The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
Assessing and Evidencing ISO 19770 for Practitioners
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing they already hold the ISO 19770 playbook: the implementation guide, the roadmap and the working files, so repeating any of that is worthless. What is missing is the layer after implementation. How to assess the function honestly, what evidence to retain, how to score maturity, and how to put the result in front of a manager, an auditor or a client who was not involved. The immediate question: for one month of ISO 19770 work, can you show what was measured, against what target, and what changed as a result.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
You already have the implementation guides, the roadmap, and the working files. But when a manager, auditor, or client asks for proof of effectiveness, you’re left scrambling. You need a structured way to assess what’s working, retain defensible evidence, score maturity objectively, and report outcomes clearly—all without repeating implementation basics. The pressure isn’t to do the work again. It’s to prove it was done well.
Who this is for
The practitioner who owns the ISO 19770 software asset management function, has completed implementation assets, and now must demonstrate effectiveness to others.
Who this is not for
People looking for implementation templates, foundational training on ISO 19770, or vendor product comparisons.
What you walk away with
- Score the maturity of your software asset management function using ISO 19770 criteria
- Identify and retain only the evidence that matters to auditors and stakeholders
- Produce a defensible assessment report from one month of operational activity
- Align internal reviews with external audit expectations for ISO 19770 compliance
- Turn routine software inventory and compliance tasks into measurable outcomes
How this maps to your situation
- You’ve implemented ISO 19770 and need to prove it.
- You’re preparing for an audit or client review.
- You must report maturity to management quarterly.
- You’re building a long-term SAM assurance function.
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 20 hours of focused work over 4 to 6 weeks, including completion of templates and evidence mapping exercises.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses or vendor-led implementations, this course focuses exclusively on post-implementation assessment—what to measure, how to score, what to keep, and how to report—using only the assets you already hold.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- Defining assessment versus implementation in software asset management
- Understanding the role of evidence in ISO 19770 compliance
- Mapping existing controls to measurable outcomes
- Identifying key stakeholders and their evidence needs
- Differentiating maturity models used in practice
- Setting boundaries for scope and review frequency
- Recognizing common assessment pitfalls in SAM functions
- Using ISO 19770-1 to frame objective scoring
- Documenting the purpose of each assessment cycle
- Aligning assessment goals with organizational risk appetite
- Establishing ownership of evidence retention processes
- Creating a baseline for comparative maturity scoring
- Selecting evidence types that satisfy auditor requirements
- Designing a retention schedule for compliance artifacts
- Classifying evidence by control category and risk level
- Linking evidence to specific clauses in ISO 19770-1
- Using metadata to streamline evidence retrieval
- Avoiding over-collection of redundant documentation
- Creating evidence trails for software reconciliation
- Documenting decision logs for audit transparency
- Standardizing evidence naming and storage conventions
- Integrating evidence workflows with existing tools
- Validating evidence completeness before review cycles
- Using time-stamped records to prove consistency
- Adapting the ISO 19770 maturity model to your context
- Defining scoring criteria for policy enforcement
- Evaluating completeness of software identification processes
- Scoring accuracy of license position calculations
- Measuring frequency and reliability of data updates
- Assessing integration between discovery and entitlements
- Rating documentation quality across SAM processes
- Scoring stakeholder engagement in compliance reviews
- Evaluating exception handling and remediation tracking
- Measuring consistency of process execution over time
- Using weighted scoring for high-risk control areas
- Benchmarking scores across departments or subsidiaries
- Scheduling review cadence based on risk exposure
- Preparing pre-meeting evidence packets for reviewers
- Facilitating cross-functional SAM review discussions
- Documenting findings and action items from meetings
- Assigning ownership for remediation tasks
- Tracking progress on outstanding control gaps
- Using meeting minutes to support audit defense
- Incorporating legal and procurement input into reviews
- Escalating unresolved issues to senior management
