What is the Industrial Automation Strategy course about?
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing deciding which automation technologies to scale across production facilities this year. Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up.
What does the Industrial Automation Strategy cover on industrial Automation Strategy for Manufacturing Leaders?
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing deciding which automation technologies to scale across production facilities this year. Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up.
What does the Industrial Automation Strategy cover on the situation this is built for?
Multiple facilities are running different automation pilots. Each with unique architectures, integration points, and skill dependencies. You are under pressure to standardize, but lack a consistent way to compare technical maturity, operational impact, or scalability. Leadership wants a roadmap. Your teams need clarity. Without a rigorous assessment method, you risk backing the wrong systems or stalling momentum.
Who is the Industrial Automation Strategy course for?
Director of Manufacturing Engineering in industrial manufacturing, overseeing automation deployment across multiple production sites, accountable for technology selection, scalability, and cross-plant consistency.
Who is the Industrial Automation Strategy course not for?
This is not for procurement specialists, junior automation engineers, or executives seeking high-level trends. It is for the technical leader who owns the automation roadmap and must make binding decisions this year.
What do you take away from the Industrial Automation Strategy course?
Evaluate automation systems using a consistent, plant-agnostic framework Identify which robotics platforms can scale across facilities Align engineering teams on integration standards and control architecture Eliminate redundant pilot programs and reduce integration rework Present a defensible automation roadmap to executive leadership.
What's included with your purchase?
12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters) Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access 30-day money-back guarantee.
What does the Industrial Automation Strategy cover on delivery and format?
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access. Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside ongoing automation projects. Total investment: 36 hours over 12 weeks.
Closely related courses: Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing Systems, Industrial Automation Leadership for Manufacturing, Industrial Valve Automation and Smart Manufacturing, Implementing Industry 40.
More answers: what you get with every course, refund policy, all help answers.
Page updated 2026-11-08.
The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
Industrial Automation Strategy for Manufacturing Leaders
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing deciding which automation technologies to scale across production facilities this year.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
Multiple facilities are running different automation pilots. Each with unique architectures, integration points, and skill dependencies. You are under pressure to standardize, but lack a consistent way to compare technical maturity, operational impact, or scalability. Leadership wants a roadmap. Your teams need clarity. Without a rigorous assessment method, you risk backing the wrong systems or stalling momentum.
Who this is for
Director of Manufacturing Engineering in industrial manufacturing, overseeing automation deployment across multiple production sites, accountable for technology selection, scalability, and cross-plant consistency.
Who this is not for
This is not for procurement specialists, junior automation engineers, or executives seeking high-level trends. It is for the technical leader who owns the automation roadmap and must make binding decisions this year.
What you walk away with
- Evaluate automation systems using a consistent, plant-agnostic framework
- Identify which robotics platforms can scale across facilities
- Align engineering teams on integration standards and control architecture
- Eliminate redundant pilot programs and reduce integration rework
- Present a defensible automation roadmap to executive leadership
How this maps to your situation
- Assessment of current automation pilots
- Cross-facility scalability analysis
- Control system standardization
- Executive roadmap development
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside ongoing automation projects. Total investment: 36 hours over 12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike vendor-led workshops or generic online courses, this program focuses exclusively on the internal decision-making process for scaling automation. It does not promote tools or products. Instead, it equips you with frameworks to evaluate, standardize, and govern automation across facilities using existing resources.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- Defining the scope of automation evaluation
- Mapping existing control system architectures
- Identifying integration points with MES and ERP
- Assessing robotics safety compliance standards
- Documenting current automation skill distribution
- Setting minimum uptime and availability thresholds
- Evaluating programmable logic controller compatibility
- Determining data logging and traceability needs
- Benchmarking changeover time across robot cells
- Establishing cybersecurity requirements for controllers
- Reviewing vendor documentation completeness
- Creating a standardized automation scoring rubric
