A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering DORA for Global Relationship Managers in Financial Services
Build defensible, regulator-ready narratives that stand up to scrutiny on first review
The situation this course is for
Relationship managers in global finance are increasingly expected to produce regulator-aware summaries that align with DORA's operational resilience mandates. Without a structured approach, outputs often require multiple review cycles to meet compliance thresholds, delaying client decisions and straining cross-functional trust.
Who this is for
Senior relationship leader in global banking who interfaces between client strategy and regulatory resilience expectations
Who this is not for
Entry-level account managers without responsibility for client portfolio continuity or resilience planning
What you walk away with
- Produce client resilience summaries with embedded DORA evidence that pass initial review
- Structure escalation narratives with clear ownership and documented response playbooks
- Map third-party dependencies to resilience scenarios using standardised templates
- Anticipate follow-up questions from compliance teams with pre-built justification flows
- Deliver consistent, auditable narratives across jurisdictions without rework
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining operational resilience in the context of client relationships
- DORA’s scope as it applies to cross-border financial services
- Key obligations for firms under Article 5 and 6
- How relationship managers are now part of resilience planning
- Mapping client portfolios to critical functions
- Understanding the role of materiality assessments
- Overview of ICT third-party risk expectations
- Evidence requirements for relationship-level reporting
- DORA timelines and reporting deadlines by jurisdiction
- Integration points with internal audit and compliance teams
- Common misalignments between relationship summaries and DORA scope
- Baseline assessment: where your current workflows stand
- Elements of a defensible resilience narrative
- Linking client continuity expectations to firm-level BCP
- Documenting response capabilities for critical services
- Incorporating service continuity assurances from vendors
- Using standardised language across jurisdictions
- Structuring justification for review without rework
- Avoiding assumptions in narrative construction
- Referencing internal policies within client summaries
- Version control and change tracking for resilience docs
- Incorporating regulatory terminology accurately
- Balancing commercial sensitivity with transparency
- Template adaptation for regional variations
- Types of acceptable evidence under DORA Articles 19, 20
- Mapping evidence to specific client tiers
- Documenting third-party audit reports and assessments
- Capturing internal testing results for resilience scenarios
- Organising evidence repositories by geography
- Using metadata to streamline retrieval
- Ensuring evidence freshness and validity periods
- Cross-referencing evidence in narrative submissions
- Handling gaps in vendor-provided documentation
- Maintaining audit trails for evidence updates
- Aligning evidence with internal control frameworks
- Common pitfalls in evidence completeness
- Identifying material third parties in client portfolios
- Classifying outsourcing vs. cloud service arrangements
- Reviewing contractual clauses for resilience alignment
- Assessing provider incident response capabilities
- Documenting multi-provider interdependencies
- Creating dependency heatmaps for leadership review
- Tracking provider compliance with DORA requirements
- Escalation protocols when provider fails resilience test
- Reporting on sub-outsourcing chains
- Using SIG Lite and other standard questionnaires
- Maintaining up-to-date due diligence records
- Integrating dependency data into client summaries
- Defining incident thresholds for client impact
- Designing role-based notification trees
- Documenting decision authority during outages
- Integrating with NOC and incident response teams
- Time-bound escalation triggers and SLAs
- Recording decisions during live incidents
- Post-event review documentation requirements
- Linking incident logs to client communications
- Using runbooks to guide escalation actions
- Testing escalation pathways with tabletop exercises
- Capturing lessons learned in future planning
- Auditing escalation pathway effectiveness
- Understanding DORA’s testing frequency and scope
- Role of relationship managers in scenario design
- Providing client impact inputs for test scenarios
- Reviewing test plans for completeness
- Observing internal and external test execution
- Documenting test outcomes and observations
- Reporting client-specific findings to compliance
- Using test results to refine continuity narratives
- Addressing gaps identified during testing
- Integrating test evidence into submissions
- Preparing for regulator-observed tests
- Maintaining test records for audit readiness
- Understanding EBA vs. local regulator expectations
- Harmonising terminology across reporting lines
- Managing differences in materiality thresholds
- Documenting jurisdiction-specific dependencies
- Local legal counsel involvement in narrative review
- Translation considerations for resilience documents
- Central vs. local control over evidence flow
- Reporting consolidated views to headquarters
- Using global templates with local adaptations
- Handling data privacy constraints in reporting
- Aligning with local incident response protocols
- Benchmarking resilience maturity across regions
- Understanding audit checklist requirements
- Preparing for audit evidence requests
- Scheduling pre-submission alignment sessions
- Documenting rationale for audit trails
- Responding to findings without defensiveness
- Using audit outcomes to improve templates
- Integrating feedback into future cycles
- Maintaining ongoing dialogue with compliance
- Clarifying scope boundaries with auditors
- Leveraging audit input to strengthen narratives
- Avoiding common audit criticisms
- Building trust through consistency
- Crafting initial incident notifications
- Managing expectations during ongoing outages
- Providing regular status updates to clients
- Coordinating messaging across regions
- Using pre-approved communication templates
- Escalating client concerns to response team
- Balancing transparency and reputational risk
- Documenting communication decisions
- Post-incident client debriefs
- Integrating client feedback into improvements
- Training team members on communication protocols
- Auditing communication effectiveness after events
- Common regulator questions on relationship impact
- Preparing evidence packages in advance
- Anticipating follow-up on third-party dependencies
- Structuring responses with clear attribution
- Avoiding speculation in written replies
- Using internal approvals for final responses
- Maintaining inquiry response logs
- Benchmarking against peer institution approaches
- Practicing response workflows under time pressure
- Documenting rationale for decisions made
- Incorporating lessons from past inquiries
- Building confidence in response defensibility
- Designing for maintainability and reuse
- Scheduling regular document reviews
- Tracking changes in client portfolio structure
- Updating dependencies as providers change
- Versioning and archiving old documents
- Automating reminders for refresh cycles
- Integrating with CRM for client change alerts
- Using metadata to manage document lifecycles
- Ensuring document accessibility across regions
- Training new team members on documentation standards
- Auditing document health metrics
- Reducing technical debt in narrative assets
- Checklist for pre-submission review
- Verifying evidence completeness and linkage
- Obtaining necessary internal sign-offs
- Formatting outputs for audit readiness
- Delivering to compliance and oversight teams
- Tracking submission status and feedback
- Handling requests for revision efficiently
- Celebrating completion of resilience cycle
- Capturing institutional knowledge
- Handing over to successor teams
- Reviewing process for future improvements
- Maintaining submission records for audit
How this maps to your situation
- When DORA scope expands to include client-facing continuity planning
- Before first internal audit cycle under new resilience policy
- While managing cross-border client portfolio resilience alignment
- After regulator requests clarification on third-party dependencies
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per week over six weeks, with self-paced access to all materials.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic compliance trainings, this course delivers role-specific workflows and real-world templates tailored to global relationship managers navigating DORA implementation , not abstract principles.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.