The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
Leading AI Agents and Automation for Senior Leaders
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing the routing, chasing and re-keying between systems that nobody owns.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
Work gets stuck between systems no one owns. Tasks fall through cracks. People re-enter data, re-send requests, re-explain context. You’re the one who notices. You’re the one blamed. You’re the one with no mandate to fix it. The work is invisible until it fails. Now AI agents promise to automate — but no one knows who decides what runs, where, and why.
Who this is for
Senior leaders responsible for cross-system workflows that require coordination, data movement, and decision-making across siloed teams and platforms.
Who this is not for
Individual contributors building AI tools, technical founders, or teams focused only on implementing vendor solutions without strategic oversight.
What you walk away with
- Map the full lifecycle of agent-driven work across systems
- Assess automation readiness across departments and processes
- Define ownership models for workflows no single team controls
- Prioritize changes based on risk, cost, and scalability
- Lead decisions about automation without relying on technical specialists
How this maps to your situation
- Current state assessment
- Ownership and accountability
- Readiness evaluation
- Future state design
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 to 5 hours per module, designed to be completed over 12 weeks with reflection and application built into each chapter.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic process improvement courses or technical AI training, this course is built for senior leaders who own complex, cross-system work but lack direct control over teams or tools. It focuses on observation, decision-making, and governance — not coding, configuration, or vendor selection.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- Identifying recurring tasks that require manual intervention
- Mapping data movement across disconnected systems
- Recognizing where employees re-enter the same information
- Tracking how requests get lost between departments
- Observing patterns in follow-up and escalation
- Documenting workarounds used to bypass system gaps
- Noting where context is lost during handoffs
- Analyzing time spent on coordination versus execution
- Pinpointing where approvals create bottlenecks
- Evaluating reliance on email and messaging for task routing
- Assessing consistency of data across platforms
- Creating a timeline of a single work item from start to close
- Distinguishing between functional and system ownership
- Identifying where responsibility is shared or undefined
- Analyzing escalation paths when things go wrong
- Defining decision rights for cross-team workflows
- Mapping stakeholders by influence and authority
- Assessing how handoffs are documented or assumed
- Clarifying roles in hybrid human-agent processes
- Establishing accountability for data accuracy
- Determining who owns resolution when automation fails
- Reviewing existing service-level agreements
- Creating a RACI model for multi-system workflows
- Setting expectations for response times and outcomes
- Evaluating process maturity before automation
- Measuring variability in task execution
- Identifying repeatable decisions suitable for delegation
- Assessing data quality and availability
- Determining system accessibility for integration
- Reviewing error rates in current manual steps
- Analyzing frequency and volume of tasks
- Classifying tasks by risk and compliance impact
- Determining human oversight requirements
- Evaluating team capacity to support change
- Assessing tolerance for automation failures
- Creating a readiness scorecard for each workflow
- Identifying existing AI-driven notifications and alerts
- Tracking automated suggestions in business software
- Observing bot participation in communication channels
- Documenting AI-generated summaries of meetings or emails
- Noting instances of predictive routing in ticketing systems
- Analyzing AI-influenced prioritization of tasks
- Reviewing automated report generation and distribution
- Identifying AI-based data validation steps
- Mapping AI agents that escalate or reassign work
- Assessing reliance on AI for content creation
- Evaluating AI interpretation of unstructured input
- Cataloging AI agents operating without formal oversight
- Listing all systems involved in core workflows
- Identifying data fields transferred between platforms
- Mapping transformation rules during data transfer
- Noting where manual reconciliation is required
- Assessing frequency and timing of data syncs
- Documenting API usage and limitations
- Identifying duplicate data entry points
- Analyzing data loss during system transitions
- Reviewing error handling in failed transfers
- Evaluating schema mismatches across systems
- Tracking latency in cross-system updates
- Assessing security controls on data movement
- Noting individuals who act as human routers
- Identifying shadow systems like spreadsheets and emails
- Mapping undocumented approval chains
- Tracking reliance on personal knowledge
- Observing workarounds for access restrictions
- Documenting tribal knowledge in task execution
- Identifying single points of failure in coordination
- Analyzing informal escalation paths
- Reviewing unofficial data sources
- Assessing reliance on temporary fixes
- Noting undocumented integrations
- Evaluating ad hoc communication channels
- Identifying decisions made without audit trail
- Assessing transparency of AI reasoning
- Evaluating bias in automated recommendations
- Reviewing compliance with data handling rules
- Mapping fallback procedures during outages
- Assessing change management for agent updates
- Identifying lack of version control in workflows
- Evaluating access controls for AI agents
- Reviewing logging and monitoring capabilities
- Assessing impact of incorrect automation on downstream steps
- Evaluating rework costs when agents fail
- Determining accountability for automated errors
- Defining handoff points between humans and agents
- Establishing rules for agent autonomy levels
- Setting thresholds for human review
- Designing feedback loops for agent learning
- Creating escalation protocols for edge cases
- Determining training requirements for staff
- Designing dashboards for agent performance
- Setting expectations for agent response times
- Defining roles in mixed-initiative workflows
- Establishing review cycles for agent output
- Creating documentation standards for agent actions
- Designing onboarding for new agent capabilities
- Defining end-to-end success criteria for workflows
- Establishing data validation rules at each stage
- Creating unique identifiers for work items
- Implementing tracking across systems
- Designing alerts for stalled or missing steps
- Standardizing status definitions across teams
- Implementing audit trails for all changes
- Creating reconciliation procedures for discrepancies
- Enforcing data ownership at each stage
- Designing rollback procedures for failed automation
- Establishing metrics for workflow health
- Implementing periodic integrity checks
- Assessing potential time savings per process
- Estimating error reduction from automation
- Evaluating cost of delay for improvements
- Assessing team capacity for change adoption
- Identifying quick wins with high visibility
- Mapping dependencies between automation opportunities
- Prioritizing based on risk exposure
- Aligning initiatives with strategic goals
- Evaluating cross-functional benefits
- Assessing vendor independence of solutions
- Creating a sequencing plan for implementation
- Building a business case for leadership approval
- Defining roles in automation governance
- Creating a register of active AI agents
- Establishing change approval processes
- Setting standards for agent documentation
- Implementing monitoring for unintended behavior
- Creating incident response plans
- Establishing review cycles for agent performance
- Defining decommissioning procedures
- Enforcing security and access policies
- Creating transparency for stakeholders
- Establishing feedback mechanisms from users
- Reviewing ethical implications of automation
- Defining success metrics for each initiative
- Setting timelines for pilot and rollout
- Assigning owners for each phase
- Identifying required resources and support
- Creating communication plans for teams
- Developing training materials for new workflows
- Establishing feedback collection during testing
- Designing phased deployment schedules
- Building monitoring into early stages
- Creating documentation for future maintenance
- Scheduling post-implementation reviews
- Planning for continuous improvement cycles
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.