A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 22301 for Global Service Improvement Analysts
A structured approach to embedding resilience in service delivery frameworks
The situation this course is for
Many service improvement teams invest significant effort into business continuity frameworks, only to face repeated revisions during client assurance cycles. The gap isn't intent, it's structure. Without a clear, auditable trail anchored in ISO 22301, even strong plans are questioned, delayed, or downgraded. This creates last-minute scrambles, erodes credibility, and keeps teams reactive instead of leading.
Who this is for
Service Improvement Analyst at a global IT services firm, responsible for designing, reviewing, or certifying service continuity frameworks. Works across client deliverables where SLAs and uptime guarantees are non-negotiable. Needs to turn continuity from a compliance chore into a differentiator.
Who this is not for
This is not for risk officers focused on enterprise-wide BCM, nor for ITIL-only process leads. If you're not actively shaping continuity frameworks for client-facing service contracts, this course won’t match your context.
What you walk away with
- Produce audit-ready continuity plans that pass client review the first time
- Build reusable evidence templates that scale across engagements
- Lead the narrative in client assurance cycles with confidence
- Become the internal reference for resilient service design
- Design continuity into service improvements from day one
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Mapping ISO 22301 clauses to service-level agreements
- How continuity expectations are evolving in managed services
- Key differences between BCM in product vs service environments
- The role of the Service Improvement Analyst in continuity planning
- Benchmarking current maturity against ISO 22301 requirements
- Common pitfalls in cross-client continuity frameworks
- Integrating service continuity with existing ITIL processes
- Client audit expectations for continuity evidence
- The difference between availability and resilience in contracts
- How regulators interpret continuity in outsourced models
- Aligning internal audits with client-facing reviews
- Building continuity into improvement project charters
- Identifying mission-critical services by client and contract
- Quantifying downtime cost for SLA-bound services
- Stakeholder interviews that reveal actual pain points
- Documenting critical dependencies across systems and teams
- Using client escalation data to inform BIA scoring
- Avoiding over-scoping in BIA for global accounts
- Linking BIA findings to recovery time objectives
- Presenting BIA outcomes to service delivery leads
- Updating BIA after contract changes or scope events
- Automating BIA refresh triggers in service operations
- Integrating BIA with client-specific risk registers
- Validating BIA assumptions through tabletop exercises
- Defining RTOs based on contractual penalties and goodwill
- Balancing technical feasibility with client expectations
- Documenting assumptions behind each RTO decision
- How to justify extended RTOs for low-impact services
- RTO validation through past incident response data
- Integrating RTOs with incident management workflows
- Client communication plans tied to recovery timelines
- Recovery sequencing across interdependent services
- RTO reporting for audit and client assurance
- Adjusting RTOs after system changes or decommissioning
- RTOs for hybrid cloud and on-prem infrastructure
- RTO exceptions and approval workflows
- Choosing strategies based on recovery objectives
- Documenting manual workarounds with clear ownership
- Integrating DR sites with continuity plans
- Using cloud failover as a formal strategy
- Vendor dependencies in continuity planning
- Documenting alternate work locations and resources
- Communications plans for internal and client teams
- Security considerations during continuity activation
- Legal and compliance constraints on continuity options
- Maintaining strategy documentation across revisions
- Linking strategy choices to risk appetite statements
- How to update strategies after a test or real event
- Structuring plans for quick reference under pressure
- Including step-by-step recovery procedures by role
- Defining roles and responsibilities clearly
- Contact lists that are kept up to date
- Plans that integrate with incident response frameworks
- Using runbooks to support continuity execution
- Version control and distribution of continuity plans
- Accessibility of plans during outages
- Language and format for multi-region teams
- Client-specific annexes in continuity plans
- How to document plan exceptions and limitations
- Training requirements tied to plan ownership
- Choosing between tabletop, simulation, and full-scale tests
- Designing scenarios based on real client risks
- Involving the right stakeholders without overburdening
- Test objectives tied to audit requirements
- Documenting test evidence for client review
- Capturing lessons learned in a structured way
- Reporting test outcomes to management and clients
- Handling test failures constructively
- Scheduling tests to avoid client disruption
- Using test results to improve RTOs and strategies
- Remote testing models for distributed teams
- Requiring client sign-off on test adequacy
- Centralizing continuity documentation securely
- Version control for plan updates and revisions
- Naming conventions for easy audit navigation
- Evidence requirements for ISO 22301 certification
- Client-specific evidence addenda
- Retention periods for test records and reports
- Secure sharing of evidence with client auditors
- Automating evidence collection triggers
- Gap analysis templates for readiness checks
- Audit response playbooks for continuity reviews
- Updating documentation after incidents or changes
- Integrating evidence with GRC platforms
- Continuity assessment at project initiation
- Including continuity in service design documentation
- Risk reviews that cover continuity implications
- Designing improvements with recovery in mind
- Continuity validation in UAT and go-live
- Handover of new services to continuity frameworks
- Continuity review gates in project lifecycles
- Post-implementation continuity testing
- Updating plans after major enhancements
- Continuity considerations for decommissioning
- Cross-project dependency mapping
- Continuity KPIs in service transition reports
- Key metrics for continuity performance
- Dashboards that show readiness at a glance
- Reporting test results without overclaiming
- Demonstrating improvement over time
- Maturity models for continuity frameworks
- Client assurance reporting templates
- Executive summaries of continuity posture
- Benchmarking against peer organizations
- Using maturity data to justify investments
- Reporting during client escalations
- Annual statements of compliance
- Continuity in business reviews and QBRs
- Preparing for a continuity audit walkthrough
- Common client auditor questions and how to answer
- Evidence pack structure for smooth review
- Role-playing difficult audit scenarios
- Handling requests for undocumented scenarios
- Auditor communication protocols
- Responding to findings and non-conformities
- Tracking corrective actions to closure
- Using audits to improve framework design
- Building rapport with client assurance teams
- Avoiding over-commitment during reviews
- Post-audit reporting to internal leadership
- Balancing standardization with customization
- Managing continuity across geographies
- Language and cultural considerations
- Multi-client evidence repository design
- Client-specific annexes and addenda
- Change control for multi-client frameworks
- Consistent governance with local flexibility
- Sharing best practices across accounts
- Scaling templates without losing relevance
- Client feedback loops for framework improvement
- Training delivery across regions
- Managing turnover in multi-client teams
- Building credibility through consistent delivery
- Knowledge sharing without overstepping
- Mentoring junior analysts in continuity design
- Contributing to firm-wide frameworks
- Speaking up during client escalations
- Publishing internal guidance and templates
- Presenting at internal forums and councils
- Developing a point of view on emerging threats
- Building relationships with peer specialists
- Positioning continuity as a differentiator
- Communicating value beyond compliance
- Measuring personal impact on team performance
How this maps to your situation
- Global service delivery under SLAs
- Client-facing audit readiness
- Multi-client framework consistency
- Continuity integration with improvement projects
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per week over three months, designed to fit around delivery commitments.
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic BCM courses teach theory. This course gives you client-ready frameworks, audit-tested evidence patterns, and the proven structure to become the internal reference others follow.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.