The Executive Diagnostic and Governance Toolkit
Mastering Accounting Close and Reconciliation
Score your own function red, amber or green, find out which part is weakest, and walk into the next budget round able to defend what you want to fix. Built for leaders reviewing month-end close: matching, accruals, variance explanations, and the same schedule rebuilt monthly.
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
| 1 |
You stop guessing where you stand. You finish with a score, not an opinion: every part of your function rated red, amber or green, with the weakest ranked first. Evidence: a Quick Scan for the shape of it, then seven domain assessments of 30 scored questions each, 210 in all, rolled into one scorecard, plus a maturity radar and a current-versus-target gap analysis. |
| 2 |
You can defend the decision. You walk into the budget round with the gap named, the owner named and done defined, instead of a case built on instinct. Evidence: project charter, scope statement, RACI, requirements traceability and work breakdown structure, pre-filled in your domain's language. |
| 3 |
The work actually moves. The month after the decision is already built, so nothing stalls waiting for someone to design a form. Evidence: more than 60 project templates across all five PMBOK process groups, plus runbooks, SOPs, a KPI framework, audit checklists and a risk matrix. 55 to 65 files in total. |
| 4 |
You use it the day it lands. No blank templates to interpret. Every workbook opens with what it is, who uses it, when, how, a 1 to 5 scoring guide, what good looks like, and a worked example you delete and type over. |
The situation this is built for
The month-end close is a cycle of repetition. Invoices are matched, accruals estimated, intercompany reconciliations redone, and variance analyses rewritten. Each month, the same schedules are reconstructed from scratch. The process is manual, time-consuming, and prone to error. When leadership asks for faster close or deeper insights, the response is more headcount—not better process. You know the work is stuck. But you also know that change cannot come from a vendor demo. It starts with understanding what is working, what is not, and where you can act.
Who this is for
Financial Controller in a growing organization where month-end close is manual, repetitive, and resistant to improvement. They own the close package, lead the reconciliation process, and are accountable for accurate, timely financials.
Who this is not for
This is not for staff accountants focused on data entry, nor for CFOs seeking vendor evaluations. It is for the person in the middle who owns the close process and wants to improve it without outsourcing or automation hype.
What you walk away with
- Assess the maturity of your reconciliation workflows
- Identify which accruals are repeatable and which are not
- Reduce time spent on variance explanations by 30%
- Build a close package that stands up to audit scrutiny
- Decide what to change—and what to stop doing
How this maps to your situation
- You are rebuilding the same reconciliations every month
- You spend more time explaining variances than fixing causes
- Your close calendar is dictated by the slowest task
- You are accountable for clean financials but lack control over inputs
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed to be completed alongside your close cycle. Most learners finish in 8 to 12 weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic process improvement courses, this is specific to the accounting close. It does not teach accounting basics or promote software. It focuses on the actual work—reconciliations, accruals, variances, and controls—so you can assess and act with confidence.
Also included: the full course, for when you want the reasoning behind a finding (12 modules, 144 chapters)
Depth reference. The diagnostic and the templates stand on their own; this is what to read when you want the reasoning behind a finding.
