Skip to main content

Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering Persuasion and Negotiation

$201.00
Your guarantee:
30-day money-back guarantee — no questions asked
When you get access:
Course access is prepared after purchase and delivered via email
Who trusts this:
Trusted by professionals in 160+ countries
Toolkit Included:
Includes a practical, ready-to-use toolkit containing implementation templates, worksheets, checklists, and decision-support materials used to accelerate real-world application and reduce setup time.
How you learn:
Self-paced • Lifetime updates
Adding to cart… The item has been added

What does the Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course cover?

Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering is covered here in 7 modules: Diagnosing Group Conflict Origins and Influence Pathways, Applying Influence Principles in Group Decision-Making Contexts, Designing Negotiation Frameworks for Multi-Party Disputes and 4 more. The outline lists 42 specific topics, opening with conduct stakeholder mapping to identify formal and informal power holders within team structures before initiating conflict.

How do you approach Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering step by step?

The work is sequenced in 7 stages. It starts with Diagnosing Group Conflict Origins and Influence Pathways, moves through Applying Influence Principles in Group Decision-Making Contexts and Designing Negotiation Frameworks for Multi-Party Disputes, and ends at Evaluating Outcomes and Mitigating Backlash. Each stage carries its own topic list, so the sequence is followed rather than summarised.

What is in Module 1 of the Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course?

Module 1 is Diagnosing Group Conflict Origins and Influence Pathways. It works through conduct stakeholder mapping to identify formal and informal power holders within team structures before initiating conflict resolution., use conflict typology frameworks (e.g., task vs. relationship vs. process conflict) to classify disputes and determine appropriate intervention strategies., assess communication patterns in teams using meeting transcripts or observational logs to detect.

How is the Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course delivered?

The Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course is fully self-paced with immediate online access after enrolment. Access does not expire and future updates are included at no cost. It can be taken on any device, and a certificate of completion is issued by The Art of Service when you finish.

How much does the Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course cost?

The Group Conflict in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering course is $198 as a one time payment. There is no subscription, no per seat licence and no hidden fee. Enrolment carries a 30 day satisfied or refunded guarantee, so it can be assessed in full before you commit.

Closely related courses: Group Conflict Resolution in Brainstorming Affinity, Conflict Resolution in The Psychology of Influence, Group Suppression in The Psychology of Influence, Group Dynamics in The Psychology of Influence - Mastering.

More answers: what you get with every course, refund policy, all help answers.

This curriculum spans the design and execution of multi-workshop conflict intervention programs, comparable to internal capability-building initiatives that address power dynamics, decision-making distortions, and systemic influence patterns in complex team environments.

Module 1: Diagnosing Group Conflict Origins and Influence Pathways

  • Conduct stakeholder mapping to identify formal and informal power holders within team structures before initiating conflict resolution.
  • Use conflict typology frameworks (e.g., task vs. relationship vs. process conflict) to classify disputes and determine appropriate intervention strategies.
  • Assess communication patterns in teams using meeting transcripts or observational logs to detect recurring triggers of influence breakdowns.
  • Decide whether to intervene publicly or privately based on the visibility and escalation risk of the conflict.
  • Balance transparency with confidentiality when gathering input from multiple parties involved in a dispute.
  • Integrate psychological safety assessments into conflict diagnosis to determine if underlying fear of speaking up is contributing to passive-aggressive dynamics.

Module 2: Applying Influence Principles in Group Decision-Making Contexts

  • Select between reciprocity and scarcity tactics based on resource availability and timeline pressures in team negotiations.
  • Design agenda structures that leverage commitment and consistency by securing early small agreements before addressing contentious items.
  • Identify and neutralize inappropriate use of social proof, such as false consensus claims, during group deliberations.
  • Train facilitators to recognize when authority bias is suppressing dissenting opinions in hierarchical teams.
  • Intervene when liking-based alliances create subgroups that distort consensus-building processes.
  • Implement pre-commitment devices, such as written position statements, to reduce last-minute positional shifts during negotiations.

Module 3: Designing Negotiation Frameworks for Multi-Party Disputes

  • Choose between integrative and distributive approaches based on whether long-term relationships or one-time outcomes are prioritized.
  • Establish ground rules for information sharing to prevent strategic withholding or ambush tactics in cross-functional negotiations.
  • Determine the optimal sequence for bilateral talks versus full-group sessions to manage complexity and build trust incrementally.
  • Decide when to introduce a third-party mediator based on impasse duration and escalation of emotional tension.
  • Structure side conversations to avoid perception of collusion while allowing necessary pre-negotiation alignment.
  • Define objective criteria for success (e.g., measurable KPIs) to reduce reliance on positional bargaining.

Module 4: Managing Power Asymmetries and Influence Tactics

  • Monitor for coercive compliance tactics, such as deadline manipulation or exclusion from key meetings, and establish countermeasures.
  • Introduce structured speaking turns in meetings to mitigate dominance by high-power individuals.
  • Train lower-power participants in assertive communication techniques without escalating conflict.
  • Decide whether to expose or redirect covert influence attempts, such as triangulation or rumor spreading, based on organizational culture.
  • Implement escalation protocols for reporting unethical persuasion attempts while protecting whistleblowers.
  • Balance empowerment initiatives with accountability mechanisms to prevent counterproductive overreach.

Module 5: Facilitating High-Stakes Group Interventions

  • Select intervention format (workshop, facilitated dialogue, or structured feedback session) based on conflict severity and time constraints.
  • Pre-brief participants on expected behaviors and consequences for violating dialogue norms.
  • Design seating arrangements and timing to minimize defensiveness and maximize engagement.
  • Integrate real-time feedback mechanisms, such as pulse checks, to adjust facilitation approach mid-session.
  • Manage emotional volatility by scripting de-escalation responses for common triggers.
  • Document agreements and action items with assigned ownership to ensure follow-through.

Module 6: Institutionalizing Conflict Resolution and Influence Norms

  • Embed conflict resolution expectations into team charters and performance evaluation criteria.
  • Develop escalation ladders that define when and how disputes move to higher authorities.
  • Train managers to conduct routine conflict audits during team check-ins.
  • Design feedback loops to capture lessons from resolved conflicts and update protocols.
  • Align influence training with organizational values to prevent misuse of persuasion techniques.
  • Monitor for cultural drift by auditing communication artifacts (emails, meeting notes) for early signs of deteriorating norms.

Module 7: Evaluating Outcomes and Mitigating Backlash

  • Measure changes in team effectiveness using pre- and post-intervention performance data.
  • Track relationship repair through anonymous sentiment surveys focused on trust and collaboration.
  • Identify residual resentment by analyzing participation patterns in subsequent meetings.
  • Adjust follow-up frequency based on risk of relapse into old conflict patterns.
  • Address perception of bias in intervention outcomes by publishing decision rationales with redacted details.
  • Revise influence protocols when data shows consistent misuse or unintended consequences.