time
- Identify missing data sources during simulation
- Document escalation paths that failed to activate
- Debrief with a structured after-action review
- Produce a gap analysis from exercise findings
- Prioritize improvements for next quarter
- Define the structure of an AI incident runbook
- Outline initial detection and triage procedures
- Specify data preservation requirements for AI logs
- List required forensic data from model providers
- Create escalation checklists for legal notification
- Define communication templates for internal teams
- Draft customer notification language for AI breaches
- Include model rollback and disable procedures
- Add steps to isolate compromised AI endpoints
- Integrate runbooks with existing ITSM workflows
- Version control and audit trail for runbook changes
- Validate runbook usability with a dry run
- Identify key performance indicators for AI models
- Define normal input distribution for trained models
- Monitor for unexpected output patterns or bias
- Set thresholds for API call volume and frequency
- Track model confidence score degradation over time
- Log all prompt and response pairs for auditability
- Establish baseline for model retraining intervals
- Detect unauthorized access to model endpoints
- Monitor for data leakage in AI-generated text
- Flag anomalous user behavior in AI interfaces
- Integrate monitoring alerts with SIEM systems
- Document baseline metrics for regulatory review
- Map AI risks to SOC 2 control objectives
- Align AI incident logs with evidence requirements
- Update internal audit checklists to include AI
- Report AI exposure in board-level risk dashboards
- Include AI scenarios in annual compliance training
- Document AI controls for ISO 27001 certification
- Link AI incident response to GDPR breach reporting
- Add AI model inventory to asset compliance audits
- Require AI risk assessment in vendor onboarding
- Incorporate AI into business continuity testing
- Track AI control effectiveness in quarterly reviews
- Produce an annual AI risk statement for executives
- Evaluate vendor incident response SLAs
- Demand access to model telemetry and logs
- Negotiate rights to audit third-party AI systems
- Define data ownership in AI service contracts
- Require breach notification timelines under 72 hours
- Assess model transparency and explainability
- Verify third-party model security certifications
- Test vendor runbooks through joint exercises
- Document fallback plans for vendor outages
- Track AI model versioning and update practices
- Enforce data retention policies in vendor agreements
- Maintain a register of all third-party AI dependencies
- Define a single source of truth for incident facts
- Assign a central communications lead for AI events
- Draft holding statements for public disclosure
- Coordinate messaging across legal, PR, and IT
- Train spokespeople on AI-specific terminology
- Create internal status update templates
- Establish customer communication escalation paths
- Prepare FAQs for AI incident scenarios
- Time communications to regulatory deadlines
- Log all external disclosures for audit purposes
- Review messaging with legal before release
- Conduct a comms post-mortem after resolution
- Declare a safe space for post-incident learning
- Collect logs, decisions, and communications
- Interview responders within 72 hours of resolution
- Map the incident timeline minute by minute
- Identify the root cause of AI system failure
- Assess whether runbooks were followed correctly
- Document what worked and what failed
- Assign action items with owners and deadlines
- Update runbooks and training based on findings
- Share lessons learned across departments
- Archive post-mortem for auditor access
- Schedule a follow-up to verify fixes
- Identify business units with high AI exposure
- Train local incident coordinators in each division
- Standardize runbooks across departments
- Create a central AI incident response registry
- Host quarterly cross-functional readiness drills
- Publish a global AI incident policy
- Integrate AI response into onboarding programs
- Measure response maturity with a scoring framework
- Recognize teams that improve AI readiness
- Report aggregate AI risk metrics to executives
- Update response playbooks based on new threats
- Conduct annual certification of AI response leads
- Schedule biannual tabletop exercises for AI
- Review and update runbooks every quarter
- Track regulatory changes affecting AI use
- Refresh training materials with new scenarios
- Audit AI system inventory for completeness
- Benchmark response maturity against peers
- Update vendor contracts with new requirements
- Report AI incident readiness to the board
- Maintain a log of near-miss AI events
- Investigate false positives in AI monitoring
- Adjust baselines based on model retraining
- Celebrate milestones in AI risk reduction
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.