A tailored course, built for your situation
Own the ISO 42001 AI Governance Design End to End
A 12-module program to lead AI governance decisions in your current role
Who this is for
Senior BI and data governance practitioners implementing AI oversight frameworks in global services firms
Who this is not for
Entry-level analysts, project coordinators, or team members without direct input into control design or governance documentation
What you walk away with
- Lead ISO 42001 control mapping without escalation
- Produce audit-ready governance documentation in half the time
- Make confident design decisions on scope boundaries and exclusions
- Own the vendor assessment track within AI governance deployments
- Deliver stakeholder-aligned SoA (Statement of Applicability) drafts on first iteration
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 42001 solves that other standards don’t
- Core terms every practitioner must know
- AI types in scope under Annex A
- Relationship to BI and data warehousing
- How Annex A controls differ from ISO 27001
- When to apply human oversight clauses
- Mapping data lineage to control A.8.1
- Using A.4.2 for AI policy ownership
- Integrating A.5.1 into model documentation
- Control A.6.3 for third-party AI tools
- Defining 'high-risk' AI per A.7.1
- Auditor expectations for clause 4.1
- Start with data source types
- Exclude non-AI automation cleanly
- Using deployment purpose to set limits
- How model update frequency affects scope
- Documenting boundary rationale
- Handling edge cases like chatbots
- Stakeholder alignment on exclusions
- Preventing scope creep in reviews
- Mapping boundary to control A.4.1
- Boundary artifacts for audit trail
- When to involve legal vs technical teams
- Common boundary mistakes to avoid
- Defining process owner for A.4
- Who owns model validation reports
- Data provider responsibilities
- Vendor oversight lead role
- Legal input timing and scope
- Privacy officer integration points
- Escalation path for disagreements
- Sign-off sequence for documentation
- Maintaining role clarity in matrix orgs
- Updating roles during team changes
- Documenting role decisions
- Avoiding consensus paralysis
- Baseline controls all deployments need
- High-risk AI additional controls
- Exclusion criteria per control
- Documenting rationale clearly
- Using architecture diagrams as proof
- When to include A.8.4 monitoring
- Handling model drift detection
- Validating exclusion with evidence
- Cross-linking to existing SOC 2 controls
- Common auditor pushbacks and replies
- Versioning control decisions
- Template for control justification log
- SoA structure best practices
- Presenting in-scope controls
- Formatting exclusion statements
- Referencing implementation evidence
- Using clear language for non-experts
- Version control for SoA updates
- Getting sign-off without delays
- Aligning SoA with audit plan
- Common SoA flaws to avoid
- How often to update the SoA
- SoA vs implementation plan
- Template walkthrough
- Phases of AI lifecycle per standard
- Aligning model development steps
- Version control integration
- Model validation checkpoints
- Retirement and deprecation process
- Handling model updates
- Data drift monitoring triggers
- Logging for auditability
- Using CI/CD pipelines as evidence
- Mapping to control A.8.2
- Lifecycle documentation structure
- Common gaps in lifecycle records
- Classifying third-party AI usage
- Required vendor documentation
- Assessing vendor ISO 42001 claims
- Contractual clauses to demand
- Onboarding process for AI tools
- Ongoing monitoring approach
- Incident response with vendors
- Exit strategies for non-compliant tools
- Mapping to control A.6.3
- Common vendor red flags
- Evidence collection from vendors
- Vendor exception process
- Defining oversight triggers
- Setting thresholds for intervention
- Role clarity for human reviewers
- Logging oversight actions
- Training requirements for reviewers
- Escalation paths for edge cases
- Auditor expectations for oversight
- Common missteps in oversight logs
- Balancing automation and control
- Using dashboards for oversight
- Documentation structure
- Testing oversight process
- Aligning data lineage with ISO 42001
- Mapping data quality checks
- PII handling per control A.5.3
- Data retention policies
- Cross-referencing with GDPR
- Data access logging
- Handling synthetic data
- Data drift detection process
- Vendor data handling oversight
- Documenting data decisions
- Common gaps in data evidence
- Template for data governance map
- Frequency of internal checks
- Automating evidence collection
- Assigning review owners
- Tracking findings to closure
- Using control dashboards
- Aligning with SOC 2 cycles
- Preparing for external audit
- Common audit findings and fixes
- Updating documentation post-audit
- Maintaining version history
- Audit communication plan
- Template for audit response
- Change approval workflow
- Impact assessment for updates
- Version control integration
- Re-validation requirements
- Stakeholder notification
- Documentation update process
- Rollback planning
- Emergency change path
- Auditor expectations for changes
- Common change gaps
- Linking to CI/CD
- Change log template
- Customising control mapping
- Adapting SoA template
- Integrating with existing tools
- Rolling out to team members
- Training junior staff
- Tracking compliance status
- Reporting progress to leadership
- Updating for new regulations
- Lessons from real deployments
- Avoiding rework traps
- Scaling beyond one project
- Your next governance initiative
How this maps to your situation
- When starting a new AI governance project
- During vendor selection for AI tools
- Preparing for internal audit
- Scaling governance across multiple models
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3-4 hours per module, designed for practitioners shipping real work. Total investment: ~36-48 hours over 12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses exclusively on ISO 42001 in data and analytics environments, with templates based on actual deployments in global services firms. No other course offers this level of role-specific detail for BI specialists leading governance.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.