- Aligning review outcomes with financial reporting
- Maintaining a register of control exceptions
- Reviewing evidence sufficiency before external audits
- Anticipating auditor questions about SAM controls
- Preparing evidence dossiers for compliance checks
- Simulating audit walkthroughs with internal teams
- Validating completeness of software inventory data
- Confirming alignment between contracts and usage
- Testing traceability from discovery to entitlements
- Responding to auditor requests without over-disclosing
- Maintaining chain of custody for key records
- Preparing statements of compliance for external parties
- Documenting compensating controls for gaps
- Using prior audit findings to improve readiness
- Creating a single source of truth for auditors
- Summarizing maturity scores for leadership review
- Translating SAM metrics into business risk terms
- Highlighting cost avoidance from compliance efforts
- Presenting trends in license position accuracy
- Demonstrating return on SAM function investment
- Using dashboards to show control effectiveness
- Reporting on audit exposure reduction over time
- Communicating SAM achievements without jargon
- Aligning SAM outcomes with ESG reporting goals
- Including SAM in enterprise risk management briefings
- Measuring reduction in manual intervention needs
- Tying SAM performance to procurement decisions
- Structuring client-facing SAM compliance statements
- Redacting sensitive data while preserving credibility
- Using standardized templates for consistency
- Verifying third-party audit requirements in advance
- Preparing for on-site evidence demonstrations
- Responding to client questionnaires accurately
- Maintaining version control of shared reports
- Documenting scope limitations in disclosures
- Using independent validation to strengthen claims
- Handling requests for real-time data access
- Establishing service level agreements for reporting
- Archiving client-specific evidence packages
- Scheduling recurring maturity evaluations
- Automating evidence collection where possible
- Integrating assessment tasks into operational roles
- Updating scoring criteria as environments change
- Reviewing evidence retention policies annually
- Incorporating feedback from audit findings
- Adjusting control focus based on risk trends
- Tracking improvements in data accuracy over time
- Measuring reduction in manual reconciliation effort
- Using trend analysis to predict future gaps
- Aligning assessment cycles with fiscal reporting
- Evaluating tooling effectiveness through usage data
- Validating accuracy of software identification results
- Assessing frequency and coverage of discovery scans
- Linking discovery logs to inventory reconciliation
- Using fingerprinting consistency as a control metric
- Measuring time to detect new software instances
- Evaluating agent coverage across device types
- Scoring reliability of version and edition data
- Documenting discovery tool configuration settings
- Tracking changes in discovery coverage over time
- Correlating discovery data with procurement records
- Using scan logs to prove data freshness
- Auditing discovery tool access and change logs
- Verifying completeness of license repository records
- Assessing accuracy of license position reports
- Tracking changes to contractual terms over time
- Documenting license metric interpretations
- Validating rights to use across deployment models
- Scoring consistency of license reconciliation
- Using purchase orders to support entitlement claims
- Maintaining records of license transfers and reharvesting
- Evaluating compliance with true-up obligations
- Demonstrating adherence to license exceptions
- Auditing access to license management systems
- Linking entitlement data to financial audits
- Documenting approval workflows for software requests
- Auditing change requests in SAM systems
- Reviewing exception approvals for compliance risk
- Tracking remediation of non-compliant findings
- Measuring adherence to software standardization policies
- Using training records to prove awareness
- Evaluating frequency of policy updates
- Scoring consistency of decommissioning processes
- Monitoring compliance with procurement gateways
- Auditing access to privileged SAM functions
- Reviewing incident logs related to SAM controls
- Measuring response time to compliance alerts
- Aggregating maturity scores across control domains
- Writing executive summaries for non-technical readers
- Combining discovery, entitlement, and process evidence
- Creating visual timelines of compliance improvements
- Using before-and-after comparisons to show progress
- Including scoring methodology in appendices
- Referencing ISO 19770 clauses in report footnotes
- Attaching evidence location indexes for auditors
- Stating limitations and scope exclusions transparently
- Obtaining sign-off from responsible stakeholders
- Archiving final reports with access controls
- Preparing summary decks for board-level reviews
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.