A focused course, tailored for you
Financial Crime Risk for Transaction Banking Managers
Build the investigation workflow, typology library, and AUSTRAC-ready reporting stack that separates a reactive team from a proactive one.
The SAR that took eleven days to clear compliance review because the narrative missed the layering analysis. The customer escalation that landed on your desk because the transaction monitoring alert was closed without a documented rationale. The AUSTRAC audit prep that surfaced three undocumented typology calls from the previous quarter. These are not edge cases for a Financial Crime Risk Manager in transaction banking. They are the recurring friction that makes the role feel reactive when it should feel controlled.
Includes a hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access, generated for your specific situation.
Why this course
Transaction banking generates a specific class of financial crime exposure: high-volume, low-individual-value payments across corridors that mix legitimate trade finance with layering risk. A Manager in this function is accountable for the investigation decisions their analysts make, the SAR narratives that reach compliance, and the typology coverage that underpins the annual AUSTRAC regulatory return. When any of those three layers is thin, the audit finding lands on the Manager's desk, not the analyst's. The problem is rarely effort. It is the absence of a documented, repeatable methodology that holds up under regulatory scrutiny and scales without the Manager reviewing every file personally.
What you walk away with
- Build a triage framework that routes transaction monitoring alerts by risk score, corridor type, and customer segment without requiring Manager sign-off on every decision.
- Map the specific layering, structuring, and trade-based money laundering typologies that apply to the payment corridors your desk runs.
- Write SAR narratives that pass compliance review on first submission by structuring the transaction chronology, the layering analysis, and the reasonable grounds finding in the order your compliance function actually reads them.
- Document the typology rationale for every closed alert so the next AUSTRAC audit finds a decision log, not a gap.
- Build a 30-day onboarding module for new analysts that encodes your investigation methodology without requiring you to shadow every case.
- Produce the typology library and corridor risk map that forms the evidentiary backbone of your next annual AUSTRAC return.
The 12 modules
How this addresses your situation
Specific modules that map to what you said you are dealing with.
What you get with this course
- 12 written modules covering investigation workflow, typology mapping, SAR narrative construction, and AUSTRAC regulatory reporting.
- Downloadable triage decision matrix template calibrated to transaction banking alert volumes.
- SAR narrative template structured for compliance review pass on first submission.
- TBML typology reference card for use during alert review.
- Typology library template with quarterly update process.
- Analyst onboarding module outline and assessment rubric.
- AUSTRAC regulatory readiness checklist mapped to examination scope.
- Internal evidence pack template for the annual AUSTRAC compliance return.
- The hand-built implementation playbook, delivered alongside course access within 24 hours.
What you will have in hand by Day 1, Week 1, Month 1
Within 24 hours of purchase: course access provisioned in the Art of Service learning environment and the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside it.
Before and after
SARs sitting in compliance review for ten-plus days because the layering narrative needs rework. Closed alerts without documented typology rationale. Annual AUSTRAC return requiring a reconstruction of evidence that should have been retained throughout the year.
A triage framework your analysts run without Manager escalation. SAR narratives that pass compliance review on first submission. A typology library that makes the annual AUSTRAC return a compilation exercise. An onboarding module that makes new analysts investigation-ready in 30 days.
What happens if you do not address this
The next AUSTRAC examination will find the same undocumented typology rationale that the last one found, because the investigation methodology is still in the Manager's head rather than in a documented, auditable framework. The compliance relationship deteriorates and the regulatory uplift requirement lands.
Who it is for
A Financial Crime Risk Manager or Senior Analyst in transaction banking at a major Australian financial institution, accountable for alert triage quality, SAR production, and AUSTRAC regulatory reporting. Probably managing two to six analysts. Has seen at least one compliance review push back on a SAR narrative for insufficient typology analysis or missing layering evidence. Wants to build the kind of repeatable workflow that makes the team self-sufficient and the regulatory relationships straightforward.
How it arrives
Text-based course in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every module, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment. Approximately 8-10 hours across the 12 modules, plus implementation time for the frameworks and templates in your team's existing investigation workflow.
Why $199 is the right number
AUSTRAC-run industry forums cover regulatory expectations but not the internal workflow design. External AML consultants charge $15,000-$40,000 for an investigation framework review and produce a report that sits in a drawer. Internal policy rewrites take six months and require legal review. This course produces working templates your team uses immediately, at $199.
FAQ
30-day money-back guarantee. If after a week of working through the materials this is not what you needed, reply to the receipt email and a full refund is processed. No questions, no forms.
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.