A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for GenAI Product Leaders in High-Pressure Tech Environments
Build a self-reinforcing cycle of delivery credibility and stakeholder trust
The situation this course is for
AI product teams are increasingly held accountable for delivery resilience, but final-cycle validation bottlenecks, especially around business continuity planning and incident response alignment, still delay launches and dilute stakeholder trust. The cost isn't just time; it's credibility erosion on repeat.
Who this is for
Senior AI product leader at a high-growth tech firm, accountable for on-time, compliant GenAI releases under tight scrutiny and cross-functional dependencies
Who this is not for
Junior PMs, non-product roles in AI, or teams focused solely on model development without delivery ownership
What you walk away with
- A reusable, auditable launch validation package for GenAI releases
- Faster cross-functional alignment on continuity requirements
- Fewer last-minute changes during final review windows
- Increased trust from engineering and compliance partners
- A growing library of delivery artifacts that accelerate future cycles
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- How ISO 22301 applies to machine learning infrastructure
- Key differences between traditional IT continuity and AI system resilience
- Mapping GenAI failure modes to business impact scenarios
- The role of product management in continuity planning
- Integrating ISO 22301 requirements into AI product specs
- Common gaps in AI teams’ current continuity posture
- Why AI systems fail differently under stress
- Case study: GenAI outage at a major platform
- Stakeholder expectations during AI service disruption
- Aligning incident response with model versioning
- Documenting recovery time objectives for AI features
- Translating compliance needs into engineering tasks
- Defining criticality for GenAI features versus traditional services
- Identifying dependent teams and systems in the AI stack
- Quantifying user impact of GenAI downtime
- Setting realistic recovery time and point objectives
- Involving legal and trust teams in BIA scoping
- Documenting assumptions for AI model reinitialization
- Prioritizing workloads by revenue, engagement, and compliance
- Validating BIA inputs with engineering leads
- Handling dynamic workloads with variable inference demand
- Updating BIA for new model releases
- Linking BIA outcomes to continuity strategy
- Common pitfalls in AI-specific BIA development
- Architectural options for GenAI continuity
- Fallback strategies for model serving layers
- Data pipeline redundancy for training and inference
- Model checkpointing and warm restart protocols
- Cross-region deployment considerations
- Caching strategies during partial outages
- Human-in-the-loop escalation paths
- Version rollback playbooks for AI models
- Monitoring continuity readiness in production
- Integrating continuity into CI/CD pipelines
- Cost-benefit analysis of redundancy levels
- Documenting strategy decisions for audit
- Defining incident severity levels for AI services
- Role assignments during AI outages
- Communication protocols with internal teams
- External messaging strategy during AI downtime
- Escalation paths for model drift incidents
- Playbooks for data poisoning or prompt injection
- Coordinating with security and legal teams
- Post-incident review processes
- Documenting response actions for compliance
- Simulating AI incident scenarios
- Integrating IR plans with existing NOC workflows
- Maintaining plan currency across model updates
- Mapping ISO 22301 clauses to product milestones
- Balancing speed and resilience in sprint planning
- Incorporating continuity into feature definition
- Working with engineering to scope recovery needs
- Prioritizing technical debt related to continuity
- Tracking compliance readiness in Jira
- Reporting continuity status to leadership
- Handling roadmap changes mid-cycle
- Aligning with platform-wide resilience goals
- Documenting decisions for audit trails
- Measuring progress on continuity deliverables
- Reducing last-minute compliance work
- Choosing appropriate test scenarios for AI systems
- Tabletop exercises for model degradation events
- Technical failover tests for inference pipelines
- Involving cross-functional teams in testing
- Measuring test effectiveness with clear metrics
- Documenting test results for auditors
- Addressing gaps identified in tests
- Scheduling regular test cycles
- Scaling test complexity over time
- Avoiding disruptive testing in production
- Integrating test feedback into product updates
- Building stakeholder confidence through testing
- Required documents under ISO 22301 for AI teams
- Writing policies that reflect real GenAI practices
- Creating evidence of continuity planning
- Maintaining version control for compliance docs
- Linking documentation to product artifacts
- Demonstrating leadership commitment
- Showing continuous improvement in documentation
- Preparing for internal and external audits
- Using automation to maintain documentation
- Avoiding boilerplate compliance language
- Tailoring documentation to AI use cases
- Common documentation gaps in AI teams
- Mapping vendor dependencies in GenAI pipelines
- Assessing vendor continuity capabilities
- Contractual requirements for vendor resilience
- Monitoring vendor performance and uptime
- Fallback strategies for third-party API failures
- Managing model dependencies on external providers
- Incident coordination with vendors
- Auditing vendor compliance claims
- Reducing single points of failure
- Diversifying vendor relationships
- Documenting vendor risk decisions
- Communicating vendor risks to stakeholders
- Identifying training needs by role
- Developing role-specific continuity training
- Onboarding new team members
- Conducting regular refresher sessions
- Using real incidents as training material
- Measuring training effectiveness
- Documenting training completion
- Integrating training into on-call rotations
- Creating accessible training resources
- Updating training for new system changes
- Engaging leadership in training
- Avoiding training fatigue in fast-moving teams
- Key metrics for GenAI system resilience
- Tracking recovery time and success rates
- Measuring test participation and results
- Reporting on continuity posture to leadership
- Benchmarking against industry standards
- Using dashboards for real-time visibility
- Identifying trends in incident data
- Reporting to compliance and audit teams
- Demonstrating continuous improvement
- Avoiding vanity metrics
- Aligning metrics with business goals
- Documenting performance for auditors
- Change management for continuity plans
- Assessing impact of new models on continuity
- Updating documentation for model changes
- Revalidating plans after major updates
- Managing technical debt in continuity
- Scaling compliance practices with team growth
- Handling mergers or reorganizations
- Responding to audit findings
- Integrating lessons from incidents
- Staying current with ISO 22301 updates
- Continuous improvement cycles
- Documenting compliance evolution
- Identifying common patterns across GenAI products
- Creating reusable continuity templates
- Standardizing documentation formats
- Sharing lessons across teams
- Establishing center of excellence practices
- Coordinating cross-product incident response
- Managing dependencies between AI systems
- Scaling testing programs
- Developing organization-wide metrics
- Maintaining consistency with autonomy
- Reducing duplication of effort
- Documenting portfolio-level continuity
How this maps to your situation
- Q3 GenAI release cycle under compliance scrutiny
- Cross-functional alignment on continuity standards
- Efficiency pressure to reduce last-minute validation
- Growing stakeholder expectations for AI reliability
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per week over six weeks, designed to fit around product delivery cycles.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic ISO 22301 courses, this program is tailored to GenAI product leaders, focusing on real-world delivery challenges rather than theoretical compliance. It provides actionable templates and examples specific to AI infrastructure, not generic IT continuity frameworks.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.