A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering DORA for Financial Services Engineering Leaders
A complete implementation path for resilient systems in regulated environments
The situation this course is for
Engineering teams in regulated financial environments spend disproportionate cycles reacting to audit timelines, stitching together control narratives after the fact. With DORA’s live testing mandates looming, the cost of retrofitting resilience into existing systems grows monthly. The gap isn't awareness, it's implemented, traceable, and automated control design that aligns engineering output with regulator expectations.
Who this is for
Senior Software Engineer in financial services, embedded in a core platform team with direct line-of-sight to system reliability, compliance evidence, and incident response under regulatory scrutiny
Who this is not for
Entry-level developers without system ownership, consultants focused on documentation-only compliance, or non-technical risk analysts
What you walk away with
- Map DORA control requirements directly to existing CI/CD pipelines and monitoring layers
- Automate evidence generation for annual resilience testing cycles
- Design and validate failover workflows that pass regulator observation
- Reduce cross-functional chasing during audit preparation windows
- Position engineering-led resilience as a strategic capability within the organization
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Understanding DORA’s scope as it applies to market infrastructure
- Key differences between DORA and prior resilience expectations
- Identifying critical functions under Article 5
- Defining severe stress scenarios for trading systems
- Setting maximum tolerable downtime thresholds
- Control objectives for internal processes and external dependencies
- Role of the competent authority in oversight
- Timeline for implementation and testing cycles
- Integration with existing BC/DR programs
- Regulatory reporting expectations under Article 7
- Vendor risk escalation paths under Article 8
- How DORA aligns with FFIEC and SR 11-7
- Decomposing 'critical function' into technical services
- Using service ownership data to assign accountability
- Mapping transaction flows across microservices
- Identifying single points of failure in data pipelines
- Validating call graphs with production telemetry
- Classifying dependencies by resilience tier
- Documenting data loss and recovery windows
- Integrating with CMDB for automated reporting
- Versioning control mappings across environments
- Handling third-party service providers
- Aligning with NIST CSF Identify and Protect functions
- Output: machine-readable control inventory
- Defining 'severe' in context of market systems
- Using historical outage data to inform scenarios
- Designing failover tests for high-throughput systems
- Simulating network partition scenarios
- Testing cascading failures in event-driven architectures
- Incorporating security breach triggers
- Planning for personnel unavailability
- Setting measurable thresholds for success
- Documenting expected recovery time and data loss
- Scenario versioning across testing cycles
- Aligning with SOC 2 availability criteria
- Integrating with chaos engineering tooling
- Integrating control checks into pull request gates
- Automating uptime and failover testing in staging
- Generating compliance reports from pipeline logs
- Storing evidence in immutable storage
- Versioning control documentation with code
- Using GitOps to track configuration changes
- Tagging deployments with resilience metadata
- Linking incidents to control gaps
- Building dashboard views for reviewer access
- Enabling read-only auditor roles in tooling
- Audit trail retention policies
- Integrating with ServiceNow for ticket lineage
- Defining roles in incident and failover response
- Building runbooks with automated decision trees
- Validating DNS and load balancer failover paths
- Testing data consistency across regions
- Validating authentication and authorization post-failover
- Automating rollback triggers
- Measuring recovery point and recovery time
- Integrating with monitoring for status signaling
- Documenting observed results for auditors
- Calibrating alerting thresholds post-recovery
- Updating topology maps automatically
- Versioning workflows across environments
- Mapping critical third-party dependencies
- Requiring DORA compliance from vendors
- Validating vendor stress testing results
- Incorporating SIG questionnaires into onboarding
- Tracking vendor test timelines and results
- Implementing escalation paths for outages
- Assessing vendor failover plan adequacy
- Documenting reliance strategies in SoA
- Redacting sensitive vendor data in reports
- Integrating vendor data into centralized dashboards
- Handling multi-tenant provider dependencies
- Setting contractual obligations for testing frequency
- Mapping DORA Articles to technical controls
- Assigning control ownership at the team level
- Documenting current state vs. required state
- Using Jira labels for control tracking
- Integrating with risk registers
- Prioritizing control gaps by impact and effort
- Creating action items from control findings
- Linking controls to architecture decisions
- Versioning control mappings over time
- Reporting control status to leadership
- Aligning with ISO 27001 clause 15
- Integrating with audit management platforms
- Scheduling tests outside trading hours
- Creating isolated test environments
- Validating data consistency post-test
- Involving compliance and legal observers
- Documenting deviations from expected outcomes
- Capturing screenshots and logs for evidence
- Using feature flags to isolate impact
- Coordinating with vendor teams
- Measuring test success against KPIs
- Reporting results to competent authority
- Updating control design post-test
- Archiving test records for retention
- Integrating with existing incident management tools
- Defining escalation thresholds
- Assigning resilience-specific roles in incident
- Communicating status to internal and external parties
- Documenting decisions made under pressure
- Validating post-mortem processes
- Involving compliance in major incidents
- Setting up war room coordination
- Using templates for regulator updates
- Archiving incident records
- Testing command structure in simulations
- Aligning with NIST CSF Respond function
- Preparing initial DORA implementation brief
- Scheduling regulator check-ins
- Sharing test plans in advance
- Creating read-only access to evidence
- Documenting rationale for design choices
- Using standard formats for reporting
- Translating technical details for non-technical reviewers
- Maintaining versioned documentation
- Building response playbooks for inquiries
- Coordinating legal review of submissions
- Tracking regulator feedback loops
- Updating materials post-engagement
- Scheduling recurring resilience tests
- Updating control mappings with architecture changes
- Revising stress scenarios annually
- Onboarding new services into the program
- Training new engineers on resilience practices
- Auditing control implementation quarterly
- Reporting metrics to leadership
- Integrating with change management
- Tracking technical debt in resilience controls
- Updating vendor assessments
- Reviewing incident learnings
- Planning for DORA updates
- Framing resilience as engineering excellence
- Recognizing teams for successful tests
- Creating internal certifications
- Sharing learnings across platforms
- Building internal communities of practice
- Mentoring junior engineers on controls
- Incentivizing proactive risk identification
- Measuring engineer confidence in failover
- Tying resilience outcomes to performance
- Publishing internal resilience benchmarks
- Advocating for investment in tooling
- Positioning team as regulator-ready
How this maps to your situation
- Critical trading system ownership under regulatory scrutiny
- Engineer-led implementation of mandated resilience testing
- Automating compliance evidence for audit efficiency
- Building cross-functional trust with compliance and risk teams
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per week over 12 weeks, or accelerated self-paced completion in under 30 hours total.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance courses, this program focuses on engineer-led DORA implementation with direct mapping to CI/CD, incident response, and system design. It avoids theoretical frameworks and delivers working code patterns, pipeline integrations, and audit-ready documentation templates.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.