A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for Internal Audit Leaders in Global Technology
A structured path to embed business continuity confidence across audit functions
Each order is checked and updated against the latest insights before delivery. That is why access takes up to 24 hours rather than being instant.
The situation this course is for
Audit teams spend excessive cycles reconciling continuity test results across regions, especially when evidence formats and control depth vary. This delay impacts review timing and weakens the perceived reliability of findings, even when risks are properly identified.
Who this is for
Internal Audit practitioner at a major global tech firm, experienced in control validation, navigating complex cross-functional evidence collection, accountable for clean, timely audit outputs across jurisdictions
Who this is not for
This course is not for external consultants without internal audit experience, junior staff not involved in evidence synthesis, or professionals focused solely on IT disaster recovery without audit integration
What you walk away with
- Produce continuity audit packages that require no rework before regional sign-off
- Standardize evidence collection workflows across multiple business units using ISO 22301 control objectives
- Reduce time spent validating cross-region continuity tests by at least 70%
- Build reusable templates for test observation summaries, risk escalation briefs, and control maturity scoring
- Position internal audit as the central node in Meta’s operational resilience validation
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Introduction to business continuity management systems
- How ISO 22301 differs from related standards like ISO 27001
- Key definitions: BCM, BIA, MTPD, RTO, RPO explained
- Clause 4 context of the organization in audit terms
- Understanding scope definition for multi-region tech ops
- Roles and responsibilities under ISO 22301 for auditors
- Integrating BCM with existing GRC frameworks
- Audit relevance of leadership commitment clauses
- Documented information requirements for audit readiness
- Linking policy intent to evidence collection plans
- How clause 5 supports auditor credibility
- Planning audit cycles around BCM maturity stages
- What makes a BIA audit-ready vs. theoretical
- Validating scope coverage in BIA documentation
- Assessing methodology consistency across business units
- Evaluating criticality scoring models for objectivity
- Checking alignment between BIA outcomes and RTOs
- How to spot underreported dependencies in BIA outputs
- Sampling techniques for BIA validation
- Reviewing timelines and resource estimates for realism
- Cross-checking BIA results with incident data
- Identifying gaps in third-party inclusion
- Documenting findings on BIA maturity
- Reporting upward on BIA reliability
- Reviewing risk criteria establishment for BCM
- Auditing risk identification processes across regions
- Checking completeness of threat and vulnerability lists
- Assessing risk analysis methodology (qualitative vs. quantitative)
- Validating risk evaluation against organizational appetite
- How to test risk treatment plan feasibility
- Examining residual risk acceptance processes
- Linking risk register updates to operational changes
- Auditing ownership assignment for risk actions
- Tracking closure of risk mitigation items
- Sampling risk scenarios for depth of analysis
- Reporting on risk assessment maturity
- Reviewing strategy selection against RTOs and RPOs
- Assessing alternate site adequacy for key systems
- Validating data backup and recovery procedures
- Auditing cloud failover mechanisms and assumptions
- Checking manual workarounds for viability
- Evaluating supply chain continuity provisions
- Reviewing workforce availability plans
- Assessing communication plans for internal teams
- Auditing cyber resilience integration points
- Validating strategy coverage across time zones
- Documenting design weaknesses and gaps
- Reporting on strategic preparedness
- What makes a procedure audit-ready and executable
- Validating role assignments and contact information
- Reviewing step-by-step recovery instructions
- Checking integration with technical runbooks
- Assessing clarity of decision points and triggers
- Auditing escalation paths and approval chains
- Evaluating version control and change management
- Reviewing accessibility during outages
- Testing procedure completeness for critical flows
- Checking language and format consistency
- Sampling procedures for usability
- Documenting procedural gaps
- Reviewing training program objectives and design
- Auditing participation rates across regions
- Assessing role-specific training content relevance
- Evaluating delivery methods and engagement levels
- Checking frequency and timing of training sessions
- Validating awareness campaign reach and impact
- Reviewing post-training assessments and feedback
- Auditing knowledge retention over time
- Sampling staff understanding during interviews
- Linking training outcomes to test performance
- Documenting awareness maturity
- Reporting on training effectiveness
- Reviewing test planning and scheduling processes
- Assessing test scenario realism and coverage
- Evaluating participant selection and preparedness
- Auditing test execution documentation
- Checking observation recording practices
- Validating after-action review completeness
- Reviewing finding categorization and prioritization
- Auditing action item tracking and closure
- Assessing test frequency against risk profile
- Linking test results to strategy updates
- Sampling test reports for quality
- Reporting on testing maturity
- Reviewing management review agenda and frequency
- Auditing decision documentation from review meetings
- Assessing input data quality for reviews
- Evaluating follow-up on action items from reviews
- Checking integration with enterprise risk reporting
- Validating performance metric selection and trends
- Reviewing incident feedback loops into BCM
- Auditing changes to scope, strategy, or resources
- Assessing continual improvement culture
- Sampling improvement initiatives for impact
- Documenting leadership engagement level
- Reporting on improvement cycle effectiveness
- Understanding cyber incident escalation to BCM
- Auditing handoff processes between IR and BCM teams
- Validating alignment of RTOs with cyber recovery plans
- Reviewing joint test scenarios for cyber disruptions
- Assessing communication coordination during crises
- Evaluating data integrity checks post-failover
- Checking third-party cyber continuity dependencies
- Auditing cloud provider failover integration
- Reviewing ransomware-specific continuity measures
- Mapping dependencies across digital services
- Sampling cross-functional recovery drills
- Reporting on cyber-BCM integration maturity
- Creating a centralized evidence framework
- Defining minimum evidence requirements per control
- Developing standardized templates for test reports
- Establishing regional audit liaison roles
- Validating time zone-adjusted test documentation
- Auditing language and translation consistency
- Reviewing local regulation impact on evidence
- Implementing version-controlled evidence libraries
- Checking access rights and data residency rules
- Automating evidence collection triggers
- Sampling regional packages for uniformity
- Reporting on evidence standardization progress
- Designing a modular audit program framework
- Developing control-specific testing checklists
- Creating risk-based sampling guides
- Building standardized finding write-up templates
- Establishing consistent rating scales
- Designing executive summary formats
- Creating visual dashboards for audit status
- Developing cross-reference matrices
- Building playbook for new auditor onboarding
- Versioning and maintaining artifact library
- Sharing artifacts across audit teams
- Measuring reuse and time savings
- Communicating findings with strategic context
- Building credibility through consistency
- Engaging proactively with BCM program owners
- Presenting maturity trends over time
- Advising on emerging resilience risks
- Influencing investment in continuity capabilities
- Contributing to crisis simulation design
- Supporting regulatory and investor inquiries
- Publishing internal resilience benchmarks
- Mentoring junior auditors on BCM
- Positioning audit as enabler not gatekeeper
- Sustaining influence through value delivery
How this maps to your situation
- Initial audit planning for ISO 22301 alignment
- Mid-cycle evidence reconciliation across regions
- Pre-review package finalization
- Post-audit improvement and influence expansion
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 5 hours of focused work, designed for completion in short sessions over a few weeks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic BCM courses focus on practitioner implementation. This course is built specifically for auditors who must validate and influence continuity programs across complex global organizations, not run them directly.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.