- List all ledgers requiring monthly reconciliation
- Map the sequence of close activities from day one
- Identify who performs each reconciliation task
- Document the tools used for each close step
- Trace how journal entries flow to the general ledger
- Record the frequency of recurring manual adjustments
- Pinpoint where spreadsheets are recreated each month
- Log the number of systems feeding the close
- Define the handoff points between teams
- Capture the approval hierarchy for journal entries
- Note the timing of external data dependencies
- Highlight tasks done only during audit season
- Separate balance sheet reconciliations from P&L reviews
- Classify reconciliations as recurring or event-driven
- Distinguish system-generated from manual reconciliations
- Group reconciliations by account type and risk level
- Identify which reconciliations require supporting documents
- Determine which reconciliations are policy-mandated
- Tag reconciliations with high judgment components
- Label reconciliations dependent on external parties
- Flag reconciliations requiring intercompany alignment
- Categorize reconciliations by materiality thresholds
- Track which reconciliations are signed off digitally
- List reconciliations subject to external audit review
- List all recurring accruals by account code
- Document the source data for each accrual
- Identify the person responsible for each estimate
- Review the rationale behind variable accruals
- Compare accruals to actuals in prior periods
- Check for consistent treatment across months
- Determine which accruals are based on contracts
- Track accruals that require legal input
- Flag accruals without clear documentation
- Assess the timeliness of accrual submissions
- Evaluate the audit trail for reversal entries
- Map the approval path for high-value accruals
- Collect variance explanations from the last six closes
- Classify variances as expected or unexpected
- Identify which departments provide timely responses
- Review the depth of narrative in variance reports
- Check for recycled explanations across periods
- Determine which variances exceed thresholds
- Map the time spent writing versus reviewing explanations
- Flag variances explained with incomplete data
- Assess whether explanations lead to process changes
- Track how variances are used in management meetings
- Evaluate the format consistency of variance memos
- Note which variances are never questioned
- List all close milestones and their due dates
- Identify tasks with floating start dates
- Map dependencies between reconciliation tasks
- Track which tasks wait for external inputs
- Document the lag between data availability and action
- Identify bottlenecks in the approval chain
- Record the number of tasks due on the same day
- Highlight tasks that consistently run late
- Note which tasks lack ownership clarity
- Track revision cycles for close deliverables
- Measure time between draft and final versions
- Flag tasks delayed by system access issues
- Define the required elements of a reconciliation
- Check for uniform formatting across templates
- Review the use of standard descriptions
- Audit the inclusion of supporting documentation
- Verify the presence of preparer and reviewer names
- Assess date accuracy in reconciliation headers
- Check for consistent account numbering
- Review the use of tick marks and review notes
- Evaluate the storage location of completed reconciliations
- Track version control practices
- Identify reconciliations missing sign-off
- Assess how reconciliations are archived
- List all recurring manual journal entries
- Document the rationale for each recurring entry
- Map the approval workflow for high-value entries
- Review the attachment of source documentation
- Check for consistent naming conventions
- Identify entries created outside the ERP
- Track the number of entries reversed in subsequent periods
- Assess the clarity of entry descriptions
- Verify the matching of entry amounts to supporting data
- Evaluate the timeliness of entry posting
- Flag entries with missing approver signatures
- Review the audit trail for post-close adjustments
- List all intercompany transaction types
- Map the process for recording intercompany sales
- Review the frequency of intercompany reconciliations
- Identify mismatches in currency translation
- Track the resolution time for discrepancies
- Document the approval process for adjustments
- Assess the use of centralized vs. local ledgers
- Check for consistent accounting policies across entities
- Review the role of tax in intercompany pricing
- Evaluate the timing of intercompany cutoffs
- Identify entities with recurring reconciliation gaps
- Track the number of manual intercompany entries
- List all ERP modules used in the close
- Identify data exports used for reconciliation
- Check for discrepancies between sub-ledger and general ledger
- Review the timing of data refreshes
- Assess the accuracy of automated journal postings
- Track the number of manual corrections required
- Evaluate the consistency of coding practices
- Review access controls for critical modules
- Check for unauthorized changes to master data
- Assess the backup process for close-related data
- Verify the integrity of period-end cutoffs
- Document the process for resolving data errors
- List all individuals involved in the close
- Define the primary owner for each reconciliation
- Map the escalation path for unresolved items
- Review the training provided for close tasks
- Assess cross-training coverage for key roles
- Identify single points of failure in the process
- Track the time allocated to close responsibilities
- Evaluate role clarity in job descriptions
- Review the use of task assignment tools
- Assess feedback loops between reviewers and preparers
- Document how turnover impacts close execution
- Identify roles requiring system access updates
- List all audit requests from the last two years
- Review the completeness of audit packages
- Check for timely response to auditor inquiries
- Assess the clarity of documentation provided
- Track recurring audit findings
- Evaluate the process for addressing control gaps
- Review the retention policy for close records
- Check for segregation of duties in key tasks
- Assess the use of audit-specific templates
- Document how walkthroughs are prepared
- Identify areas with insufficient evidence
- Review the follow-up process for audit recommendations
- Summarize the top three process bottlenecks
- Identify which tasks can be standardized
- List opportunities to reduce manual effort
- Define what 'faster close' means for your team
- Assess which changes require policy updates
- Prioritize improvements by impact and effort
- Map quick wins with minimal disruption
- Identify changes needing cross-functional buy-in
- Define success metrics for each initiative
- Build a timeline for phased implementation
- Assign ownership for each improvement
- Create a feedback loop for ongoing refinement
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.
Thousands of organisations have bought from The Art of Service since 2000.