- Classifying pilot programs by deployment stage
- Measuring mean time between failures in test cells
- Analyzing error log frequency and resolution time
- Validating robot path repeatability under load
- Reviewing operator intervention frequency
- Auditing backup and restore procedures for PLCs
- Assessing HMI usability across shift teams
- Testing emergency stop system reliability
- Evaluating teach pendant programming efficiency
- Documenting maintenance task duration and skill level
- Reviewing spare parts availability and lead times
- Determining whether the pilot meets OEE targets
- Comparing plant floor layouts for robot cell fit
- Analyzing utility requirements across locations
- Evaluating material handling compatibility
- Mapping existing conveyor and transfer systems
- Assessing environmental conditions for robotics
- Reviewing available floor load capacity
- Identifying facility-specific safety regulations
- Benchmarking compressed air and power quality
- Determining retraining needs for operations staff
- Evaluating local maintenance capability gaps
- Assessing spare I/O module availability
- Creating a site readiness scorecard
- Selecting a common PLC hardware platform
- Defining standard network topology for robot cells
- Establishing IP addressing conventions
- Creating a uniform HMI template library
- Standardizing alarm and event logging
- Defining recipe management structure
- Choosing a common robot programming language
- Documenting standard safety circuit design
- Setting version control for ladder logic
- Establishing backup and restore protocols
- Creating a central component library
- Enforcing naming conventions for tags
- Mapping production order triggers to robot start
- Defining work-in-process tracking events
- Configuring robot cell status reporting
- Validating material consumption data capture
- Synchronizing shift change data handoff
- Integrating quality inspection results
- Setting up downtime reason codes
- Automating batch record generation
- Testing alarm escalation to MES
- Validating recipe download to PLC
- Auditing data reconciliation processes
- Establishing MES-PLC communication standards
- Identifying key stakeholders by facility
- Creating a cross-plant automation council
- Developing standardized training curricula
- Scheduling phased deployment timelines
- Managing production downtime windows
- Establishing change freeze periods
- Documenting rollback procedures
- Coordinating maintenance team rotations
- Aligning with capital planning cycles
- Managing spare parts provisioning
- Tracking configuration drift over time
- Conducting post-deployment validation audits
- Measuring actual vs. designed cycle time
- Analyzing robot idle time causes
- Optimizing end-of-arm tooling changes
- Reducing material loading cycle duration
- Validating vision system accuracy rates
- Improving gripper reliability under variation
- Tuning motion paths for smooth operation
- Minimizing conveyor indexing delays
- Reducing PLC scan time bottlenecks
- Streamlining human-robot interaction points
- Balancing workload across multiple robots
- Implementing predictive maintenance triggers
- Conducting risk assessments for each robot cell
- Validating safety relay circuit design
- Testing light curtain response times
- Inspecting emergency stop button placement
- Reviewing lockout-tagout procedures
- Auditing safety PLC programming
- Verifying zone control configurations
- Assessing collaborative robot force limits
- Documenting safety training completion
- Updating safety manuals for new cells
- Scheduling recurring safety inspections
- Integrating safety events into reporting
- Assessing current engineering skill levels
- Defining required robotics certifications
- Creating internal ladder logic standards
- Establishing PLC code review process
- Developing troubleshooting playbooks
- Building simulation testing environment
- Setting up version control for automation code
- Creating knowledge transfer sessions
- Designing onboarding for new engineers
- Tracking time spent on automation support
- Developing escalation paths for failures
- Measuring mean time to repair trends
- Defining OEE calculation for robot cells
- Setting up real-time performance dashboards
- Validating data collection accuracy
- Establishing baseline availability rates
- Tracking unplanned downtime causes
- Measuring first-pass yield in automation
- Analyzing rework rates post-automation
- Benchmarking throughput against targets
- Calculating cost per automated unit
- Assessing labor hour reduction claims
- Reporting automation ROI to leadership
- Conducting quarterly performance reviews
- Tracking PLC hardware end-of-life dates
- Monitoring software support expiration
- Identifying legacy communication protocols
- Assessing spare parts shelf life
- Planning for control system migrations
- Evaluating backward compatibility needs
- Budgeting for incremental upgrades
- Documenting as-found conditions
- Creating technology watch list
- Aligning refresh cycles with capital plan
- Testing new firmware in sandbox
- Managing firmware version drift
- Compiling site readiness assessments
- Prioritizing facilities for rollout
- Estimating capital and labor costs
- Mapping dependencies across projects
- Creating visual rollout timeline
- Defining success metrics for leadership
- Anticipating operational disruptions
- Aligning with product launch schedules
- Securing cross-functional approvals
- Presenting risk mitigation strategies
- Documenting assumptions and constraints
- Establishing governance for roadmap updates
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.