A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for AI/ML Engineering Leaders in Ad-Tech
A proven system to align business continuity planning with AI infrastructure scale and stakeholder expectations
The situation this course is for
ML engineering leaders face growing scrutiny on system uptime and disaster response, but current business impact assessments lack standardization, lead to rework, and delay deployment cycles. Without a structured framework, teams default to ad-hoc narratives that fail under cross-functional review.
Who this is for
Senior AI/ML engineering leader in ad-tech at a major platform, responsible for system reliability, incident response, and cross-functional coordination under pressure
Who this is not for
Individual contributors without cross-team influence, non-technical managers, or teams focused solely on model accuracy without operational scale concerns
What you walk away with
- Produce stakeholder-validated business impact assessments in under 6 hours
- Establish clear escalation paths for AI system outages aligned with ISO 22301
- Lead resilience conversations with product and infrastructure peers using standardized criteria
- Reduce rework in continuity planning cycles by using repeatable templates
- Position yourself as the internal reference for AI system resilience decisions
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining business continuity in the context of AI system failures
- Mapping ISO 22301 clauses to ad-tech operational realities
- Understanding the role of the ML engineering leader in resilience planning
- Differentiating availability, recoverability, and fault tolerance
- Integrating continuity planning into model deployment pipelines
- Aligning with Meta-level SRE and infrastructure teams
- Key terminology: BCM, BIA, RTO, RPO in AI contexts
- How ISO 22301 complements other standards like SOC 2 and ISO 27001
- Common misconceptions about resilience in AI systems
- Setting expectations with non-technical stakeholders
- Documenting assumptions in high-velocity environments
- Building a living continuity framework instead of a static document
- Identifying core AI services in ad delivery pipelines
- Mapping data dependencies for training and inference
- Engaging product and sales teams for impact input
- Quantifying financial impact of model downtime
- Assessing reputational risk from degraded personalization
- Setting RTOs and RPOs for different model types
- Handling model drift as a continuity concern
- Documenting cascading failures across services
- Using historical outage data to inform thresholds
- Validating BIA findings with infrastructure teams
- Creating visual impact heatmaps for leadership
- Avoiding over-scoping and maintaining focus
- Common threat categories for AI platforms
- Identifying single points of failure in model serving
- Assessing data pipeline vulnerabilities
- Evaluating third-party dependencies and vendor risks
- Considering adversarial attacks and data poisoning
- Rating likelihood and impact of AI-specific threats
- Involving security and privacy teams in risk workshops
- Linking risk findings to control objectives
- Creating risk registers with traceable logic
- Prioritizing risks with executive input
- Documenting risk treatment strategies
- Maintaining risk assessments through model updates
- Implementing redundancy for model serving endpoints
- Designing fallback mechanisms for degraded operation
- Automating failover detection and response
- Creating data backup and restoration procedures
- Establishing model version rollback protocols
- Documenting manual intervention playbooks
- Integrating monitoring with incident management
- Defining thresholds for automatic alerts
- Securing access to recovery environments
- Validating control effectiveness through testing
- Balancing security with developer velocity
- Aligning controls with existing Meta engineering standards
- Defining activation triggers for AI incident response
- Establishing response team roles and responsibilities
- Creating communication templates for internal stakeholders
- Drafting public-facing statements for model issues
- Coordinating with legal and PR teams in crises
- Documenting incident timelines and decisions
- Integrating with Meta’s centralized incident management
- Conducting post-mortems with learning focus
- Updating runbooks based on incident findings
- Training team members on response protocols
- Running tabletop exercises for AI scenarios
- Maintaining response readiness across rotations
- Designing test scenarios for model degradation
- Conducting tabletop exercises with cross-functional teams
- Planning technical failover tests during maintenance windows
- Measuring test success against recovery objectives
- Documenting test findings and action items
- Involving external auditors in validation
- Adjusting plans based on test results
- Creating evidence packages for compliance reviews
- Scheduling regular test cycles
- Integrating test results into risk assessments
- Communicating test outcomes to leadership
- Maintaining test records for audit readiness
- Identifying key stakeholders in continuity planning
- Translating technical risks into business terms
- Setting realistic expectations for system availability
- Negotiating RTO and RPO agreements
- Presenting BIA findings to non-technical leaders
- Building trust through transparency
- Handling conflicting stakeholder priorities
- Creating executive summaries from technical data
- Maintaining engagement through regular updates
- Documenting alignment and disagreements
- Using ISO 22301 as a neutral reference point
- Positioning resilience as enabler, not blocker
- Structuring the business continuity policy document
- Creating living BIA and risk assessment records
- Maintaining evidence of stakeholder involvement
- Documenting control design and implementation
- Organizing test results and action tracking
- Using version control for continuity artifacts
- Linking documentation to Meta’s internal systems
- Creating executive dashboards for status
- Preparing for internal and external audits
- Defining document ownership and review cycles
- Balancing completeness with readability
- Archiving outdated versions securely
- Incorporating BIA into model design phase
- Adding resilience checks to CI/CD pipelines
- Integrating with Meta’s internal monitoring tools
- Automating evidence collection for controls
- Updating documentation during model refresh
- Training new team members on procedures
- Linking incident response to existing on-call
- Aligning with platform-wide SRE standards
- Using feature flags for controlled recovery
- Establishing review gates for high-impact models
- Measuring team adherence to continuity practices
- Feedback loops from operations to planning
- Scheduling regular plan reviews
- Triggering updates after major incidents
- Incorporating lessons from post-mortems
- Tracking changes in system architecture
- Updating BIA with new product requirements
- Reassessing risk landscape annually
- Measuring effectiveness of improvements
- Engaging leadership in review cycles
- Benchmarking against industry practices
- Identifying innovation opportunities
- Documenting review outcomes
- Planning for future scalability
- Creating standardized templates for new models
- Establishing center of excellence practices
- Training peer engineering leads
- Developing audit playbooks for reviewers
- Implementing centralized dashboards
- Sharing best practices across teams
- Handling exceptions and edge cases
- Maintaining consistency with autonomy
- Onboarding new product areas
- Evolving standards with technical maturity
- Measuring adoption across the organization
- Recognizing team achievements
- Building credibility through consistent delivery
- Contributing to cross-functional standards
- Mentoring other engineering leaders
- Presenting successes at technical forums
- Influencing platform-level decisions
- Advising on M&A technical integration
- Representing Meta in industry discussions
- Developing thought leadership content
- Guiding junior staff on resilience thinking
- Balancing innovation with responsibility
- Earning executive recognition
- Shaping the future of AI operations
How this maps to your situation
- AI/ML Engineering Manager
- ad-tech environment
- high-availability systems
- cross-functional stakeholder alignment
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: 90 minutes of focused learning, designed to be consumed in one Sunday morning with immediate applicability to current work.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic ISO 22301 training, this course is tailored to AI/ML engineering leaders in ad-tech, focusing on real-world decisions, stakeholder dynamics, and integration with existing Meta engineering practices.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.