The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
Leading Drug Discovery Informatics in the AI Era
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing Drug discovery and research informatics.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
Discovery teams demand real-time data access, reproducible analytics, and seamless integration across wet and dry labs. Legacy architectures buckle under new data volumes. Experimental workflows evolve faster than informatics can adapt. You are held accountable for outcomes, yet lack authority over key decisions. The tools change, but the core work—orchestrating data, people, and decisions—remains yours to own.
Who this is for
Head of Research Informatics in a biotech or pharma organization, responsible for data strategy, infrastructure, and analytics support across discovery programs.
Who this is not for
This is not for IT managers focused on enterprise systems, nor for computational scientists building isolated models. It is for those who own the end-to-end informatics function in drug discovery.
What you walk away with
- Map where your informatics function creates or loses value in discovery workflows
- Identify decision rights and accountabilities across data, tools, and teams
- Assess the resilience of your current data architecture under increasing experimental complexity
- Define your role in hybrid discovery models blending automation and human insight
- Build a tailored action plan to evolve your function with confidence
How this maps to your situation
- Diagnose current state
- Understand system dynamics
- Identify leverage points
- Plan strategic evolution
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed at your pace over 8-12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike vendor-specific training or generic data science courses, this program focuses exclusively on the strategic and operational realities of leading drug discovery informatics functions.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- How discovery velocity redefines informatics responsibilities
- Mapping the changing expectations of discovery scientists
- Identifying hidden bottlenecks in data request workflows
- Assessing the cost of delayed data access in projects
- Recognizing when informatics becomes a gating factor
- Evaluating the balance between standardization and flexibility
- Understanding how experimental design drives data needs
- Tracking the expansion of data types in discovery
- Diagnosing miscommunication between wet and dry labs
- Clarifying ownership of data quality and curation
- Measuring the impact of informatics on project timelines
- Defining success from the perspective of discovery teams
- Charting data flows from bench to analysis pipeline
- Identifying key decision points in hit identification
- Tracing ownership of data models across teams
- Mapping dependencies between assay development and analytics
- Documenting handoffs between experimental and computational teams
- Visualizing data lineage in lead optimization workflows
- Locating decision logs for compound selection meetings
- Tracking metadata requirements across screening campaigns
- Identifying integration points for automated platforms
- Assessing data format compatibility across instruments
- Evaluating version control for analysis scripts
- Connecting data provenance to regulatory readiness
- Assessing scalability of data storage under high-throughput screening
- Evaluating query performance during SAR analysis
- Identifying single points of failure in data pipelines
- Reviewing data schema adaptability for new modalities
- Measuring latency in data availability after experiments
- Auditing access controls for sensitive compound data
- Testing reproducibility of analysis environments
- Evaluating metadata capture completeness in raw data
- Diagnosing data silos between therapeutic areas
- Assessing compatibility with federated analysis models
- Reviewing backup and recovery procedures for critical datasets
- Evaluating long-term preservation of discovery data
- Observing compound prioritization meetings for data needs
- Mapping data use in structure-activity relationship discussions
- Identifying ad hoc data manipulation practices in teams
- Documenting workarounds for missing informatics services
- Assessing integration of predictive models into decision making
- Tracking how scientists validate computational suggestions
- Evaluating timing of data delivery relative to project gates
- Identifying unmet needs in visualization tools
- Understanding preferences for data access interfaces
- Measuring time spent on data preparation versus analysis
- Documenting feedback loops for model performance
- Assessing adoption barriers for new informatics tools
- Mapping approval workflows for new data sources
- Identifying who decides on data classification levels
- Documenting change management for data models
- Reviewing escalation paths for data quality issues
- Assessing participation in cross-functional data councils
- Evaluating enforcement of metadata standards
- Tracking resolution of data ownership disputes
- Measuring compliance with data retention policies
- Auditing access revocation after team changes
- Reviewing processes for onboarding new collaborators
- Assessing documentation practices for data dictionaries
- Evaluating consistency in compound naming conventions
- Assessing availability of curated datasets for modeling
- Evaluating speed of feature engineering pipelines
- Measuring reusability of analysis workflows
- Identifying barriers to sharing analytical methods
- Tracking usage of self-service analytics platforms
- Assessing documentation quality for analytical models
- Evaluating reproducibility of published results
- Measuring time to deploy new analytical methods
- Reviewing validation procedures for predictive models
- Assessing integration of external data sources
- Evaluating support for iterative model refinement
- Documenting version control for analytical outputs
- Mapping decision authority in automated experimentation
- Identifying human oversight points in self-driving labs
- Assessing data feedback loops from robotic platforms
- Evaluating error handling in autonomous workflows
- Tracking intervention frequency by experimental scientists
- Documenting edge cases not handled by automation
- Reviewing data quality thresholds for automated processing
- Assessing calibration requirements for integrated systems
- Measuring throughput gains from hybrid workflows
- Evaluating training needs for hybrid team members
- Identifying communication gaps in mixed teams
- Assessing safety protocols for autonomous operations
- Assessing modularity of current data processing workflows
- Evaluating ease of incorporating new data types
- Measuring time to deploy pipeline updates
- Reviewing testing procedures for data transformations
- Assessing monitoring coverage for pipeline health
- Identifying failure recovery mechanisms
- Evaluating data validation rules at ingestion
- Measuring data drift detection capabilities
- Reviewing audit trails for pipeline changes
- Assessing scalability of batch processing jobs
- Evaluating containerization of analytical steps
- Documenting dependencies between pipeline components
- Mapping communication channels between teams
- Identifying decision rights in joint initiatives
- Assessing meeting structures for cross-team alignment
- Evaluating shared documentation practices
- Measuring response times to inter-team requests
- Reviewing conflict resolution mechanisms
- Assessing joint problem-solving effectiveness
- Evaluating shared understanding of project goals
- Documenting information handoff procedures
- Measuring consistency in terminology across teams
- Assessing participation in cross-functional retrospectives
- Reviewing recognition of collaborative contributions
- Mapping skills against current project requirements
- Identifying knowledge silos within the team
- Assessing onboarding effectiveness for new members
- Evaluating mentorship opportunities
- Measuring cross-training completion rates
- Reviewing role clarity in team charters
- Assessing workload distribution across specialists
- Evaluating response capacity during peak demand
- Documenting career development conversations
- Reviewing performance evaluation criteria
- Assessing retention of critical expertise
- Measuring engagement in continuous learning
- Identifying key performance indicators for data teams
- Measuring time saved through automated reporting
- Assessing reduction in data request turnaround time
- Evaluating adoption rates of standardized tools
- Measuring reuse of analytical workflows
- Tracking reduction in data reconciliation efforts
- Assessing improvements in data findability
- Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction with services
- Measuring impact on compound selection quality
- Reviewing cost avoidance from error reduction
- Assessing contribution to publication readiness
- Documenting informatics contributions to project milestones
- Prioritizing changes based on discovery impact
- Identifying quick wins in workflow optimization
- Assessing resource requirements for major initiatives
- Mapping stakeholder alignment for proposed changes
- Evaluating risk tolerance for architectural changes
- Defining success metrics for transformation efforts
- Sequencing initiatives based on dependencies
- Building communication plan for organizational change
- Identifying pilot projects for new approaches
- Establishing feedback mechanisms for iteration
- Documenting assumptions underlying the roadmap
- Preparing executive summary for leadership review
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.